Saturday, February 09, 2008

Strike Coming to an End, Singerman Sequel still Dead

Just checking in for the first time in a little while. Finally there appears to be some light at the end of the tunnel with this whole Writer's Guild strike business. According to The Hollywood Reporter and various other sources, the WGA leadership in an impromptu press conference today revealed that they are encouraged by a proposed agreement from the AMPTP and that if all goes as planned, the picket signs could be put away as early as sometime on Monday. In our opinion, its about damn time, as the thought of endless months of reality television were starting to make my skin crawl. I have a feeling the AMPTP will really be the one to have "won out" this time around.

But that's not all the good news we have for you today. Well it's not really "news" since we've been saying it for a good long while, but its always nice to see it in print nonetheless. According to yesterday's Hollywood Reporter, the strike's impending resolution has heartened studios, specialty divisions and mini-majors that a host of development projects could suddenly be jump-started. They then go on to give a few blurbs about some of the upcoming WB projects:
The consensus from industryites seemed to be that Warner Bros. had the most immediate need on both the development and spec script sides. The studio's offerings for 2009 are light, with "Watchmen," based on the graphic novel; the children's fantasy "Where the Wild Things Are"; and "Terminator Salvation: The Future Begins."

There are at least nine more projects that are not dated but could be slated for 2009, according to one source. But one studio tentpole, the sequel to "Superman Returns," is not so lucky. There apparently are no current plans to add the project to the slate, according to a studio source.
Yup, still as dead as ever. Sorry, Restart there will be no Singerman 2 in 2009, and god willing, never, ever again. Oh yeah and they do also mention the JLA film:
Meanwhile, productions with known script issues such as Warner Bros. tentpole "Justice League" are expected to get fast-tracked once writers return to the scene.
Let's all pray to whatever deity you choose that by "get fast-tracked" they mean "gets tweaked, rethought, and recast. " As bad as that last update got we sounded, WB is still more confident in it than going forward with another Singerman film. This should hopefully put to bed those silly rumors that another Singer film was only being delayed due to the strike.

311 comments:

1 – 200 of 311   Newer›   Newest»
Anonymous said...

"This should hopefully put to bed those silly rumors that another Singer film was only being delayed due to the strike."
Everytime we think the Apologists will finally shut up, they invent some new reason to live in fantasyland. If reality hasn't hit them by now, it ain't gonna anytime soon.

SUPERMAN: APOKOLIPS FAN SCRIPT!!!! said...

Guys you all NEED to check this out. Remember the guys that did that very popular Singerman was crap Talkback video on youtube last year?

Well one of them wrote a script for a new Superman REBOOT movie called SUPERMAN: APOKOLIPS.

You can get it for free on their website www.talkbackworld.net

Once inside it is the tab on the top right.

Here is a video on youtube of the guy talking about the script.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=qm-0oAR_jGQ

No we just got to get as many people to know about this thing as possible.

Anonymous said...

Singer is STILL a fag, & Superman Returns was gay & now dead.

Anonymous said...

The last time I checked this morning, the fate of Singerman still didn't seem to have been reported on at the Homopage. Gee, I wonder why that is? Let me guess, Singer and Routh are still guaranteed for 2010 now and the script is on the way. As a matter of fact, last year one of their members claimed the script was in its' second re-write. Talk about delusional!

Anonymous said...

I love that, don't you? The director has bitten off more than he can chew with another moneypit project, the majority of the cast make no secret about having moved on, the script writers were shit-canned with extreme prejudice and report after report all say "NOTHING IS HAPPENING".

Oh wait, I forgot, Variety is just a "tabloid".

The Apologists and Denialists (aided and abetted by the usual websites) are all convinced that Singerman was a huge success and a sequel is just 'round the corner.

It'd be sad if it wasn't so pathetic.

ApologistPuncher said...

Notice the lack of Apologist "activity" 'round these parts? Even that homo swright has abandoned his PATHETIC "agenda" here. When you lose a war, you DON'T hang around the place of your defeat, do you?

Steve Eunich will go on pimping out the Superman name & symbol no matter WHAT direction WB takes. His Apologist scum-suckers will agree with ANYTHING he and "the Felcher" Bailey TELL them to agree with. Their lack of independent thought is a wonder to behold, isn't it?

"If I go homo then will you still
Call me Singerman??
If I'm not alive and well, will you be there holding my junk?
I'll keep you by my side with
My super-lifting might!
Kryptonite!

You called me lame, you called me weak
But your secrets I will PEEP!
You took for granted all the times I never was around
You stumbled in and I gave Bryan Singer head, if
Not for him then my sequel wouldn't be DEAD.
I lifted up, with my back STUPID ASS solid ground

If I go homo then will you still
Call me Singerman?
If I'm not alive and well will you be
There holding my junk?
I'll keep you by my side with my
Super-lifting might!
Kryptonite!"

swright said...

I haven't left. I post over at Emi's blog because I would rather talk about JLA than MOS. That and the discussion is much more intelligent over at Emi's blog. This blog's comment section has just become a venue for you to spew your insults at everyone. It's no coincidence that ever since Emi's blog came around this blog has fallen off a bit. Plus, this site hasn't been updated until yesterday, so there was no reason to chime in.

I don't know what you think my agenda is AP. I've been pretty vocal that I no longer think MOS is going to happen. I want a JLA film with Welling in the lead, that is no secret.

I never run and hide from you AP, as there is no reason to. When you say something that I want to argue about I will always chime in.

Anonymous said...

This can't be true, Steve Eunich told me that MOS starts shooting in March '08.

I mean, afterall, he'd know

Anonymous said...

"It's no coincidence that ever since Emi's blog came around this blog has fallen off a bit."

Of course it would have nothing to do with the fact that the prospect of more Singerman looks "deader and deader" and Routh has literaly faded into well deserved obscurity, would it?

BTW, when will your Master decide to inform you and the rest of the sheep about the news from the Hollywood Reporter?

What's wrong, too credible a source? Eunich already greenlit MOS ages ago.

ApologistPuncher said...

"I never run and hide from you AP, as there is no reason to. When you say something that I want to argue about I will always chime in."

Bullshit, you Jersey queer. You run EVERY TIME we get into it, and don't even try to deny it.

And your "agenda" is to "defend" your Master and the HomoPage, as well as to WHINE to other sites about how much it "hurts" that people rip that little DICK to shreds. And you do a PISS POOR JOB of it too, sissy.

Oh, and as for THIS:

"That and the discussion is much more intelligent over at Emi's blog."

This is true, for the most part. Apologists AREN'T welcome there either, and people have echoed OUR statements about Steve Eunich as well.

I hope you or Eunich show up to the San Diego Comic-Con one day soon. I wouldn't be caught DEAD at one of those, but if I knew YOU GUYS were going to be there, I'd have a HUGE "Hello, My Name Is ApologistPuncher" sticker right on my chest. I'd take pictures of these sissy's running for security, and of the wet-spot Eunich leaves behind, for you ALL to see.

Anonymous said...

Eunuch!. The correct spelling is Eunuch.

I posted the below in the previous thread, but it's a post that relates to merchandise based Superman fan sites policies re: the MOS non-existent sequel, and Apologists in general. I felt it bears repeating.

"Aside from all the name calling and back and forth attacks between supporters and haters of Returns, I think what separates a TRUE fan of a particular genre or icon is the willingness to call crap, CRAP.

Dedicated fans of the Incredible Hulk were quick to call the 2003 film crap, Spider Man fans likewise rightly labeled Spider Man 3 the dismal disappointment that it was.

(Regarding the Hulk, I personally have high hopes for the Norton reboot.)

Ahh but Superman Returns. Here is where the true fan is separated from the merchandising whores and tasteless fools.

Eunuch and his ilk aren't going to honestly label the film for the crap that it is for obvious, self serving reasons.

Superman fans KNOW it was a piece of over budgeted garbage 30 years behind the times in content, garnished with up to date special effects. It was crap.

The thing is, the merchandising whores aren't sure WHAT Warner is going to do. They think IF Warner does indeed follow through at some future point in time with a Singer sequel, they'll have egg on their faces for slamming Returns. They rather play it safe.
No integrity. No balls.

In spite of all the flaming that goes on here (and I wish it didn't), at least the movie is labeled for what it was, plain and simple.

Crap."

Anonymous said...

P.S.

I also acknowledge that despite Spidey 3's disappointment as a movie, it still earned impressive box office returns. Box office receipts isn't what I was focusing on.

It was the fact that fans were perfectly willing to come out of the theater and say "Gee, that wasn't as good as Spider Man 2, it was a let down."

Apologists won't admit Returns was crap.

Superman fans will.

Anonymous said...

D-E-N-I-A-L!!!!!

Anonymous said...

"...the discussion is much more intelligent over at Emi's blog" swrighty

Yeah, there's plenty of people over there now telling you how much of a FUCKHEAD Steve Younis is.

You don't have to be exclusively here to have that opinion. Anyone with half a fuckin brain knows what a cockhead Younis is

swright said...

"Yeah, there's plenty of people over there now telling you how much of a FUCKHEAD Steve Younis is."

Plenty of people? It's the same people from here.

"Of course it would have nothing to do with the fact that the prospect of more Singerman looks "deader and deader" and Routh has literaly faded into well deserved obscurity, would it?"

Of course it does, I'm not saying that. JLA is a hotter topic right now because that's the franchise they've chosen to continue.

"I'd have a HUGE "Hello, My Name Is ApologistPuncher" sticker right on my chest."

Trust me, I wouldn't run. I don't run away from fights and if that's what would happen, so be it. But, no, I'm not going to the one in San Diego, but I will probably go to the Wizard World convention in Philly this year. Hope to see you there.

ApologistPuncher said...

"Trust me, I wouldn't run. I don't run away from fights and if that's what would happen, so be it. But, no, I'm not going to the one in San Diego, but I will probably go to the Wizard World convention in Philly this year. Hope to see you there."

Nah, you probably just stand there and catch an ass-whopin'. But like YOU said, pretty "brave" to say so ON THE INTERNETS, anus-jockey.

"Plenty of people? It's the same people from here."

Take a look AGAIN, shithead. EVERYBODY who posts there has NOTHING but "bad" things to say about your Master and his HomoPage.

Gonna WHINE and CRY over there about your "feelings" AGAIN, you little bitch??

ApologistPuncher said...

"Guys you all NEED to check this out. Remember the guys that did that very popular Singerman was crap Talkback video on youtube last year?

Well one of them wrote a script for a new Superman REBOOT movie called SUPERMAN: APOKOLIPS."

Haven't read it, probably won't, but I did get the "synopsis" and I can say: Thanks, but no thanks.

You CAN'T start off a new Superman film series with a villain like Darkseid. He is too big and sci-fi to catch on with the General Audience right off the bat. They need to start off with a "low key" villain, but one that CAN be sci-fi based, and HINT at somebody like Darkseid for a sequel.

Metallo WOULD be a good start, making him Lex's "experiment" is even BETTER. No origin necessary, nobody knowing Lex for the villain he is, heck Superman not even knowing where he is from would be good too. ALL of these things can be addressed in further films, used to DEVELOP the characters and making it 1,000,000X more EPIC than BS could ever DREAM of.

I'm sure your script is good, and I might read it one day down the line. But ANY film script that uses Granny Goodness as a character needs some "tweaking".

Anonymous said...

"This should hopefully put to bed those silly rumors that another Singer film was only being delayed due to the strike."
"Everytime we think the Apologists will finally shut up, they invent some new reason to live in fantasyland. If reality hasn't hit them by now, it ain't gonna anytime soon."

You're absolutely right! A visit to the apologists' lair revealed that the fate of Singerman has STILL NOT BEEN REPORTED ON AT ALL! Not in their news OR their forums. And even worse, they still seem to be talking about the Man of Steel and, of course, slighting JLA. When will it ever end?!

swright said...

"Nah, you probably just stand there and catch an ass-whopin'."

From you? Hardly.

ApologistPuncher said...

"From you? Hardly."

Uh-oh, MORE "tough talk" from the anal douche swright!! Big, bad, HomoPage "fluffer" swright!

Hey, little bitch, isn't it half-past your Master's blowjob appointment? Will he use BOTH fists now?

swright's gonna be a little "crankey" for the nest few days fella's. His wiw-bottom's gonna be a wiw SORE.....

swright said...

LOL...It's not tough talk AP. You just don't mean anything to me, other than a funny distraction. Honestly, you and I are never going to meet. You aren't going to come to New Jersey and I'm not flying to San Diego. So, what is there to proove?

Oh, I guess I could "talk tough" as you say, but, it doesn't mean anything. I get the need for you to feel superior. Really, I do.

ApologistPuncher said...

"I get the need for you to feel superior. Really, I do."

Actually, by YOU coming HERE, it shows YOUR need to feel "inferior". Do you see me going to the HomoPage trying to "defend" the shit you talk about this Blog? Allow me to answer: No, no you don't. So keep your ignorant arm-chair psychology BULLSHIT inside your morbidly-obese head, ok loser?

"You aren't going to come to New Jersey and I'm not flying to San Diego."

Who in their RIGHT MIND would leave Southern California to go to New Jersey? Anyone? It's been about 80 degrees and sunny HERE, what's it like in the toxic waste dump YOU call home, queen?

Anonymous said...

I've been to New Jersey, the whole state smells like hot dog water

ApologistPuncher said...

Imagine what it smells like in swright's mom's basement...

Anonymous said...

Singer is a FAG and Superman Returns was gay.

Singermanwasadisasterzone said...

Apologistpuncher, I really advise you to read that fan script. You will be quite surprised. There has been some feedback on their site about thoughts from fans and virtually no one has given it less than a 9. It is about far more than just a duel with darkseid and it definitely starts of with a good character build for everyone with hints at what has happened to the key characters.

I think knocking a script just because you think the bad guy is too big AND granny goodness is in it (she is used sparingly in the story and is in her Athena form and NEVER called granny goodness).

It is such a radically different take on a Superman movie that people not even reading it makes no sense when they bash singerman (VERY rightly so) for being boring, been there done that and angsty.

Superman Apokolips is a fan's Superman movie.

ApologistPuncher said...

"I think knocking a script just because you think the bad guy is too big AND granny goodness is in it"

If you want to take my comments as a "knock", you are MORE than entitled to. But it doesn't change the VALIDITY of what I said.

You have to look at it from a FINANCIAL standpoint, not just what YOU want to see. Guess who made a film for THEM, not US? Exactly. Your script may be OUTSTANDING, but it doesn't change the fact that it is "too much, too soon". You have to hook the GA FIRST, and having a villain like Darkseid right off the bat won't do that. Most of them have NO idea who Darkseid is, and the HEAVY sci-fi elements will pull them right out of the movie.

Look at the JLA "script leaks". It is based on lower-key villains and storylines. OMAC's, Maxwell Lord and Talia Al Ghul. No Darkseid, no Doomsday, no Despero, no Starro The Conquerer. The OMAC's give the JLA a "physical" villain to fight, Lord/Mind-controlled Superman the "internal struggle", and Al Ghul the "emotional" hardship. IF JLA gets made, the sequels can then focus on a BIGGER threat because the people KNOW what they are all about. The same HAS to apply to Superman.

Just try to grasp what I am saying, and don't think I'm putting down your efforts. Try writing a "first" movie, giving Superman a bad guy that is more "believable", but throw in HINTS of Darkseid being out there. People CAN buy a man who is mortally wounded being turned into a kryptonite-fueled cyborg. Why? Because we've pretty much seen it before. Get them to CARE about your Superman, THEN hit them with a bad-ass, city destroying battle with a character like Darkseid. In a sequel. That's one of the BIG issues with Singerman Peeps. Who gave a shit what happened to that perverted sissy?

And tell you what: I'm going to read your script and give it an HONEST review. If I think it would work as the first film of a reboot, I'll have NO qualms about saying I was WRONG.

Anonymous said...

The french man is back and smack you dumb americans down with this logic. If WB has no comic book tent pole set up like superman then the company with drop like a rock. And the fastest way to get a movie in the can is.......

To bring Singer back!

Restart

YOu know its the only way.

Anonymous said...

Excuse my ignorance, but who the fuck is Granny Goodness?? Sounds like someone out of a Richie Rich comic.

Oh, and Retard's back......yawn

Anonymous said...

If anything is an example of reintroducing a franchise to a mainstream audience, Transformers pulled it off with ease.

...and Retard, I'm sure Bryan Singer will drop everything and get cracking so Warners have a tent pole in 2009.

Fuck you're a stupid cunt

Father Finian Egan

colors said...

"Excuse my ignorance, but who the fuck is Granny Goodness"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Granny_Goodness

Anonymous said...

Jeez, I go on about Retard and I didn't think of Wikipedia

d'oh

Thanks el

Anonymous said...

"Granny Goodness appeares on the Superman: The Animated Series episode "Little Girl Lost," where she was voiced by Edward Asner." wikipedia

Sounds like quite a lady.

I'm sure that's how those gay Singer fans must like their women, "voiced by Edward Asner"

Singermanwasadisasterzone said...

Apologistuncher, while what you're saying makes sense, you too are not grasping what my argument is. You are thinking of this fan script as a contender for the next Superman movie.

It was not written for that. It was written for fans of the character to imagine a movie that probably will never be made but is fun nonetheless.

However, I do NOT agree with the idea of gentle introductions. In this day and age, such a thing is pointless and you would kill of Superman completely by doing another half assed film relying on lex and krytonite manipulation in whatever shape or form. To even stand a chance of success, Superman has to hit with something NO ONE has ever thought of or expected ie a Darkseid story with elements of the New Gods etc. Something of that ilk.

Your mentality is similar to what a studio exec would think and is based firmly on basic business/sales models. That is fair enough, but true hits are the movies that have taken risks in the past. Movies that before release people would have thought they had no chance of success. I mean gee, Cloverfield was a handheld cam feature with not a single star and no real story. It was new and original and it worked. Superman is known, we already had a bad Singerman experience, so why go again with some 50/50 hedge your bets movie when such a film that was SUPER safe as singer's just flopped out of the park? I say do whatever is the most adventurous. Superman deserves it.

We can agree to disagree on this point. You have your reasons for your opinions and I have mine.

colors said...

Singerman failed for myriad reasons. A "gentle introduction" could've been tolerated if the film had delivered the goods in other areas.

It didn't.

AP's idea about starting off with, say, Superman vs. Lex and Metallo or some such is not without merit. For one thing, as he said, it's a gentler introduction. For two things, it leaves the inevitable sequel somewhere to go.

Darkseid is a hell of a villain and he ain't easy to top. Starting off with him doesn't leave much for sequels that Superman hasn't already overcome in the first outing.

ApologistPuncher said...

"AP's idea about starting off with, say, Superman vs. Lex and Metallo or some such is not without merit. For one thing, as he said, it's a gentler introduction. For two things, it leaves the inevitable sequel somewhere to go."

Unfortunately, I believe the writer has taken what I am saying as "criticism" of his work, and reacted "defensively" instead of "listening".

I've read the first 40 pages or so, and I can say without a doubt that this is NOT the way to go for a reboot. To start off with such DRASTIC changes would confuse people, as they have NO "connection" to THIS Superman. This script IS a sequel, but NOT a "first" movie.

Starting off with Lex Luthor as a "background" villain, NEVER confronting Superman or taking "center stage" is a better beginning. Having him discover kryptonite's effects on Superman, leading to the creation of the PRIMARY villain adds to his character. Metallo gives Superman someone to FIGHT, which puts it 10 steps ahead of BS and Singerman. Superman NOT knowing where he comes from can lead into YOUR script, where he learns what he is FROM Darkseid, which gives it EMOTIONAL WEIGHT.

First show us YOUR Lois, YOUR Jimmy, and most importantly, YOUR Superman. Let us get to know him, what "makes him tick" and NOT jump in with both feet forward.

A first film DOESN'T have to be Singerman dull. But it DOES have to have character development. Find a "balance", then in a sequel go balls-to-the-Apologist-mouth with the action right off the bat.

"Superman is known, we already had a bad Singerman experience, so why go again with some 50/50 hedge your bets movie when such a film that was SUPER safe as singer's just flopped out of the park?"

Nice attempt at "flipping" my argument to fit you. Unfortunately, it doesn't work.

Anonymous said...

If WB has no comic book tent pole set up like superman then the company with drop like a rock.

yeah sort of like this past summer, right? Numb nuts

ApologistPuncher said...

"I'm sure that's how those gay Singer fans must like their women, "voiced by Edward Asner""

For that idiot Terminal, it's: Voiced by Edward Asner, portrayed by Richard Simmons.

Anonymous said...

Hey AP, I glanced at their news section comments yesterday & where Common was being discussed as Green Lantern, Terminal seemed to brag on Common's acting ability as well as his BUILD. I haven't copied & pasted the exact quote as I don't currently have any windows open for that. I was also in somewhat of a hurry & didn't have time to really research it, but yeah, that comment DID stand out. Keep in mind this was by the same Terminal who despises ICKY GIRLS running around Smallville in scantily-clad clothing. Yeah, guys who despise sexy women & brag on other guys 'builds' are without a doubt, FAGGOTS. Bodybuilders might brag on builds but at least some of them still like females.

ApologistPuncher said...

If it was Common or Tyrese that came out in that pink bikini, Terminal "The Douche" would have been RAVING about that episode. But because it was breasts and a vagina packing that sexy outfit, he "Hated it!".

I think he is confused about something though. When he sees the initials "MOS", he thinks it's a new gay porn release: Milk Our Schlongs.

So of course, he's ALL for it.....

Anonymous said...

Terminal's a dyed in the wool fag. No use pretending he's not.

He was recently crying about the scantily clad "Black Canary" being used to pull in viewers.

What gays like Terminal and Neal Fagley overlook is that those DC characters wear even more revealing outfits in the fuckin comics.

Father Finian Egan

Anonymous said...

"He was recently crying about the scantily clad "Black Canary" being used to pull in viewers."
You're kidding! Paste it here!

Anonymous said...

I kid Terminal.

ApologistPuncher said...

"I kid Terminal."

I don't.

There isn't much that is more PATHETIC than an overweight teenager ashamed of his sexuality, who harbors an OBSESSION with the black cock. Anyone placing bets on him RAVING over "Hancock" with Will Smith?

Shit, the TITLE ALONE got HIS vote....

ApologistPuncher said...

Got a question for you guys:

What's the diference between an Apologist and a freezer?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Freezers don't fart when you pull the meat out...

Anonymous said...

Here's some quotes from Terminal pertaining to Common:

"He has a deep voice, he's built, and dangit, I think he can do this role if it's written well."

"Oh yes. He's the right age, and perfect build. I can see myself excited for him."

I can see it too. You honor, guilty as charged!

ApologistPuncher said...

"I can see myself excited for him."

What they didn't know was, he was looking at his OWN crotch when he typed this....

Anonymous said...

Terminal, tu' puedes chupas la leche de mi gran matraca, tu' pato chupando! Maricon! Terminal es Boricua!

Anonymous said...

"I mean, we get it, she's hot and blond, why do they take every female character and find the simplest reason to feature them in a skimpy outfit? It's horrible."

Terminal re Supergirl in Smallville

November 07

Anonymous said...

"I know what Supergirl looks like in the comics, and I'm not a fan of that either"

Terminal

from same discussion

Anonymous said...

"My comment was a reference for Smallville's propensity for featuring unnecessary near nudity for the sake of baiting the male audience"

Terminal, again demonstrating that good looking women are not his cup of tea

Anonymous said...

"There's no need to take a character down to the level of raw animism just for the sake of ratings in what is supposed to be a valuable drama."

Neal Fagley rushing to Terminal's defense

Those gays sure stick together

Anonymous said...

"A hot scene between Green Arrow and Lois turns into a threesome even a superhero would have a hard time with." TV Guide

"Lure the fanboys in with double entendres and ensure ratings. Classy." Terminal

re "Siren"

Anonymous said...

"...murder, clones, evil twins, it's all soap opera fodder. But if that appeals to anyone beyond women then great. I'm sincere in that sentiment."

Terminal demonstrating that misogeny is alive and well on the Homopage.

Younis has rocks in his stupid fuckin head. It's hilarious to see how Terminal and Neal Fagley are allowed to drive people away from his site. That's great business sense Steve.

Check out the latest postings re Smallville. There's about three people involved these days

ApologistPuncher said...

Yes, Terminal is INDEED a "schlong surfer".

If the JLA episode was 5 black guys wearing speedos and high-heels, he'd have NOTHING but praise for the show. Since those "pesky breeders" keep popping up in their revealing outfits, he CAN'T sustain his "shame stick" throughout the episodes. So it causes a bit of hard feelings for him.

"Shame stick?" you may be asking. It's what his mommy calls it every time he gets "engorged" while watching "The Naked Bros. Band".

Anonymous said...

Check out the latest from Terminal:

"Neal's butt smells like freshly cut grass.

That's because he... sprinkles freshly cut grass on his butt daily, but that's another topic for another time."

This is NOT a joke. What a fag!

Anonymous said...

Terminal may as well not deny it any longer. Hey Term, wannasuckadick?

Sepharih said...

You have got to be kidding me. According to IGN.com, Warner Bros. has decided to cut Batman and Superman from the Justice League film.

http://movies.ign.com/articles/852/852171p1.html

...unbelievable. Warner Bros. really is run by a bunch of fucking idiots. Sure, most of the characters in the JLA are solo film worthy, and you could write a workable screenplay that didn’t have Batman or Superman in it...but this is almost like doing an X-men film without Wolverine. You could do it...but what kind of idiot would?
Superman and Batman are both easily the biggest draws this movie would have had.

You know what...for once the apologists were right about something, even if it was for the wrong reasons. WB, just cancel this project.

Anonymous said...

"That's because he... sprinkles freshly cut grass on his butt daily, but that's another topic for another time."

This is NOT a joke. What a fag!"

Fuck, you're right

I suppose with all the evidence about Terminal he had no choice but to come out of the closet

Anonymous said...

"Superman and Batman are both easily the biggest draws this movie would have had."

I wouldn't get too concerned just yet. That story cites Moviehole as the source. Another shill site that backed Singer

More of the viral "Bring Back Singer" campaign going on

colors said...

Terminal- Neal's butt smells like freshly cut grass. That's because he... sprinkles freshly cut grass on his butt daily, but that's another topic for another time
Oooooookay!

Warner Bros. has decided to cut Batman and Superman from the Justice League film
Honestly, I find this hard to believe. This came out on Wednesday. The day the WGA went back to work. You mean to tell me that a writer could somehow go through an entire script, remove two pivotal characters, cook up an entirely new storyline, write up a draft of it and turn it in all in one day?

Yeah right.

If Batman and Superman have been written out of the movie though, it's time to cancel it. Period, end of story. JLA without Batman and Superman is not the JLA.

ApologistPuncher said...

This ALL started with ONE website, and ONE website ONLY.

Moviehole has been trying to "drum up" bad press for the JLA film from the BEGINNING. Why, you may ask? Because BS can see what shape his "career" is in, and he NEEDS to do a Singerman sequel if he wants to continue with his drug habit and "lifestyle". The writing is on the wall as far as what Valkyrie is going to do to him, and he can't do his queer flick now, thanks to Sean Penn. So he's calling-in "favors" he is owed by his shill-flunkies, i.e. IESB, Singerman HomoPage, Latino Review and yes, Moviehole. Guess what? They are ALL prepared to toss his salad at a moment's notice. Will it help get BS the job? What do YOU think?

Unless you guys don't get it, "Clint", like Younis, is an Aussie with ZERO pride. All he wants is to carve out a PATHETIC little "niche", INTEGRITY be DAMNED.

ApologistPuncher said...

"That's because he... sprinkles freshly cut grass on his butt daily, but that's another topic for another time."

It's pretty obvious that Terminal is an exhibitionist. Him "outing" one of the Apologist sex-games he plays with Neal "The Felcher" Bailey is PROOF of this.

Hey, Neal, do you like it when Terminal gets "rough" when you play "Gopher Go HOME!"??

The Singerman HOMOPAGE indeed....

Anonymous said...

http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-work15feb15,0,2204372.story?page=2

Hey AP - the last paragraph will make your fucking day - NOT!

"Fox is looking for screenplay help for its romantic comedy "Bride Wars," and Dimension Films hopes to move forward on "The $6 Billion Man," a loose remake of the TV series, possibly with Eddie Murphy. Warner Bros. is looking to hire writers for "Superman 2" and Paramount is developing a Billy Crystal comedy."


"Superman 2" as in the next instalment. As in sequel. As in MOS.

I am so gonna laugh in your arrogant punk face if MOS gets made - especially if Singer's still on board. You'll be laughed off every blog you've posted your filth on.

colors said...

Since you're posting the same bullshit on two different blog comments, here's my response from the emijayne blog.

"They might've heard "another Superman movie" and made the leap to Singerman sequel. This came up in the business section of the paper, not the entertainment section.

Even *IF* they meant a Singer sequel, that would make this article an island of hope in a sea of certitude that a sequel ain't ever gonna happen. It's hardly something we Realists need to worry ourselves with."

ApologistPuncher said...

""Superman 2" as in the next instalment. As in sequel. As in MOS.

I am so gonna laugh in your arrogant punk face if MOS gets made - especially if Singer's still on board. You'll be laughed off every blog you've posted your filth on."

I GUARANTEE everybody on here, that THIS shit-sucking asshole will NOT show his queer face AGAIN when he is inevitably proven WRONG.

By the way swright, how's Younis' nutsack taste these day? Little "funky" from dragging on the bathroom tile while felching BS?

For those NOT stupid, remember that this was the SAME line being "rumored" once the Wonder Twins were FIRED. In ALL that time, have they hired any writers? Don;t forget, that happened LONG before the strike.

Anonymous said...

"I GUARANTEE everybody on here, that THIS shit-sucking asshole will NOT show his queer face AGAIN when he is inevitably proven WRONG.

By the way swright, how's Younis' nutsack taste these day? Little "funky" from dragging on the bathroom tile while felching BS?

For those NOT stupid, remember that this was the SAME line being "rumored" once the Wonder Twins were FIRED. In ALL that time, have they hired any writers? Don;t forget, that happened LONG before the strike."


Hey fuckface - a couple of points:
a) I'm not swright.
b) We'll see whose laughing soon. I only hope MOS is released with Singer at the helm so as to shut your 17 year old pimply pre-pubescent face up.

It is so fucking boring reading you 'supposedly' showing those 'apologist fucks' who's 'boss'.

You are an imbicile, with nothing better to do with your worthless life than to try and act like a hard-man for anyone that cares to pay attention to your moronic, foul, high-school ramblings.

Get a grip. Get a life. And grow up.

Oh and El-bento, you can twist the article however you like. It's easier to do that than acknowledge that, you know, the reporter may actually have some knowledge that contradicts your view. Dickhead.

ApologistPuncher said...

"Hey fuckface - a couple of points:
a) I'm not swright.
b) We'll see whose laughing soon. I only hope MOS is released with Singer at the helm so as to shut your 17 year old pimply pre-pubescent face up.

It is so fucking boring reading you 'supposedly' showing those 'apologist fucks' who's 'boss'.

You are an imbicile, with nothing better to do with your worthless life than to try and act like a hard-man for anyone that cares to pay attention to your moronic, foul, high-school ramblings.

Get a grip. Get a life. And grow up.

Oh and El-bento, you can twist the article however you like. It's easier to do that than acknowledge that, you know, the reporter may actually have some knowledge that contradicts your view. Dickhead."

A couple of points from someone who is NOT a faggot:

1. You ARE indeed swright, queer.

2. Now this Apologist jizz-wrangler "HOPES" they make Madame Of Swish?? Notice after MY post this queen is NO LONGER ADAMANT?

And now onto the "17 year old" comment: Any doubt that Apologists share MORE in common with BS than just Singerman Peeps? Pedophiles are SICK and DISGUSTING assholes. I can't WAIT to read about YOU getting busted by "Perverted Justice", you fucking human trash.

Oh, and notice how swright said it is SO "boring" reading about me kicking the SHIT out of his asshole brethren ALL THE TIME? Read between the lines. This queer has a HUGE crush on me, and CANNOT stop coming HERE so he feels a "connection" with the object of his "lust".

With all these "unspoken" feelings floating around, it must be getting crowded in that CLOSET.

Anonymous said...

"Hey fuckface - a couple of points:
a) I'm not swright.
b) We'll see whose laughing soon. I only hope MOS is released with Singer at the helm so as to shut your 17 year old pimply pre-pubescent face up."

Would you happen to be Solaris then? There's a similiar posting about 'Superman 2 from the LA Times' over on the news section comments at the Younis site, sans the profanity & personal attacks on AP, but it's funny it was posted in about the same 24-hr. time-frame. It was as usual for MOS. I think Solaris may be a girl.

Anonymous said...

Oh, and they knew colors was el-trento, but as per the usual apologist they can't spell.

Anonymous said...

"A couple of points from someone who is NOT a faggot:"

So who posted this instead of you, shit-sticker. All the anti-queer stuff you spout would give psychologists a field day with your confused sexuality.

"1. You ARE indeed swright, queer."

I know who I am. You don't.

"And now onto the "17 year old" comment: Any doubt that Apologists share MORE in common with BS than just Singerman Peeps? Pedophiles are SICK and DISGUSTING assholes. I can't WAIT to read about YOU getting busted by "Perverted Justice", you fucking human trash."

Only a sick, sexually insecure deviant would turn a non-sexual comment about someone's age into a sexual context. I think we can safely establish who's fucked in the head sexually here, eh AP? Gay and into kids huh? You sick paedo bastard.

"Oh, and notice how swright said it is SO "boring" reading about me kicking the SHIT out of his asshole brethren ALL THE TIME? Read between the lines. This queer has a HUGE crush on me, and CANNOT stop coming HERE so he feels a "connection" with the object of his "lust". "

More delusions of importance and granduer. I've yet to see you hand anything to anyone. All you do is spew foul comments everywhere making yourself look like a a high-school pimply dork.

You know AP, people come here just to see you make an ass of yourself, do you know that?

So... let me guess what's coming next... Oh yeah, rather than address his inconsistancies and sexual deviances, he'll carry on with the insults

Anonymous said...

"Oh, and they knew colors was el-trento, but as per the usual apologist they can't spell."

El-'bent'o was a play on words... Fuck me, don't tell me your reading's that bad you didn't get it.

At least 'apologists' have some modicum of intelligence...

ApologistPuncher said...

"So who posted this instead of you, shit-sticker. All the anti-queer stuff you spout would give psychologists a field day with your confused sexuality."

Notice Mr. Confused Sexuality ONCE AGAIN copied my last insult to him? I bet he thought he was being "clever", but is too STUPID to realize he's just plagiarizing me.

"I know who I am. You don't."

Oh, I KNOW who YOU are. Bank on that, homo.

"Only a sick, sexually insecure deviant would turn a non-sexual comment about someone's age into a sexual context. I think we can safely establish who's fucked in the head sexually here, eh AP? Gay and into kids huh? You sick paedo bastard."

Plagiarized again. Anyone remember in grade school, the LOSER kid who could ONLY come-back at you with: "I know YOU are, but what am I??" Sometimes they DON'T grow out of it.

"More delusions of importance and granduer. I've yet to see you hand anything to anyone. All you do is spew foul comments everywhere making yourself look like a a high-school pimply dork.

You know AP, people come here just to see you make an ass of yourself, do you know that?

So... let me guess what's coming next... Oh yeah, rather than address his inconsistancies and sexual deviances, he'll carry on with the insults."

Oh. My. God. I can't believe I didn't think of it that way... People LAUGH at what I say??? Thank you, you cock-addicted piece of shit! I've seen "the light".

You really ARE pathetic, you smelly fuck.

I LOVE how fucked in the head these Apologist clowns from the HomoPage are. They come here saying: "You ain't so tough! I know I can kick your ass because you talk tough on the internets! I'm a bad ass because I DON'T talk tough on the internets!", and somehow in their twisted melon's think they "beat" ME.

The only thing these nut-juggler's "beat" is each other's MEAT at the HomoPage. Each and every one of them have left here with pains in their ass when they "tangled" with yours truly.

And not the "good kind" that they get from OTHER Apologists.

ApologistPuncher said...

"At least 'apologists' have some modicum of intelligence..."

THIS, coming from an Apologist...

Don't forget, REtard's think they are "normal" too....

Anonymous said...

You see, you really think that's clever and witty don't you?

Once again, you skip the accusations and go straight to insult-mode. At no point did I plagiarise anyone.

By your definition, anyone that throws an insult your way is copying you. Guess what. Who cares what you think. No one.

The only people that care what you have to say can barely string sentences together anyway.

As for 'tangling with yours truly'... you really are an arrogant cocksucker aren't you?

There's nothing to tangle with except a pimply-faced name-calling playground bully, who still thinks it's smart and clever to insult people for the hell of it.

Carry on dude. Like I say. No one cares. No one that matters anyway.

Oh and AP. You don't talk tough. You talk shit. You like to try and talk over people. You think that's the same as winning an argument.

Newsflash. No one can be bothered with arguing with you because it's futile. It's like pissing up a wall. Satisying for a moment, but ultimately just a flash in an otherwise fulfilling life.

At the end of the day, you're still here. Still the wall being pissed on.

I'm outta here. For now. I'll be back to educate you some more later AP. When I need another piss.

ApologistPuncher said...

"modicum"

You were saying?

To be fair, this WAS a typo by His Queerness. He WANTED to say "mucho cum", but realized he'd ONCE AGAIN be "outing" himself.

ApologistPuncher said...

"You see, you really think that's clever and witty don't you?

Once again, you skip the accusations and go straight to insult-mode. At no point did I plagiarise anyone.

By your definition, anyone that throws an insult your way is copying you. Guess what. Who cares what you think. No one.

The only people that care what you have to say can barely string sentences together anyway.

As for 'tangling with yours truly'... you really are an arrogant cocksucker aren't you?

There's nothing to tangle with except a pimply-faced name-calling playground bully, who still thinks it's smart and clever to insult people for the hell of it.

Carry on dude. Like I say. No one cares. No one that matters anyway.

Oh and AP. You don't talk tough. You talk shit. You like to try and talk over people. You think that's the same as winning an argument.

Newsflash. No one can be bothered with arguing with you because it's futile. It's like pissing up a wall. Satisying for a moment, but ultimately just a flash in an otherwise fulfilling life.

At the end of the day, you're still here. Still the wall being pissed on.

I'm outta here. For now. I'll be back to educate you some more later AP. When I need another piss."

Quite a "hissy fit", "Felcher". Did I hurt little one's "feewings"? Good. Too bad your dad didn't stick that coat hanger ALL THE WAY inside your fucking head when he tried aborting your stupid ass.

Somebody has a fascination with Golden Showers TOO, I see. I can just see the HomoPage's monthly gang-bang now. Bodily fluids EVERYWHERE.

Oh, and it's pretty funny that he NEVER plagiarized me, but tried using MY insults against ME. Repeatedly. Just like Singerman Peeps, you're 100% "original", right fucknuts?

"No one cares. No one that matters anyway."

Feel free to count how many posts of mine you responded to, 'mo. Then think about just WHO "nobody" is.....

Anonymous said...

Whoo hoo. Terminal is outed here then as if by magic up turns a defender of Steve Eunich's sheep.

Hi Steve Eunich

colors said...

Oh and El-bento
Wow. You really got me there. That is, if you were even referring to me, which your idiotic retort doesn't make clear.

It's easier to do that than acknowledge that, you know, the reporter may actually have some knowledge that contradicts your view. Dickhead.
What knowledge?! This is literally the first article in MONTHS that hints at a Singer sequel. And even THAT is ambiguous at best! The person writing the article was in the business section, not the entertainment one. He wouldn't necessarily fully grasp the nuances of what's gone on (or, in Singer's case, what HASN'T gone on) with the franchise. I mean, maybe, MAYBE, I would take the article a bit more seriously if it had been in Variety or something a bit more solid.

Oh, and they knew colors was el-trento, but as per the usual apologist they can't spell.
Or make a coherent insult out of it. "Bento"? Wow, if that's the best they've got...

But either way, he's definitely a Younis cronie. Nothing to get offended over. No my friend, just pity him.

El-'bent'o was a play on words
No. It wasn't. A play on words would've made both your subject (me, in this case) and your intent (I have no idea what you were shooting for here, forgive me) clear while also cutting me down.

None of those things were accomplished; all you managed to do was reveal what a moron you are by rearranging a few letters of the alphabet. I might've been impressed if second graders didn't already have a corner on that market. So no, you're not a word player, you've only revealed that you're a fucking moron.

As if that wasn't already clear from your back and forth with the Apologist Puncher.

Hmm. Failure. As a Swooperman fan, that's undoubtedly a state of being with which I'm sure you're only too familiar.

swright said...

AP, the person you are arguing with is NOT me.

Anonymous said...

From the LA Times business section; article on Hollywood post writer's strike:

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-f...196,full.story

"Fox is looking for screenplay help for its romantic comedy "Bride Wars," and Dimension Films hopes to move forward on "The $6 Billion Man," a loose remake of the TV series, possibly with Eddie Murphy. Warner Bros. is looking to hire writers for "Superman 2" and Paramount is developing a Billy Crystal comedy."

So...sumthin's going on. Maybe not much at the moment, but SR 2 ain't dead yet it seems.

You heterosexuals are in trouble now, Superman II has a chance!

Anonymous said...

I told you so! The french are right again. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA!!!!!!MOS hear it comes and JLA dawson creek is dead dead dead. I win you lose. Love to see this site, SSS, AP, and all you denialists eat my shit again. I love you stupid americans.

MOS is indeed on for 2009!

REStart

Deal with it! Thats the facts if you dont like it buy a gun and rent the bullet!!!! You going to cry now!!!! I told you so.

Anonymous said...

what no response? Does the fact that MOS is coming faster then a bullet train down your throat make you sad! Oh well take it like a man. And enjoy..............

MOS in 2009!

REstart

AP love how you think if someone posts an opposite opinion they must be Swright or me. Denialist are in the minority. Over 70% on rotten tomatoes proves my point that makes it better then spiderman 3. Face the facts your the minority. Facts hurt don't they.

Anonymous said...

"El-'bent'o was a play on words... Fuck me, don't tell me your reading's that bad you didn't get it.

At least 'apologists' have some modicum of intelligence..."

Hey, you still didn't answer the question. Are you Solaris, or not? Similiar praise postings for 'Superman 2 in the LA Times' on two different sites TOO close together sorta gives you away, kinda like Superfag95, that is, unless AP is CERTAIN that you are someone else.

Anonymous said...

Oh look, ApologistPedophile still needs pissing on... Righty-ho...

"Oh, and it's pretty funny that he NEVER plagiarized me, but tried using MY insults against ME. Repeatedly."

You obviously haven't a fucking clue what the word plagiarized means. Look it up, wankstain. It means passing off material from someone else as you own. i.e. Books, films, etc. Fucking idiot - you don't own the English language or all the expletives in it.

The best part of you ran down your mother's leg.

"No one cares. No one that matters anyway."

Feel free to count how many posts of mine you responded to, 'mo. Then think about just WHO "nobody" is.....


That mere fact I continued to piss over you does not mean I care a fucking bit about you or the diatribe you post.

And just what kind of prick addresses everybody like, "see how this 'apologist' fuck tries to [insert trash here]..." - as if they fucking care for the shit you write?

Just post like everyone else. Make your point, and then see if people actually give a fuck.

(Beyond colors who obviously has your fat ass covered in more ways than one. Speaking of which...)

Hey, El-bento. I noticed you don't post at the Homepage anymore. What happened - they get wise to what a two-faced asshole you are? All nice and friendly to the posters over there, but dissing them all over here. What a fucking loser.

Oh and for the record. I am not swright, Bailey, or Solaris. You seem to be under the impression I'm a member of the Homepage. But hey, fuck-wits listen up; it doesn't matter who I am, all that matters is that self-important high-school pricks like AP and his bitch El-bento need pissing on.

I'll be back to urinate later.

The AP Urinator said...

Hey - as of now, for the guy that wants to know who I am, and AP who's running out of Homepage members to guess at - I'm going to do what AP did; pick a fucking useless name to be known as on this wankstain of a blog.

I'm gonna call myself 'The AP Urinator."

Anonymous said...

Singer's gayness is why he loves the anus.

Anonymous said...

The AP Urinator, giving head & packing fudge, like Singerman. Oh, you do belong to the Homopage, without a doubt. Else you wouldn't be spread-eagle like you are in their defense. Realists have a mind of their own.

The AP Urinator said...

^^ Anonymous above - 'packing fudge and giving head.'

You're brainless taking it up the anus. Fucking twat.

colors said...

Hey, El-bento. I noticed you don't post at the Homepage anymore. What happened - they get wise to what a two-faced asshole you are? All nice and friendly to the posters over there, but dissing them all over here. What a fucking loser.

Dude, you're a freak.

Anonymous said...

"^^ Anonymous above - 'packing fudge and giving head.'

You're brainless taking it up the anus. Fucking twat."

Hey Urinator, look who's calling who brainless. You're 'personally unaffected' by what goes on over here & can leave at any time, yet you KEEP COMING BACK! Yeah, you posted 4 minutes after I did. 4 MINUTES! Now who's obsessed? You're SO obviously staying over here continually. I bet you leave for a few minutes to 'go home' & then maximize this window to stay up-to-date. What a moron! Now who doesn't have a life?

As to who you are, let's see who you're NOT. To be fair to some, not ALL apologists are created equal. There are apologists over there who that, while for Singerman, will AT LEAST allow a realist to voice their opinion, even though they disagree. They may even agree with certain points that the realist makes, even though over-all they're for Singerman. These posters are usually cordial & even respectful to the realist, & the discussion usually goes on to become what even THEY call INTELLIGENT DEBATE. I can give credit where credit is due in THEIR case. They don't necessarily agree, but still respect the other's opinion & therefore there's no animosity there, even on the realist's part. THEY'RE the type that one could probably even be friends with in the real world, so I have no attacks on them. However, I won't call any names there out of respect to them, but Bud, YOU'RE NOT ONE OF THEM!

Let's see who you could be. On the flip side of what I just said, there are a number of apologists that are just totally rude & obnoxious. They not only suck Singer's cock & rim him, but they attack realists verbally, even on their own site, & seemingly get away with it. This is a known fact here. As a matter of fact, Terminal is without a doubt your Poster Boy. His rudeness knows no bounds, & he's supposed to be a movie critic? Not! But he's not the only one. There's also the likes of Hynad & Jeffrey Bridges, who likewise cut people down left & right. I could probably think of some more names later, but these examples take the cake!

So, Urinator Douchebag, are you one of these? C'mon, fess up, twink.

The AP Urinator said...

"Yeah, you posted 4 minutes after I did. 4 MINUTES! Now who's obsessed? You're SO obviously staying over here continually. I bet you leave for a few minutes to 'go home' & then maximize this window to stay up-to-date. What a moron! Now who doesn't have a life?"

I was checking to see if AP had replied. Coincidental timing is all asswipe.

"There are apologists over there who that, while for Singerman, will AT LEAST allow a realist to voice their opinion, even though they disagree."

Look fuckstain, you spam every fucking thread with the same 'packing fudge & giving head' or 'superman returns was gay and singers a fag' or whatever.

Voicing your opinion? That's just spamming every thread. Fucking numbskull.

The only people I've headbutted here are AP (who's an obnoxious prick), the stupid prick who spams every thread (who I'm assuming is you) and those who've 'butted me first (i.e. El-bento). Three people. Go figure.

I'm up for a debate. Anytime. AP won't allow it. He shits his fat arse all over any debates.

"So, Urinator Douchebag, are you one of these? C'mon, fess up, twink."

Ok, this is the last time I'll play this game, shit-for-brains; 'None of the above.'

colors said...

those who've 'butted me first (i.e. El-bento).
Throw me a crumb, when did you and I ever get into it?

ApologistPuncher said...

"The only people I've headbutted here are AP (who's an obnoxious prick)"

Is this faggot with a "crush" who "doesn't care" what I say STILL itching for my attention?? What a SAD fucking anus-munching piece of shit you are.

And keep claiming you are NOT who you ARE, queen. I've already demonstrated my DOMINANCE over you, and you KNOW I'm right.

Here's where the homo says: "You think you dominated me, but I don't care what you say. Now I will respond to everything you say because I DON'T CARE WHAT YOU SAY! And when you respond to me, to show you just how much I DON'T care, I will continue to respond to YOU. And then, when you DON'T respond because you have a life unlike ME, I will cry and whine until you DO. Because I don't care what you say!!!".

I win, piss-gulper!

ApologistPuncher said...

"I was checking to see if AP had replied. Coincidental timing is all asswipe."

Yep, because you DON'T care what I have to say, right stinky?

Once AGAIN, for clarification:

"Feel free to count how many posts of mine you responded to, 'mo. Then think about just WHO "nobody" is....."

This fluffer is so STUPID, he thinks that by HIM saying "No, I don't care. Really, while I'm responding, I'm showing how much I don't care. So I win!" somehow makes it true?? It's like a fucking moron shoplifting Frito's, and while being handcuffed and led away, saying: "Ha ha, I don't even LIKE Frito's, so you have to let me go! Ha!".

This "logic" only makes sense to Apologists. Why? Because they are as stupid as a human being can get. REtard is proof of this.

Anonymous said...

AP and this site being owned again. Way to go "ap urinator" hahahahahahaha! Eat it guys tastes good as..............

MOS in 2009!

REstart

Fact hurt dont they. Take it up the ass AP. YOu know you like it.

Anonymous said...

^ Aren't most French medicines suppositories? I think we should leave the "taking it in the ass" thing to the pro's.

Anonymous said...

"Ok, this is the last time I'll play this game, shit-for-brains; 'None of the above.'"

Boo-hoo, the little crybaby faggot thinks he's some tough guy because of all the insults & profanity he spews, but YOU ARE from the Homopage, even IF you deny who you are in screen ID, & most likely you are one of those cocksuckers, even if I didn't guess the right name. Hey, tough guy, you're so tough, how about telling AP, colors, myself, & everyone else who you are? Maybe SSS needs to investigate your IP address, huh, cum-sucker?

ApologistPuncher said...

"Hey, tough guy, you're so tough, how about telling AP, colors, myself, & everyone else who you are? Maybe SSS needs to investigate your IP address, huh, cum-sucker?"

Two reasons why this WON'T happen:

1. It will DESTROY their little "ploy" of making it seem like their numbers are larger than they REALLY are.

2. Once it comes out who they are, and what their connection to the HomoPage is, it will cause "backlash" against their little shithole of a site.

Expect the follow-ups to state how "wrong" we are, and how they "don't care" what we say. But I DO know, and they DO "care".

They have a homosexual "crush" on me, and since I won't reciprocate, they "lash out" at yours truly. Pretty juvenile, don't you think?

Anonymous said...

"Expect the follow-ups to state how "wrong" we are, and how they "don't care" what we say. But I DO know, and they DO "care"."

Great point. If you TRULY don't care about something, you don't bother to respond or whatever other action may be necessary. You procrastinate, or even forget altogether, because it simply wasn't important enough for you to take ANY action on. It may slip your mind completely. Only later it's like, "Oh yeah, that!"

The brain-dead apologist sheep are NOT so. They claim NOT to care, but actions speak louder than words. They come on here & try to cuss us out, & I believe some of the same ones are now trying to tear down Emi's blog, even if they are a little milder on their language, but the drivel sounds the same: sucking Singerman's cock & licking his balls & rimming & fisting him, while simultaneously trying to cut ALL the realists down.

So there you have it. They don't 'care' but simultaneously they're hating us with a vehement hatred. Is vehement too complicated a word for the brain-dead ones? Anyway, they so much don't care that they won't even let it go. LIARS!

P.S. Expect the cocksucker to offer his usual rebuttal by cussing us all out & disputing every word I said. I have a name for the so-called AP Urinator: Piss Man!

Piss Man is a fag, & Superman Returns was gay.

Piss Man, giving head & packing fudge.

Piss Man has had some tail, just not female!

Anonymous said...

Really, piss man's identity is very easy to discern. He just can't alter his writing style and when he does, he reverts to one that is just as recognizable. Yes, he's from the SHP.

What would be nice is if these people would stop book marking this site and come over here to vent their frustrations. In a sense it's a control issue and the fart heads need therapy.

The Nazi Party once thought it was the majority and spoke for all of Germany and fed the country propaganda that led to a disastrous war because the German people, like sheep, fell for the lie.

Isn't humanity fucked up? Now you have webmaster's of Superman fan sites and it's followers acting like nerd Nazi's trying to feed everyone else their propaganda and bull shit.

Its a riot if you'll take the time to step back and look at the childishness of it.

Fuck all that shit.

Superman Returns was a suck ass movie, Singer doesn't deserve a sequel, what's fucked up about just acknowledging it?

God this shit is so hilarious. I'm going to up to the cabin.

Fuck this shit.

ApologistPuncher said...

I just took a look at the STUPIDITY that is the SingerHomoHype message board. There is a poster there, that is not only an Apologist piece of shit, but a fucking idiot to boot. Here is what is in (a REAL chick-magnet I bet!) "NightWing1977"'s signature line":

"~The problem with "Singer's suck blog"? Posters there are hateful, homophobic piece of trash instead of talking more about Superman."

First off, the asshole can't even put the CORRECT name of the Blog in his bullshit.

Next, admire the HORRIBLE sentence structure and judgmental nature of his "statement". Think he got his ass handed to him HERE more than once??

Anonymous said...

I'm a poster there and I put that fuckface on ignore a long time ago. There are more assheads like him who just don't wanna see the light of the day and rather remain in the dark - just like the Singersissy sequel.

Anonymous said...

What happened to Piss Man? Did he flee? He can dish it out but can't take it? Typical twink.

Anonymous said...

Of course Eunuch posted that Moviehole rumor bit about JLA and 'Superman 2 in the LA Times' and of course the sheep are already ranting about the Sucks sequel as if a fact.

D-E-N-I-A-L!

ApologistPuncher said...

"I'm a poster there and I put that fuckface on ignore a long time ago. There are more assheads like him who just don't wanna see the light of the day and rather remain in the dark - just like the Singersissy sequel."

This is what happens when you are in a "Singer-friendly Zone". They allow the Apologists to strut around, waving their 2-inchers like they are "the shit", all the while suppressing the opposite (but correct) viewpoint.

Then, what happens when these brainless FUCKS come HERE? They get the SHIT kicked out of them, and run away calling us "homophobes" and other BITCH tactics.

Hey, anyone getting caught up in the "hype" for Valkyrie yet? Hello? Anybody??

BS, thy career is FUCKED.

colors said...

Of course Eunuch posted that Moviehole rumor bit about JLA and 'Superman 2 in the LA Times' and of course the sheep are already ranting about the Sucks sequel as if a fact.
He's still clinging to a very dim hope. And he's not the only one. I never knew Singer had so many prolific websites in his pocket.

Then, what happens when these brainless FUCKS come HERE? They get the SHIT kicked out of them, and run away calling us "homophobes" and other BITCH tactics.
It's because there's no moderation here. Nobody is going to step in when they get in over their heads with their stupid "[Swooperman] made as much money as Batman Begins" crap.

Also, the Singerman fans I've seen on the Younis page and Blueballs honestly do seem to be kinda stupid.

BS, thy career is FUCKED.
It's so true.

ApologistPuncher said...

" I never knew Singer had so many prolific websites in his pocket."

It's amazing what a "set visit" will buy you these days, isn't it?

"It's because there's no moderation here. Nobody is going to step in when they get in over their heads with their stupid "[Swooperman] made as much money as Batman Begins" crap.

Also, the Singerman fans I've seen on the Younis page and Blueballs honestly do seem to be kinda stupid."

Because they are. They can try to "spin" the truth, but in the end their OWN WORDS "doom" them.

I sometimes read their responses to Younis' REtarded stories at the HomoPage, and it is ri-goddamn-diculous WHAT and HOW they say things. And the verbal "sucking off" by fellow Apologists is fucking PATHETIC too. "lol ya brendun was the bestest sooperman eva! he reals captyred the karacter way best than n e 1 b4! he is da great sooperman greater!!"

Anonymous said...

LOL! Don't you guys realize that "Brandon RUTH is the bestest Sooperman evre? LOL!

ApologistPuncher said...

"if dey make jla wthout brendan i will not sport it at all!! tim wailing is da suxor in smallvile! i hate da womans in der showin der boobies n buts! common has a good build tho n he wuld be da best black fuckstic... i mean green lantern eva!!"

colors said...

hehe sUperman returnz is teh greatest moviez evar bc it made more moneyz than Batman Beginning and that was successful so superman was too omglolz

- routhfan01
verisimilitude

Anonymous said...

The Sarah Connor show has that Summer Glau in it just so the starights will watch. I find it nearly as "animistic" as Smallville.

When will TV suits realise that fans are all homosexuals like me and Neal Bayley? Bryan Singer understood it.

Terminal

Anonymous said...

"(Beyond colors who obviously has your fat ass covered in more ways than one. Speaking of which...)"

Geez, all that Terminal bashing really hit a nerve, didn't it

Anonymous said...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homophobia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retard

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delusional

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basement

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life

Hope that helps y'all. Really.

We do wish you the best.

Anonymous said...

LOL.

Pwnt.

Anonymous said...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homophobia:Fear of Bryan Singer's next project

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection:Praying that the next Superman film is an improvement

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retard: A French fuckhead

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delusional:Thinking Singerman was in some way a success

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum:Found inside Steve Younis's head

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basement:Where Neal Bailey lives

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life:Wasted on apologists

God bless,
Father Finian Egan

Anonymous said...

"Hope that helps y'all. Really.

We do wish you the best."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lame

ApologistPuncher said...

"LOL.

Pwnt."

First, a HomoPage shit-snacker posts a fucking LAME "insult". No one "bites".

Said HomoPage shit-snacker "Returns" to "pat himself on the ass" by posting an even WORSE set of bullshit.

LOOK! I can do it TOO:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felching

Anymore "vague" articles recycling OLD stories you Apologists can latch-onto? Maybe the Classifieds guy stuck in a blurb about BJ Routh being "faster than a speeding bullet", which MUST mean he is playing Singerman again!!

In reality, he was referring to how fast he gets your order of cheese-fries out to you at the bowling alley he currently works for.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, but he's no doubt also asking if they want it 'super-sized.'

ApologistPuncher said...

I just saw this at the SingerHomoHype, and it illustrates EXACTLY what Apologists represent:

"Believe me I will give most things a chance. But will admit unless it's 20 years from now and it isn't a "Superman Returns" sequel. Then that would be it's first strike against it. If they don't have Brandon Routh it would be it's second. By that logic they have one more strike and they'd be out for me. I still would give it a chance. But unless it's 20 years from now I would be comparing any new actor against Chris and Brandon (actually I will even then). Which means not anyone would be Superman/Kal-El/Clark Kent. That's not even talking about the story. As I said I would give it a chance but it wouldn't bode well for me (unless it's a sequel or enough time has passed). I'll just say "Superman IV" was enough to show me even with a perfect actor for the role I just won't accept anything. So all films have to convince me it's worth seeing. I won't just watch any ol' thing.

Angeloz"

So, this nimrod ONLY likes BJ Routh and Singerman. NOT Superman as a character or "film hero", ONLY BJ and the Singerman. Does this idiot NOT see their self-centered, logic devoid BULLSHIT ramblings goes AGAINST themselves?

People like this are why I don't take Apologists seriously. They do more damage to their "cause" than I EVER could.

Anonymous said...

AP, can you provide the exact link, or at least point us in the right direction for your above post? Angeloz usually follows this up with more of the same.

ApologistPuncher said...

"AP, can you provide the exact link, or at least point us in the right direction for your above post? Angeloz usually follows this up with more of the same."

I can only handle "visits" to Singer-sucking sites in short intervals. A few minutes reading inane bullshit gives me a headache.

But it was in a thread called "Official BJ Routh wishes he was still Singerman" or some shit.

Anonymous said...

Disappointments like "Ghost Rider," "Elektra," the "Fantastic Four" films and even the most recent entries in the previously acclaimed "X-Men" and "Spider-Man" franchises has seen audience interest begun to wane or shift to non-Marvel produced comic book adaptations such as "300," "Batman Begins" or "Superman Returns". From Dark Horizons proving once again.......

Superman Returns one of the best comic book movie of all time.

REstart

Looks like MOS is on. Feels good to be right all the time. I must be European!

Anonymous said...

Looks like MOS is on
No script. No director. No budget. No pre-production. Pretty much no cast. No production window. No target release date.

No chance in hell.

Butt Cheese said...

Superman should be a 400lb black man in the next one...that should make everyone happy. Or, better yet, make him a transsexual...

I am joking, but wouldn't these both be better than Routh?

On a related topic, Routh's career has sure taken off since Singerman (that's sarcasim for you apologists).

Anonymous said...

"On a related topic, Routh's career has sure taken off since Singerman (that's sarcasim for you apologists)."

Hey, where's that night-club vampire flick that Routh is supposed to be in? That really ought to suck! Like Singerman! Or what about Dylan Dog? Or is that just doggie-style? And.......

Gay REtard, the TYPICAL, ignore-reality apologist!

ApologistPuncher said...

"Superman should be a 400lb black man in the next one...that should make everyone happy. Or, better yet, make him a transsexual..."

That would make both Terminal and swright VERY happy:

Terminal digs "dark meat", and swright dresses like Hannah Montana in his "private time".

Anonymous said...

Yeah, Terminal 'thanks dat Common is built adn is teh bom,' man!

Anonymous said...

Terminal, say hello to Fagley's 'butt' for me while you're down there.

voice_of_reason said...

How the hell would X3 and Spider-man 3 being disappointing cause people choices to shift to 300, Begins, and Singerman? When all 3 of those movie came out BEFORE Spider-man 3???

ReTard, you truly are a dumbass and a poser. Feels good to wreak of B.O. and cigarettes all the time. You must be European...

Anonymous said...

Singer loves testicles on his chin.

Anonymous said...

Taint that the truth

Anonymous said...

you all sucky sucky each other

ApologistPuncher said...

"you all sucky sucky each other"

Hey, look! An Apologist whose Mommy is having "success" controlling her little shit-demon! No "bad words" for this little 'mo, no sir!!

"u r very bad peoples! u like poo poo n r reals dum! i am asmart den u cuz u tuch urselfs in ur bad place!!"

We should feel bad for this kid though. I hear his dad pimps him out to REtarded Thai garbage-men. I mean, he LOVES getting the cock, but the SMELL drives him NUTS.

Anonymous said...

LEAVE BRYAN ALONE! Bryan is fantastic! He was so nice to me and my friends when he was in Sydney. He paid room service for all of us! He didn't have to do that! He did a line of blow off my butt but you know what? He ASKED first! And why? Because he's a GENTLEMAN. Something you BOIS know NOTHING about.! He made a beautiful movie about not giving up on your dreams,not giving up your one true love no matter how much the world wants to tear you apart. That hurts but so what? You buy some ointment and you carry ON! Bryan is hear to teach us, to lead us, like SUperman, Jesus Christ and George Lucas. You know nothing about that so SHUTUP haterz!!

Anonymous said...

Yeah, I bet 'BS' blowed your cock also.

Singer is a fag, & Superman Returns was gay.

Anonymous said...

ZOMG! u bitch!

Anonymous said...

"ZOMG! u bitch!"

You apologist fag!

Anonymous said...

Mee-OW! Iz 'apologist' the word of the day for u bois? Or word of the year? I guess you bitchez learn at least one word a year, though that might be stretching it (among other things ;). Thats what happens when you run a train on each other - you pick up each others vocab! Snaps honey!

ApologistPuncher said...

"Mee-OW! Iz 'apologist' the word of the day for u bois? Or word of the year? I guess you bitchez learn at least one word a year, though that might be stretching it (among other things ;). Thats what happens when you run a train on each other - you pick up each others vocab! Snaps honey!"

Ahh, a 'mo who thinks they are BOTH "hip" and "witty"!

What's the matter shitbird? Get tired of sucking the other little boys off at the HomoPage? Had to come here to get "slapped around"? SOMEBODY likes it "rough", eh?

Well, here ya go:

Rumor going around is, YOU don't WIPE. BS was heard to exclaim: "Somebody get this fucking chicken legged toy-boy some WIPES. It's like he SHIT all over my "'lil Singerman"!".

If THAT wasn't bad ENOUGH, he followed it up with: "I don't need 'em though. The little fuck sucked me clean!".

You sick fuck, "Felcher". No WONDER your breath stinks....

Anonymous said...

AP, want to take care of this illiterate moron?

Anonymous said...

Oh, sorry. I see you already did.

Anonymous said...

Choo choo!

ApologistPuncher said...

"Choo choo!"

Looks like "The Felcher" Bailey's wife is "open for business"! When both man & dog hear that whistle blowin', they get all "tingley" in their junk.

His Apologist friends? They don't even notice. They're too busy going to town on his and swright's gaping "back pussies".

BHoward1 said...

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117981504.html?categoryid=13&cs=1

Warner Bros. to serve 'Justice' in '09

Studio going full speed with superhero film
By DIANE GARRETT
Now that the writers strike has been resolved, Warner Bros. is pushing ahead with its plans to make "Justice League" in time for a 2009 debut.
Warners tried to get "Justice League" into production earlier, but put it on indefinite hold in January, allowing the cast options to expire (Daily Variety, Jan. 16). At the time, the studio said it didn't want to move ahead until the scribes had another shot at the script.More than one option(Co) Daily Variety
Filmography, Year, Role
(Co) Daily Variety

Scribes Kieran and Michele Mulroney are busy polishing up the script, which is expected back at the studio in several weeks, and the cast has been advised to keep training for their superhero roles. Director George Miller is in pre-production in Australia.

Adam Brody, cast as the Flash, is the biggest star in the superhero lineup. Rapper Common nabbed the Green Lantern role; other roles went to lesser-known thesps such as Armie Hammer Jr. (Batman) and Megan Gale (Wonder Woman).

"Justice League," based on a DC Comic, is a huge priority for the studio and considered a launching pad for future superhero projects down the line.

Warners needs another tentpole for its 2009 slate, which is a little thin at the moment. Studio had been vying for Roland Emmerich's "2012," but that project went to Sony. The studio just skedded "Terminator Salvation: The Future Begins" for May 22 and Spike Jonze's "Where the Wild Things Are" for Oct. 16. The only other pic it has dated is Zack Snyder's "Watchmen," set for release March 6.

Anonymous said...

Singer is a FAG and Superman Returns was gay.

Anonymous said...

With the "Justice League" film on hold and looking more unlikely by the day, a new rumor has sprung up - a shift in location.

The Sydney Morning Herald reports that Warner Bros. may be moving the entire production from Australia to Canada and is certainly pushing for that option with the film's helmer George Miller.

Miller though seems resolute to keep it locally in Sydney - "One of the reasons for doing Justice League in this country is the opportunity to bring back all the people we lost on Happy Feet who went overseas. We spent four years developing this talent and the cream of them left because they didn't have another film to go on to. The idea is to say come back, start off on Justice League then move onto Happy Feet 2."

Justice League was due to be shot at Fox Studios this year until Warner Bros suspended production last month. Miller describes the movie's current status as "precarious".

No way JLA!!Returns Sequel all the way!!!!

Superman will continue in 2009!

REstart

Que AP fucking or sucking someone and SSS remaining quiet while I outscoop the site again!

Anonymous said...

"...while I outscoop the site again!"

Retard




What is France like a week or two behind the rest of the world?

The sad fuck doesn't realise that it's difficult to "outscoop" anyone when you post old news.

Father Finian Egan

Anonymous said...

Good find bhoward, get it over to Emi's site!

Interestingly, no mention of who's playing Superman.

Also, thank hell, looks like no more Singerman.

Anonymous said...

Father

You stupid idiot my news is hotter. Here is another from CHUD.com.
http://chud.com/articles/articles/13794/1/THE-JUSTICE-LEAGUE-OF-CANADA/Page1.html

Father like AP and all americans you have shit for brains. Try checking your sources first. This is why WB 2009 tentpole will be..................

Singer's Return Sequel!

Restart

If I give you $100 Euros will you go away. You know thats $150 American.

Anonymous said...

"Interestingly, no mention of who's playing Superman."

WELLING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BHoward1 said...

"Good find bhoward, get it over to Emi's site!"

already done.

on a lighter note, we just need Uncle Bingo to come back to add fuel to the fire of all the anti-Justice League folks. His posts get them worked up more than anything.

BHoward1 said...

:) btw

i am i am superman said...

ah, this site never changes. oh well. at least it's a decent cure for boredom.

Butt Cheese said...

It's funny reading IESB's take on the Variety article. Although it was posted by "Stephanie Sanchez" it sounds extremely like Robert "Singer Sucker" Sanchez. I don't know what's really going to happen with JLA...or the next Superman feature. I'd like to think that the WB execs aren't stupid enough to bring Singer back, but who knows? I guess it all depends on how many licks it takes for Singer and Routh to get to the center of an execs cream filled tootsie roll pop.

I'm sure that's how he got the job in the first place...seriously...what was so fucking great about his pitch to them for Singerman that they just fell in love with it? Fucking morons...

ApologistPuncher said...

"I'm sure that's how he got the job in the first place...seriously...what was so fucking great about his pitch to them for Singerman that they just fell in love with it? Fucking morons..."

I believe I can answer that.

WB saw the fan's push for the "Donner Cut" of Superman II. Which was ok, but not "leaps & bounds" better than what Lester did. They figured people would EAT UP a new film steeped in Donner's continuity, and "thought" BS was going to deliver.

What did he do?

FIRST, he fucked-up the costume and casting. BJ "2X4" Routh and Brian Bosworth?? Strike one.

NEXT, he cherry-picked and outright COPIED things from Superman The Movie. Badly. Strike two.

THEN, he throws in a fucking SOAP OPERA "plot device", and gives Singerman a KID. The most "original" idea he had was something we've seen OVER and OVER and OVER again? Strike three, you pansy bitch. Singerman is OUT.

Anonymous said...

WB saw the fan's push for the "Donner Cut" of Superman II. Which was ok, but not "leaps & bounds" better than what Lester did
I prefer Lester's cut, myself. The Donner Cut's single redeeming value is the Brando stuff. That one guy on YouTube has made a bunch of scenes that are clearly SUPERIOR to the Donner Cut.

They're superior to Singerman too but you probably could've guessed that.

Anonymous said...

"You remember what happened the last time they shot a superhero film in Australia, right? Hint: Superman Returns."

Thanks for posting that link, Retard. Really helps your cause because it too acknowledges what a turkey Singerman was.

Nice work you fucking idiot.

Father Finian Egan
(an Aussie)

BHoward1 said...

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117981560.html?categoryid=13&cs=1

Warner Bros. is hoping for director George Miller to begin lensing superhero extravaganza "Justice League" in mid-July. The project has been off-and-on in the last several months, as the script needed work.

The minute the strike was over, scribes Kiernan and Michele Mulroney began rewriting the "Justice League" script. Studio is hoping to get a draft in the next six weeks.

Anonymous said...

The sky is blue.

Anonymous said...

Singerman, giving head & packing fudge.

Piss man, how do you say? Rimshot!

Anonymous said...

And you know all about rimshots, don't you? Or maybe not, since you can't see what's going on back there.

Anonymous said...

A is A.

Chris Crocker said...

Leave Bryan ALONE!!!!!! PLEASE!

Anonymous said...

You attract every other person in the universe with a force proportional to the product of your combined masses.

Anonymous said...

Bullshit, you Jersey queer. You run EVERY TIME we get into it, and don't even try to deny it.

And your "agenda" is to "defend" your Master and the HomoPage, as well as to WHINE to other sites about how much it "hurts" that people rip that little DICK to shreds. And you do a PISS POOR JOB of it too, sissy.
^^^
LOL at AP, the guy is probably the biggest cunt walking on God's green earth.

He's like one of those evangelical preachers who spend all day spilling their homophobic carp and right afterwards is down on their knees.

Dude is probably sucking Singer off right now as we speak.

It's amazing what happens when any dolt is given a chance to pitch in his two cents... the internet should receive an award for most time wasted reading trash from the minds of retarted fanboys or in AP's case, retarted fangirls who write like they're either missing part of their brain or are nine years old.

Don't brother replying AP, cause I CUNT hear you.

Anonymous said...

AP got his ass fried over at Emi-Jaynes.. People got sick of his bullshit over there real quick. Funnily enough, he's not been back since.

(AP will post over there now just to prove a point no doubt).

Seems like people here are also sick of the shit he spouts.

Yeah, hate SR. Great. I have problems with the film too, but if you cannot articulate your views without without personally attacking the poster by cursing, swearing, throwing sexual insults and the like (as AP does), well then you've yet to mature, frankly.

'Freedom of speach' doesn't cut it (as AP likes to advocate himself as it's champion).... He's like a drunken lout who has discovered a Karaoke mike, and just wants to make himself heard and fuck anyone else who doesn't like it.

This isn't an SSS blog - it's 'AP's shit-spouting' blog.

ApologistPuncher said...

"AP got his ass fried over at Emi-Jaynes.. People got sick of his bullshit over there real quick. Funnily enough, he's not been back since.

(AP will post over there now just to prove a point no doubt).

Seems like people here are also sick of the shit he spouts.

Yeah, hate SR. Great. I have problems with the film too, but if you cannot articulate your views without without personally attacking the poster by cursing, swearing, throwing sexual insults and the like (as AP does), well then you've yet to mature, frankly.

'Freedom of speach' doesn't cut it (as AP likes to advocate himself as it's champion).... He's like a drunken lout who has discovered a Karaoke mike, and just wants to make himself heard and fuck anyone else who doesn't like it.

This isn't an SSS blog - it's 'AP's shit-spouting' blog."

Since you are the same person, responding to himself, I'll reply to THIS lame-assed post.

Are you THAT jealous of my ability to kick the shit out of you ignorant morons that you have to "pretend" to be two seperate people? Do I get in that morbidly-obese head so much that you CAN'T stop thinking about me? Jesus, I knew you Apologists were homosexuals and had a "mad on" for this site, but YOU are barking up the WRONG tree here, missy.

And "hasn't been back since"?? Wipe the cum crust out of your eyes, you Apologist ass residue. MY posts are recent. YOU are such a faggoty BITCH you will probably try to take credit for other "anonymous" posts there. But those of us who don't frequent the HomoPage and BlueNuts actually have what is referred to as "intelligence".

Look it up, and ask mommy why you were born without it, 'k junior?

ApologistPuncher said...

"Don't brother replying AP, cause I CUNT hear you."

Oh, and as to this: You'll STILL read it, fuckwad.

And of course you "CUNT" hear me. You haven't been close to one since you were shit forth from your blubbery momma's cavern.

Anonymous said...

"Since you are the same person, responding to himself, I'll reply to THIS lame-assed post."

You really do dislike the idea that more than one person hates you, don't you? We are two different people you dick-splash.

And thank you for underlining my point about people making foul-mouthed sexual attacks being immature morons.

Guess what? I laugh at those so-called insults you think are so scathing. Trouble is, you think that they're serious put-downs and that people round here think you're great. Wrong again.

"But those of us who don't frequent the HomoPage and BlueNuts actually have what is referred to as "intelligence". "

What?! What is remotely intelligent about the tripe you post? Get a fucking clue Jonny - you're the internet equivalent of a bitchy girl hoping that if you shout loud and long enough, it makes you the voice of reason.

Again, wrong. It makes you look like, as the poster before me stated, a cunt.

No doubt you'll continue with the foul language and second grade sexual attacks, and continue to underline my point about your lack of maturity further.

P.S. Before you comment that I too have used foul language, I have only used such language here because it seems that it is the only thing you recognise. Perhaps that's why you didn't like Singerman.

Oh, and using caps-lock almost every other word, thinking it makes your comments somehow more important, also makes you look as if your IQ is struggling to break 80+.

ApologistPuncher said...

"You really do dislike the idea that more than one person hates you, don't you? We are two different people you dick-splash.

And thank you for underlining my point about people making foul-mouthed sexual attacks being immature morons.

Guess what? I laugh at those so-called insults you think are so scathing. Trouble is, you think that they're serious put-downs and that people round here think you're great. Wrong again."

Nope, you are INDEED the same person, cum funnel. I guess it takes a person of "superior" intelligence to think that by saying: "nu-uh it wuznt me it was a sum1 else!!" means SHIT.

And YOUR faggot ass thinks I'm "great", or else you wouldn't be so in love with me, queer.

"No doubt you'll continue with the foul language and second grade sexual attacks, and continue to underline my point about your lack of maturity further.

P.S. Before you comment that I too have used foul language, I have only used such language here because it seems that it is the only thing you recognise. Perhaps that's why you didn't like Singerman."

You have to HAVE a "point" FIRST, you low-rent piece of shit.

I love your attempt at "justifying" your homosexually-themed "tripe" by saying "u did it first time so i getz to to!!". Showing your age there, chicken legs.

"Oh, and using caps-lock almost every other word, thinking it makes your comments somehow more important, also makes you look as if your IQ is struggling to break 80+."

Oh, and attempting to downgrade someone's IQ, even though you KNOW it is superior to yours, shows you for being a JUVENILE, and also your pathetic ENVY of my intelligence. Perhaps that is why you DID like Singerman.

That, and you are a flaming homosexual. And a coward.

Anonymous said...

Oh, those comments really hurt.. NOT you fucking retard. Coward? Hold on...

Gingerman said...

You think I'm a coward because I don't sign with a name? There you go shit-for-brains.

And, once again, you've underlined my point again about your mentality. Keep up the good work chump...

ApologistPuncher said...

"You think I'm a coward because I don't sign with a name? There you go shit-for-brains.

And, once again, you've underlined my point again about your mentality. Keep up the good work chump..."

Yep, TRUE Apologist here. Ignore the parts that FUCK YOU UP, and keep repeating your tired bullshit.

Keep on proving your age, toy-boy.

Gingerman said...

...and again...

Sepharih said...

"Trouble is, you think that they're serious put-downs and that people round here think you're great."

I think AP is great.

Anonymous said...

AP being owned again. Take that you loser. JLA without Batman and Superman means.......

Singer will continue in 2009!

REstart

Believe it smack AP down again. He like Necrophillia!

Anonymous said...

Yeah, Singerman film in summer 2009. No script, no anything. And Gay REtard is still...........

REtarded in 2009!

Gingerman said...

"I think AP is great."

Well I'm sure AP is glad you have his ass covered. You might want a set of earplugs though, he spends most of his time talking through it.

But bless, at least AP's got one little internet buddy, eh?...

Anonymous said...

"JLA without Batman and Superman means.......

Singer will continue in 2009!"

Good old Retard. Two weeks behind the rest of the world again

Fuckin pathertic

Anonymous said...

But bless, at least AP's got one little internet buddy, eh?...


Yawn

theCOLORSblend said...

Ah, Restart's back. I was about to say "the real leader emerges"... but then I remembered the French don't lead at anything.

Incidentally, the wisdom behind the Apologist Puncher's preference (and mine) for unmoderated forums is making itself known over on emijayne's blog. Now that everyone's on a leash, it's interesting how all the whiney crybaby Apologists are coming out of the woodwork.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, and people who were calling for moderation are now calling for AP to sort out the apologists!

"but then I remembered the French don't lead at anything."

They are famous for leading the retreat or surrender.

Father Finian Egan

Anonymous said...

Singer loves cock in his ass.

Gingerman said...

"Singer loves cock in his ass."

I guess you'd know, huh? I bet it's dark in that closet.

Anonymous said...

Singerman, giving head & packing fudge.

ApologistPuncher said...

"I guess you'd know, huh? I bet it's dark in that closet."

This kid speaks from experience.

I see there is a HUGE HomoPage queer suckfest going on over at emijayne's Blog. Can't say I didn't warn her, and it'll be the end of people's interest in her site. Mark my words.

ApologistPuncher said...

"They are famous for leading the retreat or surrender."

Well, the truth is they don't "lead" the surrender. That would take them thinking about someone other than THEMSELVES. They just do it to save their own asses.

So they can turn around and give them up to their new overlords.

theCOLORSblend said...

I see there is a HUGE HomoPage queer suckfest going on over at emijayne's Blog.
It's a bit more balanced with some Realists speaking up without concern for being banned for calling Singer and his hackjob movie the piece of shit it always was. Moderation (which has yet to be enforced on her blog from what I can see) doesn't change the facts.

Anonymous said...

Singer is a FAG and Superman Returns was gay.

Ayuhuasca said...

Free Superman! No more Singer! No more Routh! Give us what we want!

Anonymous said...

Singer, my balls itch. C'mon & supply that world famous service.

Maria Gabriela said...

Singer Talks Superman Returns Sequel
Exclusive: Director confirms development

Earlier today, IESB reported that rumours were flying that Bryan Singer was working on a sequel to Superman Returns. Well, we've spoken to Singer and he's confirmed that work's under way on the film that some said would never happen because the first was perceived as a flop.

"That movie made $400 million!" Singer says incredulously. "I don’t know what constitutes under-performing these days...Look, I can understand, I suppose, what some people mean. Perhaps some people went in with the expectation of it being like an X-Men film, and Superman is a tougher character than that. Especially bringing him back. It really goes back to the fact that you can only please some of the people some of the time. But, yes, I’m just getting back with writers after the strike. We’re just in the development phase. I’m starting to develop a sequel...with the intention of directing it."

Singer knows that there was some negative reaction to the fact that the first film focused more on story at the expense of action and is looking to redress that next time.

“The first one was a romantic film and a nostalgic film,” he says. “I’ll be the first person to own up to that without making any apologies for it. I knew it was going to be that from the outset. And now that the characters are established, there’s really an opportunity to up the threat levels...Clearly there’ll be a body count [laughs]. From frame one, it will be unrelenting terror! All those teenage girls who found the movie and mooned over James Marsden or Brandon? Well, I’m going to wake them up!” He may be joking about the unrelenting terror.

We have to say, we actually enjoyed a huge amount about Superman Returns. Brandon Routh made a terrific Superman and Clark Kent and Singer clearly cared about the characters. It was light on action, so it would be great to see a sequel in which we get to actually experience what Supes can really do.


WPWHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA bye bye Singerman

Anonymous said...

Sounds just like another Singersucking report from IESB - the masters of false information!

By the way: I also wonder why someone like Singer would talk to such a tiny fanboy site instead of a real movie website!? And he pretty much pissed on his own movie!?

--> Yeah right! *rollseyes*

Anonymous said...

Focused more on story? No sorry the film tanked cos the story was shit! Take away everything that they stole, sorry paid homage to from the Donner film and theres basically fuck all, apart from a bastard love child no one wants. Jeez singer do us all a favor and FUCK OFF!

Anonymous said...

http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=22165
Confirmed by Empire.suck it asshats.

Anonymous said...

Confirmed by empire doesn't mean shit jackass. I remember when empire spoke to Nic Cage bout being cast in Burtons non existant film and when they interviewed Anthony Hopkins who was gonna play Jor-El in Ratners abandoned pic. Dont start jacking off too soon all you singerman lovers. Till the cameras start rolling with singer at the helm, anything can happen. Theres still time for him to fuck off for no reason just like his singerman did.

Anonymous said...

HA HA HA WE WIN YOU FUCKERS. GET READ FOR THE ADVENTURES OF SUPERMAN... and son.. oh shit. Nobody wins.

Anonymous said...

“From frame one, it will be unrelenting terror! All those teenage girls who found the movie and mooned over James Marsden or Brandon? Well, I’m going to wake them up!”

Uh-oh, sounds like Singer is going to drop a Schumacher-bomb on the Superman franchise!

Anonymous said...

"Uh-oh, sounds like Singer is going to drop a Schumacher-bomb on the Superman franchise!"

What are you talking about? He already did. It was called "Superman Returns".

And hooray for me for making #200 post. Yaaay!

«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 311   Newer› Newest»