Hey true believers, SSS here in between the Christmas and New Year's drinking binges. We know we haven't posted anything in quite a bit but Superman movie news related to either Singerman or JLA has been about as rare as a comicbook on Singer's bookshelf so its been a bit tough to come up with much. We did however find this recent news story about Singerman producer Jon Peters latest escapade and couldnt resist commenting on it. After the last time good ole Jon made the news, it really made us wonder what exactly goes on over at WB Features and why there seems to be an overall lack of accountability for ANYTHING over there. But this latest incident of Peters' really takes the cake, as he's now being sued by THREE former employees, one for sexual harassment, and the other, a couple, who claims Peters wanted the pregnant wife to have an abortion or he'd fire the husband!
Blanca Hernandez alleged in her suit that Peters "systematically sexually harassed" her on nearly a daily basis. The incidents included unwanted touching, hugging and attempting to push Hernandez into bed while Peters was naked. The suit also claimed that Peters attempted to kiss her breasts, referring to them as "pillows."Nice guy. At least this time, the person he's harassing is of legal age. Although the murder threat is a new one even for him. It gets better:
The suit also alleged that an official at Peters Entertainment warned her that if she complained about Peters, "her and her daughter would be murdered." Hernandez was fired July 25, 2006, after approximately a year on the job, according to court papers.
Adriana and Andrew Silveira contended in their lawsuit that after she learned she was pregnant in June 2006, her husband was told by Peters that if he wanted to keep his job, she should have an abortion. The lawsuit did not make clear why Peters allegedly made the demand. When the couple refused, Peters sent Andrew Silveira an e-mail informing him that he was being fired, the suit stated.That should remove any kind of lingering doubt in anyone's mind as to whether Peters really is a grade A douchebag. How he continues to remain employed by WB is anyone's guess at this point. How long can the credit he gets for Batman in 1989 really last? We wonder how Superman could be taken so far out of character by Singer and Co. but the answer would seem to lie at the top of the food chain starting with it's producer and trickling on down. Let's hope this clown gets thrown out as well.
36 comments:
I guess innocent until proven guilty means nothing to you. Some of this just seems like total bullshit. Threatening to kill a family? Come on. I have no doubt that Peters is a scumbag, but believing everything this woman says without seeing evidence is a bit presumptious, don't you think?
The above: an apologist?
C'mon now... This is now the 4th time in the past 2 and 1/2 years that Peters has been sued for sexually harassing someone. At some point, its not just coincidence.
Oh, I have no doubt that he's done some of this shit. He's a dirtbag, but I have a hard time believing that somebody threatened to murder her family if she complained.
In these cases there are always exaggerations built upon truth. I have no doubt he fondled her and shit, but I think the murder threats is just the girl embellishing her story. Since, there is probably NO way to prove that.
But, I agree, the guy needs to be locked away and stripped of whatever money and power he has.
I thought Peters was a faggot. You know, Peters wanting peter. Sexually harrassing a woman has got to set a new precedent. Whatever the case, he still is without a doubt at least somewhat responsible for the gayfest that was Singerman Sucks. As was BS. Is this what WB really wants for their superhero franchises?
Jon Peters swings both ways
Singer is a fag, & Peters swings both ways.
Peters' idea of a threesome? Probably 2 MEN & a woman.
True believers! lmao
BS to BJ: "Great cock, man." SLURP!
Peterman, giving head & packing fudge.
"I guess innocent until proven guilty means nothing to you. Some of this just seems like total bullshit. Threatening to kill a family? Come on. I have no doubt that Peters is a scumbag, but believing everything this woman says without seeing evidence is a bit presumptious, don't you think?"
Here's a newsflash for you: This is a BLOG. On BLOG's, people give their OPINIONS on news stories, recent happenings, and current events. If S.S.S. wanted to say he thought Peters stuck a .45 in her cunt and threatened to blow her colon out her ass, he can do it. It's HIS BLOG.
And I would have thought this was the PERFECT story to get "superfag95" to chime in. I mean, it's got the words "Peter" "sexual" and "poking". You know, REtards three favorite words?
Hey, Apologist donkey rapists, still "thinking" a sequel is happening? Here's a hint: Come March, BS is GONE.
WB doesnt fire Peters because he does a better job then most of the morons in the US. Thanks to sub prime loans I can buy half the US on my annual salery. And as it been said a billion times WB the returns sequel will happen.....making......
Singer will return in 2009!
rEstart
I would wish you all merry christmas but the US is full of atheists.
Singer is a FAG and Superman Returns was gay.
"WB doesnt fire Peters because he does a better job then most of the morons in the US. Thanks to sub prime loans I can buy half the US on my annual salery. And as it been said a billion times WB the returns sequel will happen.....making......
Singer will return in 2009!
rEstart
I would wish you all merry christmas but the US is full of atheists."
Anyone need further PROOF that I OWN "superfag95"? I question the homo pig's whereabouts, lo and behold, the cum-guzzler comes a runnin'!
And what the FUCK is THIS supposed to mean, you illiterate 'mo?
"And as it been said a billion times WB the returns sequel will happen"
Jesus, them dick-slaps from BS have turned what little brain you had to Jelly, "superfag95". Who knew 2 inches could do so much damage??
Superman Returns was the first movie in motion picture history to test positive for HIV.
AP if you can read WB said a billion times JLA Jr. and the superman and batman sequels will both be supported. So I do not know why this site thinks Returns sequel is dead.
Singers vision will fly again.
Restart
Call me what you want Ap but i make 0.50 on your dollar so its me who is laughing. All the way to the bank!
How the fuck is the exchange rate of the Euro to the Us Dollar relevant in any way, shape, or form to anything on this blog? have you become so desperate for anything to support Singer's piece of shit that you're pointing out exchange rates? does that make any fucking sense to anyone?
You lose retard, go home. And remember to thank the British, Germans, and Dutch for propping up the value of the Euro because it sure as fuck isnt the French Franc that was doing it. Congrats on yet again being dependent on other nations for your well being. The rest of the world howeber isnt fooled. They all still see you as a nation of cowards and turncoats who bury their heads at the first sign of conflict.
"Call me what you want Ap but i make 0.50 on your dollar so its me who is laughing. All the way to the bank!"
If you make 50 cents on our dollar than you make HALF of what we make you french retarded fuck.
"AP if you can read WB said a billion times JLA Jr. and the superman and batman sequels will both be supported. So I do not know why this site thinks Returns sequel is dead.
Singers vision will fly again.
Restart
Call me what you want Ap but i make 0.50 on your dollar so its me who is laughing. All the way to the bank!"
Since EVERYONE ELSE has already kicked your cock-loving ass, "superfag95", all I will say is: Fuck off, Apologist shit-stain!!
To everyone else, once Robinov takes over the Singerman sequel will OFFICIALLY be shit-canned. "superfag95" is half "right" on one thing though: They WILL support a solo Superman film. It'll just be the JLA Supes, NOT Singerman.
And I see that BJ Routh thinks his opinion matters when it comes to politics. Obama? Way to back a LOSER, BJ....
But then again, he bent-over for a LOSER, so no surprise.
"So I do not know why this site thinks Returns sequel is dead.
Le Retard"
That's because you're a fuckhead who is delusional and clutching at straws.
Man, you're even stupider than Neal Fagley and Steve Eunich.....and that's a heck of an achievement that could only really be accomplished by someone in France....or Terminal himself
Fake posting alert! Fake posting alert!
"Superman movie news related to either Singerman or JLA has been about as rare as a comicbook on Singer's bookshelf"
Yeah and i don't think we have any news coming SSS for quite some time. This strike looks like it is going to be dragged on for many more months and Hollywood news really on all fronts related to films not yet in production is dead as a doornail. WB was supposed to announce JL as official a long time ago. If this was so close to being in production, we would know who is playing Superman by now. I think the strike is affecting JL as well even though the rumors were they had a finished script. It would be nice to hear something official about this but i don't see JL happening until after the strike, just my opinion.
"I think the strike is affecting JL as well even though the rumors were they had a finished script. It would be nice to hear something official about this but i don't see JL happening until after the strike, just my opinion."
And you'd be wrong. Not opinion, FACT.
There is a "power shift" at WB. Now that Robinov is in charge, HE will make the announcment. He wasn't going to let Horn steal his "thunder". The JLA cast, and film in general, will be BIG news. Why allow the guy on his way out to make that kind of noise in the industry?
The film starts filming next month. Expect the cast to be made public by mid-January at the latest. George Miller is talking his approach in the press, a start date is set as well as a finished script.
Just because things haven't gone the way WE like, doesn't mean squat in the end.
"And you'd be wrong. Not opinion, FACT"
Judging by the new article on the site, I would say it is you that is wrong.
"Judging by the new article on the site, I would say it is you that is wrong."
Judging by the tone of your posts, you're an Apologist fuck-wit. See how easy it is?
Watch when February 11th comes, genius. Then you can run to BlueNuts and be consoled by your fellow ilk. Talk about how "JLA is gunna be a trainwrek!". And "me and my family n frends is not gonna sport JLA!".
In-between handjobs, of course.
"Judging by the tone of your posts, you're an Apologist fuck-wit. See how easy it is?"
How easy it is? You just fucking ignored the fact that you were wrong. Everybody on here is praising this report about Singer as being gospel, and yet here you are completely ignoring the part about JLA.
But, I expect nothing less of you. You can't admit when you are wrong, and, when you are wrong, all you do is divert people's attention by attacking the person pointing out you are wrong.
You say this blog proves that Singer is off the project, well, by your logic, it also means that JLA is going to be delayed. Which means the poster was correct.
"How easy it is? You just fucking ignored the fact that you were wrong. Everybody on here is praising this report about Singer as being gospel, and yet here you are completely ignoring the part about JLA.
But, I expect nothing less of you. You can't admit when you are wrong, and, when you are wrong, all you do is divert people's attention by attacking the person pointing out you are wrong.
You say this blog proves that Singer is off the project, well, by your logic, it also means that JLA is going to be delayed. Which means the poster was correct."
First off, thanks for proving me correct, you Apologist dickhead.
Secondly, way to resort to a common asshole-tactic. So, the Blog writer can ONLY be right if BOTH statements are correct? Black & white and nothing else, right fucker?
Here, see if you can spot a HUGE difference moron:
"it is highly unlikely that Bryan Singer will return to shoot the next Superman movie"
"That movie will likely not be shot, however, until after the WGA strike is resolved."
I bet you CAN'T, because you're blinded by your Apologist glasses. That, and a few coats of jizz in your eyes.
Singerman is done, fag. Just because YOU won't admit it, doesn't mean us grown-ups don't know the TRUTH.
" bet you CAN'T, because you're blinded by your Apologist glasses. That, and a few coats of jizz in your eyes.
Singerman is done, fag. Just because YOU won't admit it, doesn't mean us grown-ups don't know the TRUTH."
Whether Singer is going to be the director or not is no concern to me. If they shelve MOS completely, it's of no concern to me, frankly I'm sick of all this shit.
But, what is of concern to me, is that you called out the poster for being wrong when all he did was say that he thinks the strike is having an effect on filming. And then, lo and behold, this blogger confirms that the strike IS IN FACT holding it up.
"So, the Blog writer can ONLY be right if BOTH statements are correct? Black & white and nothing else, right fucker?"
No, you stupid, lying, assmunching fuck. You CAN'T believe only the parts of this report to suit your own argument. That's called being a Hypocrit. You're an idiot and you proved it by that last comment. Everybody on here, apologist and hater alike, KNOWS you're an idiot. You run your mouth like you know what you're talking about and when you fuck up and make it obvious that you have no clue, you try and distract people from the fact by making fun of others.
You're the most pathetic piece of shit on this blog, and everybody knows it. And, deep down you know it too.
Did you honestly think that you could sit here and defend your argument by CHOOSING which part of this report to believe to suit your own purposes? Did you honestly think that nobody would call you out on it? Are you really that retarded? I know it runs in your family, but I had hoped it had skipped a generation. Apparantly I was wrong.
"Whether Singer is going to be the director or not is no concern to me. If they shelve MOS completely, it's of no concern to me, frankly I'm sick of all this shit."
Hey, swright, you fucking homo piece of shit, don't come here LYING your queen ass off. Your MASTER tells you to "care", so you "care".
"But, what is of concern to me, is that you called out the poster for being wrong when all he did was say that he thinks the strike is having an effect on filming. And then, lo and behold, this blogger confirms that the strike IS IN FACT holding it up."
"Fact"?? What "Fact" is there in regards to his OPINION, fuckwit? Because YOU say so? Jesus Christ, you are fucked in the head boy.
"No, you stupid, lying, assmunching fuck. You CAN'T believe only the parts of this report to suit your own argument. That's called being a Hypocrit. You're an idiot and you proved it by that last comment. Everybody on here, apologist and hater alike, KNOWS you're an idiot. You run your mouth like you know what you're talking about and when you fuck up and make it obvious that you have no clue, you try and distract people from the fact by making fun of others."
No clue, huh? Has February 11th come and past with NO JLA filming yet, queer? It hasn't?? Yet, I'M "wrong"? Did you hop in your hot pink VW time machine, and come back with little nuggets of future knowledge? Along with the future sperm of Younis and Bailey nestled away in your rotted guts?
Starting to realize how fucking STUPID you are compared to me? JLA IS going to be lensing when I said it would, swright. No more BS cock-sucking for you and Younis.
Oh, and it's HYPOCRITE, shit for brains.
"You're the most pathetic piece of shit on this blog, and everybody knows it. And, deep down you know it too."
So, you speak for EVERYBODY now, asshair? The fact that I FUCKED your ass up worse than "The Felcher" and Younis COMBINED makes me "pathetic"? Only to REtards like you and "superfag95". Both of you cumsluts somehow take a loss as a "victory".
"Did you honestly think that you could sit here and defend your argument by CHOOSING which part of this report to believe to suit your own purposes? Did you honestly think that nobody would call you out on it? Are you really that retarded? I know it runs in your family, but I had hoped it had skipped a generation. Apparantly I was wrong."
Of course you're wrong, you fucking idiot. Here's how it works, for those of us who have graduated junior high: When a person states something is HIGHLY UNLIKELY, it means just that. It is MORE THAN UNLIKELY, since you are s-l-o-w. Then, the same person said something is LIKELY. Which means it "could" be that way, but there is some "wiggle room" for them to be WRONG. She DIDN'T say: HIGHLY LIKELY, did she bitch? So you CAN take one as being more "solid" than the other. One statement carries more weight than the other, let's see if that 17 IQ of yours can decide which it is....Can you smell that, fuckhole? Smells like a KNOWLEDGE BURN, smack dab in the middle of your over-sized FOREHEAD.
And APPARENTLY you are trying to "project" your mental short-comings on me there, swright. You're no better of a writer than your 'mo buddy Bailey, asshole. Put down the nude pictures of Younis, take your hand out of your wet-pants, and pick up your 5th grade grammar book, ok cock-whore? You're making and even BIGGER fool of yourself.
"Hey, swright, you fucking homo piece of shit, don't come here LYING your queen ass off."
Actually, if you read my posts at the homepage you will see that it doesn't bother me if they don't do it. Especially if they get Welling.
"So, you speak for EVERYBODY now, asshair? "
No, I can't speak for you and the other 2 guys that run this blog.
I wonder if it's dawned on the other sheep here that they are being played by one of the blog runners?
"Actually, if you read my posts at the homepage you will see that it doesn't bother me if they don't do it. Especially if they get Welling."
In other words: Yes, ApologistPuncher, it is I, the sad-sack swright. I attempted to "fool" you into thinking I was just an anonymous Apologist shithead, when in actually I am Steve Younis and Neal "The Felcher" Bailey's concubine. Or cum-dumpster. Whichever you prefer.
"No, I can't speak for you and the other 2 guys that run this blog.
I wonder if it's dawned on the other sheep here that they are being played by one of the blog runners?"
Ah, I FUCK him up about him trying to "prove" that I was "wrong", and what does he do? He attempts to derail it with a strawman argument. Guess what, fecal debris? You would be "Wrooooong!!" again.
Let me get back to the lesson you were being ass-fucked with:
"Of course you're wrong, you fucking idiot. Here's how it works, for those of us who have graduated junior high: When a person states something is HIGHLY UNLIKELY, it means just that. It is MORE THAN UNLIKELY, since you are s-l-o-w. Then, the same person said something is LIKELY. Which means it "could" be that way, but there is some "wiggle room" for them to be WRONG. She DIDN'T say: HIGHLY LIKELY, did she bitch? So you CAN take one as being more "solid" than the other. One statement carries more weight than the other, let's see if that 17 IQ of yours can decide which it is....Can you smell that, fuckhole? Smells like a KNOWLEDGE BURN, smack dab in the middle of your over-sized FOREHEAD."
Do your homework, then come back with an INTELLIGENT answer, you disgusting pervert. I heard about you & Younis on New Year's. A fucking HAMMER DRILL? Are you SERIOUS??
Why should I deny it when you can see my IP address like the others who run the blog?
"Why should I deny it when you can see my IP address like the others who run the blog?"
And just like that, the little fairy-bitch tosses in the white towel.....
It was good kicking you around again, swright. Sadly, your pathetic "novelty" here has come to an end.
Don't let the doorknob enter your loose anus on the way out.
"And just like that, the little fairy-bitch tosses in the white towel....."
Didn't say I was tossing in the towel. You'll hear from me again when you make a stupid ass comment. Which, I'm sure won't be long.
"Didn't say I was tossing in the towel. You'll hear from me again when you make a stupid ass comment. Which, I'm sure won't be long."
Yep, "superfag95" and swright: Cut from the same "cloth". A semen-stained cloth, but the same one nonetheless. Nice attempt at taking a beating and somehow in your "mind" twisting it into a "victory". You sure showed me, dickless!
Doesn't matter if you say the words, your sissy-ass refusal to admit you got fucked AGAIN is "towel tossing" enough.
What's sad is, you fucking wretches at the HomoPage somehow think you are superior to those here at this Blog. But here's a "reality check" for you: I have never posted at the HomoPage. Not ONCE in my lifetime. Guess what three fag's CAN'T stay away from here?
We win.
Post a Comment