Wednesday, January 10, 2007

Good Writing to Get Rid of Bad Writing

I was contacted recently by some people who have started up a letter-writing campaign to oust Singer and his cronies and change the direction of the Superman movie franchise . They advocate even doing a "Hulk-like" reboot where they wait a couple years for everything to die down and then go in a new direction if that's what it takes to get it right. Since the film is a disappointment both artistically and financially, and there seems to be some internal difference of opinion with the franchise, and no firm commitment has been made to a Singerman sequel at this point other than Singer signing on to do a script, I thought this could be just the right time for something like this to get some attention.

Their approach is a bit different than what you've seen here at SSS. They advocate more of a "use honey for the bears" approach, whereas we've been known to just beat the hell out of the bear with a stick. Their site is dedicated to taking a more positive approach to contacting the powers that be at WB, namely Alan Horn and Jeff Robinov, and relaying their disappointment and dissatisfaction with the film in a professional manner. Their website is just up and running and in blog format. It basically just lays out their mission statement, and provides updates, commentaries, and some sample letters that you can use. Their also appears to be an email list of some kind.

Personally I've already fired off a letter to both Horn and Robinov. At first I tried using my trusty Singerman Kryptonite pen however anytime I tried writing the words "action" the pen stopped working, go figure. In all seriousness, I know people have been writing letters to W.B. since the film unspooled back in June, but now might not be a bad time to fire off another one to hammer the point home to the people in the "ivory tower."

97 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thanks SSS. In these days when comic fans are being suppressed by Singer's apologist army, I'm extremely proud to stand up and say I'm with you 100% on your mission to show these studios we weren't satified. You're an inspiration to myself and probably anyone who's ever read and loved a superman comic book. You're being crucified like superman, oops, I mean jesus every time you post one of these but you keep on posting. That's the way to do it. Well done.

I absolutely agree that the writing was the biggest problem with the film since most of it was just cut and paste. Thank god someone at WB is realizing that was a poor decision.

Anonymous said...

damn my spelling... Next time I'll proof-read.

Anonymous said...

Send your letters....But I doubt they will have any effect. Hell they probably are already screening the shit letters out. Not that yours will be shit, but you get my drift.

Anonymous said...

Dear Mr Horn,

Singer is a FAG and Superman Returns was gay.

Anonymous said...

SSS will sell out and jump on the bandwagon when production really gets started.

"Superman Returns though underperform will make a great sequel" - Varity

Anonymous said...

"SSS will sell out and jump on the bandwagon when production really gets started."

Yes, because the project has been "greenlit", right? Is that what you idiot "Apologists" are claiming now?

Here's a prediction you can BANK on: These mentally deficient "Apologists" will CONTINUE to come here and get verbally spanked, until the day their deity BS "drops out".

Anonymous said...

It actually saddens me to walk into my local Blockbuster and see literally every copy of the latest Superman movie(dozens)still sitting on the shelves. Superman and his fans deserved better, they've earnt it for cryin out loud, and potential fans of a new generation would obviously stay at home and watch "Smallville" than rather hire the latest big screen adaption. Word of mouth has killed it.

Anonymous said...

Dude, It's already rented close to 45 million dollars and it's been out for a month and a half. Of course it's still going to be there during the week, and hell even the weekend.

Oh and POTC has the same thing happening.

Joel1245 said...

Regardless, it's clear that enough people didn't care for the movie and that WB didn't make what they were hoping to make on it.

I was excited about the movie when it came out. I grew up with Christopher Reeve and was very excited that Singer was making a semi-sequel. I was very positive about it and supported it even after the suit designs and first picture came out.

However,with that said, I left the theater after having watched SR for the first time with a weird feeling. I wanted to like SR, but there were too many things about the movie that left me with a "blah" feeling. I went back to see it a second time a few weeks later just to see if it was better the second time, but it wasn't. I wanted to like the movie, but again, just had "so so" feeling about it.

I even bought the DVD, but I have to admit that I'll probably be watching Superman The Movie and Superman II more often than I'll watch SR. The movie left me with a feeling of not really hating it, but not really loving it either.

Joel1245 said...

Clarification: When I said I "grew up with Christopher Reeve", I meant to say that I grew up watching Christopher Reeve in the Superman films. The way I said it though made it sound like I was a childhood friend of his - which I wasn't.


However, that would have been cool. :)

Anonymous said...

Ahh you haters will love what singer does next. He improved on X-men he will improve on this. Honestly he has added several layers to a boring character. All you suposed fans should look at the comics from the 50s and 60s - I mean Jimmy Olsen Superman's Pal and Lois Lane Superman's girlfriend those stories were horrible if you base superman off the comices he is a horrific hero. Bryan singer just humanized him and you just cant stand a human character....go play a video game you whiny haters!!!!

Anonymous said...

"Ahh you haters will love what singer does next. He improved on X-men he will improve on this. Honestly he has added several layers to a boring character. All you suposed fans should look at the comics from the 50s and 60s - I mean Jimmy Olsen Superman's Pal and Lois Lane Superman's girlfriend those stories were horrible if you base superman off the comices he is a horrific hero. Bryan singer just humanized him and you just cant stand a human character....go play a video game you whiny haters!!!!"

Translation: "I'm a fucking retard with the mental abilities and spelling habits of a 3 year old!!!!"

Anonymous said...

you and Singer have the same problems, you dont realize they've actually made comics since the 1960's. First get a clue, then get some comics from the 80's, and 90's then when you come back perhaps you wont sound like such an assclown...

Anonymous said...

Nah, he's an "Apologist". They ARE assclown's.

Anonymous said...

You'd think all it would take for the suits at Warners to see Returns as the misfire it is would be for them to watch the display of arrogant, money wasting self indulgence that is the making of doco, or Singer's video diaries.

The "auteur" that is Singer can also be seen literally acting out virtually every scene for his performers, taking "direction" to a new level of arrogance.

...and is it me but a cornfield in New South Wales may look like a cornfield in Kansas, and New York certainly looks to me like Metropolis....but no matter how hard you try, Sydney looks like Sydney

Anonymous said...

"...and is it me but a cornfield in New South Wales may look like a cornfield in Kansas, and New York certainly looks to me like Metropolis....but no matter how hard you try, Sydney looks like Sydney"

I don't agree with that at all SR sets and location scouting i thought were all very well done.

Anonymous said...

"I don't agree with that at all SR sets and location scouting i thought were all very well done."

Obviously never seen Sydney, or an ANZ ATM either. Nice grammar, btw.

I'm amazed at the amount of folk prepared to accept and even defend sub standard product. The thought that someone, anyone, other than Singer may do a better job is outrageous to them.

Anonymous said...

"Nice grammar, btw."

Nice insult dingleberry, how dare you disagree with me you know what your spelling sucks asshole. Yeah I bet you had that guy crying in his beer.

Anonymous said...

That IS how you spell "grammar"!

Hilarious

Anonymous said...

What's Hillarious is that you hater just insult. You may not like Superman Returns but you have to admit you saw it. You have contributed to Singer coming back. Then you have no one to hate but yourselves. Beat that logic moron. Unless you rather beat your meat dreaming about maybe one day you may talk to a girl.

Anonymous said...

^that qualifies as "logic?"

Anonymous said...

Can't argue with that, you bought the ticket. If the movie was so bad why did you see it? Do you always see bad movies? You must have seen Basic Instinct 2 then. Boy you haters sure is stupid....where were you edumacated? ahahahahhahahaha.....wow this is easy with stupid people.

Anonymous said...

"What's Hillarious is that you hater just insult. You may not like Superman Returns but you have to admit you saw it. You have contributed to Singer coming back. Then you have no one to hate but yourselves. Beat that logic moron. Unless you rather beat your meat dreaming about maybe one day you may talk to a girl."

Retarded "Apologist" in a nutshell.

Opens his jackass-ery stating "all you can do is insult", then ends it with a tired, weak insult of his OWN. They ALWAYS contradict themselves, and are too fucking stupid to realize it.

Anonymous said...

"Can't argue with that, you bought the ticket. If the movie was so bad why did you see it? Do you always see bad movies? You must have seen Basic Instinct 2 then. Boy you haters sure is stupid....where were you edumacated? ahahahahhahahaha.....wow this is easy with stupid people."

You're right, seeing as how your mother is stupid AND easy.

And who says anyone bought a ticket? Bootlegs sure are convenient when it comes to pieces of shit like Singerman Peeps. You can piss all over a bootleg when you're done watching. Not so easy in a theater.

Anonymous said...

I actually bought tickets to Devil Wear Prada the night I went to see Singerman, so I didnt support jack shit of Singers.

You should be thankful though that some of us who actually like Superman and have a clue about the character actually did pay to see Singerman or his box office numbers would've been even worse than they already were....

Anonymous said...

Interestingly enough the haters just slung mud as usual did not refute the point about buying a ticket. And anyone who admits they rather see the devil wears prada is either gay or PW. If it is a girl makes sense why she didnt like returns.

Anonymous said...

what exactly does the fact that they bought a ticket refute about Singerman being a piece of shit? You never paid to see a film that you thought was bad afterwards?

Anonymous said...

But if word of mouth was as bad as haters say no one would have seen it. You were dropped on your head as a child were'nt you. If S4(a superman movie with bad word of mouth) made 15 Million and by mulitplying by 4 for inflation etc. thats 60 Million. So if Superman returns made 60 million it would have been a bomb. But Superman RETURNS MADE ALMOST 4 TIMES AS MUCH DOMESTICALLY. Therefore...Conclusion(look it up dummy)...Superman Returns had a good word of mouth and was a decent movie. Boy you haters are dumb just give it up you can not match my logic.

Anonymous said...

"But if word of mouth was as bad as haters say no one would have seen it. You were dropped on your head as a child were'nt you. If S4(a superman movie with bad word of mouth) made 15 Million and by mulitplying by 4 for inflation etc. thats 60 Million. So if Superman returns made 60 million it would have been a bomb. But Superman RETURNS MADE ALMOST 4 TIMES AS MUCH DOMESTICALLY. Therefore...Conclusion(look it up dummy)...Superman Returns had a good word of mouth and was a decent movie. Boy you haters are dumb just give it up you can not match my logic."

Why even bother with this brain-dead piece of shit? Isn't the fact he LIKES this turd proof enough that he is a moron?

The retard goes and compare Singerman Peeps to Superman IV as a way to "prove" it wasn't the failure it so clearly was?

And to top it off, an "Apologist" of all people makes a homophobic slander? Talk about the pot calling the kettle a pot.

Anonymous said...

See you can not dispute my logic. Its great. Hey anyone can hate a movie, but sometimes like the above poster you are in a minority. The loser above all he does is throw around vulgarity and can not make one point. Maybe his potty mouth should be washed out with soap. :-)

Anonymous said...

"See you can not dispute my logic. Its great. Hey anyone can hate a movie, but sometimes like the above poster you are in a minority. The loser above all he does is throw around vulgarity and can not make one point. Maybe his potty mouth should be washed out with soap. :-)"

Yep, like I said a fucking moron. It really is fun to laugh at retards like this. How stupid do you have to be to have CONVINCED yourself that Singerman Peeps was NOT a flop? Pretty fucking stupid.

And I wash your mom's mouth out with sperm every night.

Anonymous said...

Considering my mom is dead makes you one sick fuck...but hey I gues necrophilia is your thang! Beside that Movie was not a Posiden flop though it was not the sky rocket blockbuster it was suposed to be. Considering a Dunderhead like you bought a ticket and supported the franchise (I dont consider you smart enough to know how to get a bootleg) if you didnt like it you and the rest of the haters can email and write to WB. I worked so well for Star Wars. Maybe then you should change and accept what was put forward.

Anonymous said...

"Considering my mom is dead makes you one sick fuck...but hey I gues necrophilia is your thang! Beside that Movie was not a Posiden flop though it was not the sky rocket blockbuster it was suposed to be. Considering a Dunderhead like you bought a ticket and supported the franchise (I dont consider you smart enough to know how to get a bootleg) if you didnt like it you and the rest of the haters can email and write to WB. I worked so well for Star Wars. Maybe then you should change and accept what was put forward."

Nice try, shithead. The old "my mommy is dead" bullshit doesn't work. I guess if my mom was a fat, smelly $.05 whore I would claim she was dead too.

These "Apologist" idiots, as unbelievable as it seems, are actually getting even MORE stupid as each day passes. This moron thinks he has "logic".

Then again, he thinks Singerman Peeps was "good", so nothing surprises me.

Anonymous said...

Wow great way to defend your necrophilia but not sure if listerine can wash out the smell of rotten pie. Lets see didnt dispute my point so makes me right then. You are probably the person who love phantom mess and hated the original trilogy. Now using my superior mind here is your response.....you will insult my dead mother again saying you love to have sex with dead people then insult people who like the movie then reiterate how bad the movie is with no fact to back you up....See your easy to predict and thus easy to control like an animal. Lash out on people who don't agree with you...makes you a dictator...and fun to mess with.:-)

Anonymous said...

"Wow great way to defend your necrophilia but not sure if listerine can wash out the smell of rotten pie. Lets see didnt dispute my point so makes me right then. You are probably the person who love phantom mess and hated the original trilogy. Now using my superior mind here is your response.....you will insult my dead mother again saying you love to have sex with dead people then insult people who like the movie then reiterate how bad the movie is with no fact to back you up....See your easy to predict and thus easy to control like an animal. Lash out on people who don't agree with you...makes you a dictator...and fun to mess with.:-)"

Ahh, brain-dead thinks HE is messing with ME? I actually laughed out loud when I read this post. Stupidity TRULY knows no bounds. And proper grammar either.

But here's a lesson for this fuckwad, who wants to pull out decades-old movies to prove a "point":

Superman The Movie
Budget: $55 million
Domestic: $134,218,018
Foreign: $166,000,000
Total: $300,218,018

Take that DOMESTIC total, times it by four as shit for brains did, and it comes to: $536,872,072. Wow, kind of puts it in perspective doesn't it? All that adding comes to one undeniable FACT for Singerman Peeps: F-L-O-P.

Anonymous said...

Anybody else think these two are the same person? This just smells like a fake arguement.

Anonymous said...

"Take that DOMESTIC total, times it by four as shit for brains did, and it comes to: $536,872,072."

STM domestic with inflation comes in today in the 370 mil range. With inflation Superman 2 is about 255 mil so SR sits in 3rd place when you factor all that in of the Superman movies.

Anonymous said...

"You can piss all over a bootleg when you're done watching. Not so easy in a theater."


Plus the projectionist would get annoyed

Anonymous said...

you know desperation has set in for the Singerites when they start using Quest for Peace as an example of why Singerman was "successful." Give them a couple more weeks and they'll be using "Gigli"

Anonymous said...

You know Superman Returns did much better then Gigli. And it didnt break up a relationship.

Voice-of_Reason said...

actually according to Kate Bolemia err Bosworth it did break up her and Orlando Bloom. There's a posting about on this blog, look under the Kate Bowsorth tags

Anonymous said...

Oh yeah....but Superman Returns still rocks!!!!!

Anonymous said...

"you know desperation has set in for the Singerites when they start using Quest for Peace as an example of why Singerman was "successful." Give them a couple more weeks and they'll be using "Gigli"

If that was an attempted shot at me all i was doing was correcting the other posters inaccurate assertions about the films inflation numbers. I made no reference at all to SR being some big hit i just gave you the numbers.

Anonymous said...

"Ahh you haters will love what singer does next. He improved on X-men he will improve on this. Honestly he has added several layers to a boring character. All you suposed fans should look at the comics from the 50s and 60s - I mean Jimmy Olsen Superman's Pal and Lois Lane Superman's girlfriend those stories were horrible if you base superman off the comices he is a horrific hero. Bryan singer just humanized him and you just cant stand a human character....go play a video game you whiny haters!!!!"

Hahaha. You're right, people didn't go to see this turkey because "Superman" was in the title did they? Are you kidding me? That's exactly why the film took in a respectable BO take the first week. After two weeks the film began to plummet out of the top twenty. Why? Because the people that actually like Superman and saw the film the first day (me included), not only were offended by the raping of the great American hero, but they told their friends about it. The people that did like it must have been asleep during any sequence that didn't look like a cartoon.

If this film was even close to the comics it would have been much more of a hit, and (gasp) fun to watch. Boo to this completely banal argument.

P.S. Can any appologist here really tell me they had fun watching Superman Returns? Oh and that crack about "Superman's pal Jimmy Olsen"- who they hell did you think was in this movie? I think during one scene he even had a little tie- but I can't be sure, as I don't watch this crap everyday and masterbate to it.

-cgeer15

Anonymous said...

"STM domestic with inflation comes in today in the 370 mil range. With inflation Superman 2 is about 255 mil so SR sits in 3rd place when you factor all that in of the Superman movies."

Read the post again where it states I was using the first moron's scenario. Since he, and I suspect you, are "Apologists", common-sense isn't a strong suit.

Anonymous said...

"P.S. Can any appologist here really tell me they had fun watching Superman Returns? "

Which apologists are you referring to? The Singer apologists or the "The Movie Sucked" apologists?

Anonymous said...

" Can any appologist here really tell me they had fun watching Superman Returns?"

Honestly? Yes...Because it reminded me of when I first saw the first Superman movie. Yeah it shouldn't have reminded me as much as it did, but it did. I'm also not that attached to the comic books and any one interpretation of the character. Do I wish there was more action and that he fought somebody? Yes. But it was an enjoyable movie to me. It has it's flaws, no doubt about it, but I never let a movie's flaws affect how I view a movie, unless to me, they are too big. And for me SR's flaws weren't that gigantic.

Anonymous said...

"And for me SR's flaws weren't that gigantic."

And there, in a nutshell, is the problem with "Apologists" and their "leader" BS. They don't respect or KNOW the character enough to see how WRONG most of his choices were.

If having Singerman peep on Lois and her lover having an intimate, PRIVATE conversation is not a "gigantic" flaw to you, you don't know Superman. Giving Singerman an ilegitimate child without explaining how or when he was conceived, and not consider it a flaw, you don't know Superman. Having Singerman at one point be so powerless when Kryptonite is around that he can't even make a fist to defend himself, then turn around a few minutes later and let him lift an ENTIRE continent of it into space WITH Kryptonite INSIDE HIS BODY and not think this was a "gigantic" flaw, you again do not know Superman.

And I can guarantee the responses will include "in the comics Kryptonite blah, blah, blah". But remember this kids:

"I'm also not that attached to the comic books".

Anonymous said...

"Which apologists are you referring to? The Singer apologists or the "The Movie Sucked" apologists?"

What an assinine question from an obvious "Apologist".

Anonymous said...

Next Superman Has More Baddies?

Michael Dougherty, co-writer of last year's Superman Returns, told SCI FI Wire that the upcoming sequel will feature at least one villain drawn from the DC Comics franchise. Or more than one? "Maybe," Dougherty said coyly in an interview on the set of his upcoming supernatural horror film Trick 'r Treat in Vancouver, Canada, on Jan. 15. "It's [Mr.] Myxyzptlk," he added, with tongue in cheek.

Dougherty said that it's likely he and his Superman Returns writing partner Dan Harris will again work with Singer on the sequel. "We're talking," Dougherty said. "We're bouncing ideas around with Bryan. Big ideas. Action-packed ideas."

Singer has said the next installment will be along the lines of the second Star Trek film, and Dougherty said the comparison is apt. "I think it's going to be a more action-oriented film," he said. "Again, the easy comparison to make was [X-Men] to X2, or Star Trek [The Motion Picture] to Star Trek II. I mean, I know that Bryan has said he's going to Wrath of Khan it, and by that he means, 'Let's take what we've already established—we've gotten that out of the way—and let's just make it shorter, tighter and more action-packed." —Patrick Lee, News Editor

Anonymous said...

"Dougherty said that it's likely he and his Superman Returns writing partner Dan Harris will again work with Singer.."

The fact he DOESN'T know if he is or isn't writing more turd-worthy bullshit is a good sign for those with good taste. Means a sequel to this garbage ISN'T as "sure" as most "Apologists" think.

How many times have they claimed BS was "writing" the sequel right now? In the words of Lex Lamer from Singerman Peeps: "WRONG!!".

Anonymous said...

"Read the post again where it states I was using the first moron's scenario. Since he, and I suspect you, are "Apologists", common-sense isn't a strong suit."

Why are you insulting me i did not say one thing offensive to you at all. You did not post the correct inflation numbers and neither did the other poster so i posted them that is all. BTW an apologist is someone who is defending a point of view so your excuses for hating the film make you just as much an apologist as someone who cites reasons for loving it.

Anonymous said...

"Why are you insulting me i did not say one thing offensive to you at all. You did not post the correct inflation numbers and neither did the other poster so i posted them that is all. BTW an apologist is someone who is defending a point of view so your excuses for hating the film make you just as much an apologist as someone who cites reasons for loving it."

You are 100% WRONG on your account of an "Apologist", genius. Pointing out what is obvious to those with a brain is not "defending". That's what you idiots do.

And no one asked for the "correct" numbers, since he obviously was a moron in his calculations. But because it made Singerman Peeps "look better" you lowered the figures. Just like an "Apologist" ass-wipe.

Anonymous said...

"You are 100% WRONG on your account of an "Apologist", genius. Pointing out what is obvious to those with a brain is not "defending". That's what you idiots do."

You hating SR is an opinion it is not fact. People who loved it is an opinion it is not a fact. Therefore anyone engaging in defense of either side is being an apologist. That is what it means insulting me won't change how wrong you are.

Anonymous said...

"You hating SR is an opinion it is not fact. People who loved it is an opinion it is not a fact. Therefore anyone engaging in defense of either side is being an apologist. That is what it means insulting me won't change how wrong you are."

Except, you mental-midget, we don't "defend" our opinions. We STATE them. "Apologists" "defend" the movie and their opinions of it. THAT is what makes you idiot "Apologists" tick.

You can't handle a contrary opinion because you are insecure about how bad you KNOW this turd was.

Anonymous said...

"BTW an apologist is someone who is defending a point of view so your excuses for hating the film make you just as much an apologist as someone who cites reasons for loving it."

Yes many of the haters of the film on this BLOG seemed to adopt this term as a means of describing the fans of the film. Problem is they clearly did not bother to look up what it actually means because as you said it applies to them as well.

Anonymous said...

"Yes many of the haters of the film on this BLOG seemed to adopt this term as a means of describing the fans of the film. Problem is they clearly did not bother to look up what it actually means because as you said it applies to them as well."

What a fucking "Apologist" moron.

Hey, shit-for-brains, that term has described you assholes since BEFORE this turd came out. Deal with it or shut the fuck up.

Anonymous said...

"Hey, shit-for-brains, that term has described you assholes since BEFORE this turd came out. Deal with it or shut the fuck up."

Buddy you don't know what the fucking word means. The other poster is hitting you with the facts and you are just insulting him because you are mad that he proved you wrong, DEAL WITH THAT!!

Anonymous said...

"Buddy you don't know what the fucking word means. The other poster is hitting you with the facts and you are just insulting him because you are mad that he proved you wrong, DEAL WITH THAT!!"

Hey, fucking "Apologist" bitch, I know EXACTLY what it means, seeing as how I'm not a brainless shitwad like you.

You fucking pansies go around trying to "Defend" this turd everywhere you can, and you are too fucking STUPID to realize by BEING HERE you PROVE you are an "Apologist".

It's too easy sometimes with these little retards.

Anonymous said...

This "Appologist" term argument is asinine. Let's just assume for argument's sake that on every single other web-site out there the people on this page are considered, "Trolls." And everyone who defends this piece of garbage movie are "Appologists." They are terms that float around and come to bunch people in groups. It's okay if you don't agree with the term, but this page is about the MOVIE, people are missing that point and getting caught in a stupid argument about a word.

The page is SSS! If someone wanted to call those who liked this film "Appologists", or "Reindeer," for these purposes the argument would be completely the same. To argue the use of the word is like trying to call all of those that hated this flick "Reindeer" also.

-cgeer15

Anonymous said...

"BTW an apologist is someone who is defending a point of view so your excuses for hating the film make you just as much an apologist as someone who cites reasons for loving it."

Actually, although I didn't care for SR myself, the person who made this statement above is correct. An "apologist" in the usual sense of the word just means a person who is making a defense or arguing a case. That word alone doesn't have any negative connotation.

voice_of_reason said...

how can people who disliked Singerman be "apologists?" What are we defending or apologizing for? Nothing. It's the Singerites who are defending this piece of crap and makign excuses left and right for it's all around disappointing track record. thus they are "aplogists." Thats a common term used to describe anyone who tries to defend something that sucks in sports, entertainment, etc.

Anonymous said...

no on here is "defending" anything, we're attacking it

Anonymous said...

Exactly, but it's easier for "Apologists" to say: "I know you are but what am I?".

And they are "Bryan Singer Apologists". THAT is where the negative connotation comes from.

Anonymous said...

Why we have nothing to apologize. This movie made a bundle. It is moving on and in preproduction. Superman Returns sequel is a fact. There is no question that DC like Marvel is moving on. Haters when the sequel opens up I will be on line before you farting in your face....WE WIN.....SINGER IS THE MAN....

Anonymous said...

"Why we have nothing to apologize. This movie made a bundle. It is moving on and in preproduction. Superman Returns sequel is a fact. There is no question that DC like Marvel is moving on. Haters when the sequel opens up I will be on line before you farting in your face....WE WIN.....SINGER IS THE MAN...."

See, what planet does this asshole live on where a sequel is "fact"? And "made a bundle"?? Jesus, I thought they were stupid BEFORE this shithead posted. Must be a "Captain" in the "Apologist" army.

On top of that, he claims it is in "preproduction". When 1/2 of the idiot twins, Dougherty, says they will "probably" write more bs with BS? Even that fuckhead doesn't even know!

Anonymous said...

It is in preproduction loser! I have a friend at the WB thats already plan to work on the project....you just can't admit it was a good movie can you? Give it up you can whine all you want but the movie is being made whether you like it or not? How do you like them bananas loser. Thats right i am a god.

Anonymous said...

"I have a friend"

This statement right there PROVES he is a LIAR. NO ONE would be friends with an obvious retard like him.

And then the fucking reject goes and PROVES it AGAIN when he says: "plan to work on the project". Hey, fucking genius, how can something be IN "preproduction", but then only "planning" to do it?

God, this stupid fucker BETTER be forced to wear a helmet, before he hurts himself and/or others.

Anonymous said...

Plan because he is on the construction team retard! There are no sets now dummy!
Believe what you wish, but when this movie is in filming you can cry with your mommy!
All stories related prove I am right even SSS has to agree with me!
Deal with it you lost, Superman Returns again 2009!

Anonymous said...

You really are PATHETIC. See, here's a lesson to a fucking moron like you: Until a sequel is GREENLIT there is NO "preproduction".

You are probably the fucking stupidest "Apologist" I have ever seen. And that is saying a LOT.

Anonymous said...

What's not green lite?

Singer involved ------------>Check
Writers engaged Sequel ---->Check
WB has it on its schedule--->Check
Budget set ------------>Check
Actors locked ------------>Check

Whats left fool is just building the sets and filming. Who is the moron now? You and SS are just as stupids as you come I can see it now when Singer is filming.

You -"just because they are filming doesnt mean the film is being made...duh whats my name again...duh"

Anonymous said...

Singer involved ------------>Check
Writers engaged Sequel ---->Check
WB has it on its schedule--->Check
Budget set ------------>Check
Actors locked ------------>Check

Dude, I'm considered an apologist and even I know that the only one you can check off is Singer (and that could change, but he has been signed to produce a script)

The writers haven't signed a deal, it's not on the WB's schedule (They are planning on it coming out in 09, but there is no hard release date)

The budget is not set. Right now there are only rumors as to what the budget will be. Most people think that it will be about 180 million or so.

The actors are all signed, but WB's holds options. They can change actors if they wish (they won't, but until BR or the others announces that they are going to begin filming it isn't set in stone)

Anonymous said...

Hey, leave the kid alone. He's on a mission to PROVE how STUPID he is.

And he was successful...

Anonymous said...

ahhh you will all see and then you will call me master......

Anonymous said...

Yeah, anybody who takes the word of this ass-clown is as stupid as he is.

Anonymous said...

You know you guys should really check out the SR IMDB Board. The fan trolls there are so stupid and deluded it's beyond belief.
BTW, Singerman=Shit on a stick

Anonymous said...

I used to post on IMDB all of the time after this flick came out, but I got tired of all the mudslinging... hmm...

-cgeer15

Anonymous said...

"ahhh you will all see and then you will call me master......"

...bater

Anonymous said...

Regardless of what you call me the movie is a go. Go ahead call me dumb, stupid, whatever. Read the headlines you illiterate prick and weep since Superman Returns II in 2009. What do you say about that?

Anonymous said...

In an interview with the Washington Post, Bryan Singer discussed a scene that was in an early draft of the screenplay but never filmed: "At one point," the director recalls, "I had a scene in the script which I never shot, and I probably was never going to shoot, where Superman would be standing -- after flying around rescuing people at night -- would be standing at dawn at Ground Zero. Sort of standing there, almost as if to say, 'If I had been here, this might not be.'"

Proof that singer had his hands tied by excutives. He will Knock the next one out of the park thankful since this movie was a success.

Anonymous said...

LOL, what afucking idiot. "Proof he had his hands tied by executives"? Did you read your OWN post, moron?

Here's a clue to PROVE you are as stupid as you seem: "and I probably was never going to shoot". See, he said that HIMSELF.

Anonymous said...

"Regardless of what you call me the movie is a go. Go ahead call me dumb, stupid, whatever. Read the headlines you illiterate prick and weep since Superman Returns II in 2009. What do you say about that?"

I say quit getting your news off of the message board at Bluetights.net, asshole. Corporate shills there.

No sequel has been greenlit, as has ALREADY been proven. But you're a fucking retard, so keep spewing forth your made-up bullshit.

Anonymous said...

EXCLUSIVE tidbit on sequel plan from one of the writers...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*This is written in a more coherent way of understanding than what I was presented with. However I must stress that no facts have been altered of changed and nothing has been added to make it more interesting. Just fixed the grammar up a bit. * ---> read on --->

Dan Harris-


Spoiler!!! Click to Read!:
"Fans are being pretty consistent on who they'd like to see in a sequel. To me, we go with a villain smarter than Lex even. I think we're (Dan, and Michael) on the same page. A villain that appears believable in being the brains behind a big operation."


also


Spoiler!!! Click to Read!:
"Lex is a great manipulator, he can sway some public opinion. He may leave that island finding himself in a new house"

See improving on the original formula. Argue what you will here is the scoop i found.

Anonymous said...

Tristan and his grandad came into my work today. Tristan is visiting his grandparents here for Christmas. We all got his autograph and he is a wonderful, cute, and funny kid in person. Anyways, I asked Tristan some questions about the upcoming movie. Although it is in pre-production, I can confirm Tristan will fly in the next movie. His grandad said they had built a harness and the stunt coordinator said it was the smallest harness he had ever seen. They had Tristan up over 25 feet in the air and his parents were on the ground scared to death. The grandad said Tristan looked down and waved saying "Hi mommy!" really excited. That is the latest news and the grandad comes in about once a month to give us an update. If and when I learn something new...I will continue to post here.

Here is another scoop. The kid returns read and weep. Event SSS cant refute this

Anonymous said...

Jesus Christ, now whenever these fucking idiots post, the IQ level drops TREMENDOUSLY.

I GUARANTEE this asshole copied & pasted from Bluetights.net. You know, the 100% non-shill whore for WB and BS? No way ANYONE would make-up bullshit there.

Anonymous said...

They haven't even begun to actually write the script...How would they know if he is going to fly or not?

I'll wait until I see a reputable news outlet report this besides anonymous on the SSS blog.

No Offense.

Anonymous said...

Best Visual Effects
"Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest"
"Poseidon"
"Superman Returns"

HA Superman got nominated for an Oscar.....laugh at that fools. See you weep in 2009 when the man returns. Haters from this day forth you will be know as Denialists.

Anonymous said...

"Best Visual Effects
"Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest"
"Poseidon"
"Superman Returns"

HA Superman got nominated for an Oscar.....laugh at that fools. See you weep in 2009 when the man returns. Haters from this day forth you will be know as Denialists."

Ok, you stupid fucking retard, see Poseidon in there? Yeah, REALLY backs-up your argument, doesn't it?

It's sad, this tool from Bluetights probably thinks he's "showing" us and bragging to the other pieces of shit there. He's too fucking clueless to realize he gets TROUNCED every time he posts.

His parents must REALLY be proud of this shit-for-brains.

Anonymous said...

Hey retard! When you get nominated is for outstanding effort in your area not how much money you made. Superman Returns made a bundle and everyone over at Blue tights, Superhero hype, and others laugh at this site since it is such a joke. This site is dying it gets updated less and less. Superman will return and you losers will have no choice but to jump on board or be left behind.

Anonymous said...

"Hey retard! When you get nominated is for outstanding effort in your area not how much money you made. Superman Returns made a bundle and everyone over at Blue tights, Superhero hype, and others laugh at this site since it is such a joke. This site is dying it gets updated less and less. Superman will return and you losers will have no choice but to jump on board or be left behind."

Yes indeed, this fucker really IS that stupid! And I must be fucking Nostradamus, predicting this cum-stain was from Bluetights.

"Made a bundle"?? Jesus, the stupidity level in this 12 year old is ASTOUNDING.

Anonymous said...

Regardless SSS has been AWOL. His arguements grow stale and the movie production moves on. While asshole above slings vulgarity around like and AIDS infected pussy he is, the mass support Singers vision and you Denialists will continue to be blind of facts and the future before you. Hey Denailist shit for brains do you honestly think with Marvel slamming out movies and making money that WB will back down? Are you realy that stupid. You must be SSS. Singer vision lives deal with it. Come over to right side of the track and realize this website is dead.

Anonymous said...

"Regardless SSS has been AWOL. His arguements grow stale and the movie production moves on. While asshole above slings vulgarity around like and AIDS infected pussy he is, the mass support Singers vision and you Denialists will continue to be blind of facts and the future before you. Hey Denailist shit for brains do you honestly think with Marvel slamming out movies and making money that WB will back down? Are you realy that stupid. You must be SSS. Singer vision lives deal with it. Come over to right side of the track and realize this website is dead."

Now this brainless fuck is COPYING me. How fucking sad.

I guess he believes if he keeps repeating the same LIES over and over, SOMEONE will believe him.

The elementary school should suspend his computer priviliges.

Anonymous said...

I don't copy fools just smack them down like i just did you! Trust me I am right no one else has posted the facts like I have. Denialists are blind thoughtless creatures that can easily be manipulated. You and your one man crusade has ended. Singer is the director, Superman lives, and there is nothing you pea brain can do to stop it.

BTW I have a PHD you rotten Vulva. Now I know why this board is the laughing stock of the internet.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, this fucking lame-brain uses MY insults, but "doesn't copy". Right, fuckhead.

And you can't even SPELL PhD, let alone GET one. Fucking kids should be BANNED from the internets.

S.S.S. said...

Rumors of my demise have been GREATLY exaggerated.

Anonymous said...

"Rumors of my demise have been GREATLY exaggerated."

Well how much longer do you expect to keep this up the sequel is not out until 2009? I guess when they approve a script, whatever info you can find about it you can spend 50 posts trying to tear it apart but that is about it.

Anonymous said...

Hey, did anyone notice that "The Devil Wears Prada While Kicking Superman Returns Ass" kicked it's ass AGAIN in Oscar nom's?

TDWPWKSRA: 3
Singerman Peeps: 1