Wednesday, February 04, 2009

Freedom Of Speech Under Attack


Hey everyone,

It appears that a fellow "Anti-Bryan Singer/BJ Routh" site has been forced to temporarily "close up shop" because a certain group doesn't believe Freedom Of Speech applies to EVERYONE.

www.savesuperman.com

This site has been a pretty good place to go and meet REAL fans of Superman, hear a few "rumors" about what may or may not be happening with the Superman reboot, and not have to worry about dealing with illiterate 12 year old Apologists. It's pretty harmless, even though things COULD get a little "heated" over there. But NOW a "gay rights group" has filed a lawsuit against the site's owner, Steve "Archangel" Manning. Why?

Because he doesn't agree with homosexuality.

Is that it?? Yes indeed it is. Because he DARED to say that on his site, he is now being accused of "spreading hate" and of "not being a legitimate news site". Did you get that? Saying you don't agree with homosexuality is NOW "spreading hate". This "gay rights group" feels that Freedom Of Speech means: "Agree with me, or shut your mouth". Funny thing about that though, is I was always taught that it applied to EVERY American citizen, not just to certain "individuals"? Silly me I guess.

I am 100% certain his site will be up and running in no time, and I look forward to finding out just WHO this "group" is and laughing at their pathetic AUDACITY. Frivolous lawsuits are a waste of taxpayer time and money, and I hope they get what is coming to them in the "end".

Unbelievable.

**UPDATE**

Well, I've been given an update by a "source" close to what is going on. It appears it isn't even based on what the SITE-OWNERS "said", but by people VISITING THE SITE. Myself included. Isn't this just getting BETTER & BETTER by the second?

I am going to look into this "group" once it is made public, and see what exactly THEY have been saying. I'm sure it will take about as long to find "dirt" on them, as it would to find an Apologist who can't spell.....

More to follow, I'm sure.

*****BIIIIGGG UPDATE*****

Well, well, well. It looks like this "group" that started this LAME calamity is F-A-K-E! It's title? "United Federation for Equality and Understanding" These DOUCHEBAGS are a bunch of Apologist morons who "thought" they can SILENCE the vocal-majority who HATED Singerman Peeps using the American judicial system as their "weapon of choice". What did they get instead? LAUGHED AT, and threatened with a potential lawsuit of their own for perpetrating a FRAUD of the site's Webmaster, Steve "ArchAngel" Manning.

I told you this would be a laugher, and it turns out I was right. I just hope we get to find out what screennames these LOSERS use on the various forums out there. It's time for some payback, methinks....

172 comments:

Anonymous said...

Let me quote AP:

"This site has been a pretty good place to go and meet REAL fans of Superman, hear a few "rumors" about what may or may not be happening with the Superman reboot, and not have to worry about dealing with illiterate 12 year old Apologists."

Yes, indeed, savesuperman.com has really been a blessing in some ways. Even though things may get heated at times & you don't necessarily 100% agree with a fellow poster, for the most part I'd say we respect each other's opinions & are on the same side, i.e., we want a REAL Superman film, not the travesty that Singer 'thrust' upon us.

At Steve's site, we can post with 'like-minded' individuals that I perceive are usually also adult fans, so we know the characters even from years past. Hey, some of us even READ the comics back in the day! Imagine that!

However, at these 'pro-Singerman' sites, IF we post there, we're definitely in the minority. We're subject to 'banning' if we get out of line, but 'duh' apologists seem to be able to attack US with immunity. Don't believe me? Then go on their sites & post how you feel about the reboot, etc. You'll likely be attacked with name-calling & general offence by their 'populace'. You'll be the 'pariah' of THAT site. Although a handful may accept you & respect your opinion, MOST will be AGAINST you & are subject to attack you IMMEDIATELY!

Yeah, Steve Manning, PLEASE hurry & get back online ASAP!

non_amos

Anonymous said...

I say we troll sites that are pro singerman. I go on SHH and tell them how shit Singerman is and how bad it would be to use Routh again and that stupid bitch Mostpowerful rounds up the gang and they then attempt to bash the shit out of you until you are forced to leave. That stupid bitch needs a punch to the face and to fucking get of the computer.

theCOLORSblend said...

She goes by the name Stargazer on Blue Tights and Solaris on the Younis page.

And yes, she's freaking psychotic.

Anonymous said...

People bash online all the time, not just Steve's site, nor this site. It's not even just this genre. You can go online on any number of message boards, any subject, & find what these people deem 'homophobic comments'.

It's all over the Internet, so I say to these kooks just GET A LIFE!

Anonymous said...

The only two people who could have been in anyway offended are Bryan Singer and Brandon Ruth. One's openly gay and the other is making a career out of playing gay characters.

Why don't these "offended" people go after just about every religious website on the planet? The Church has been openly critical of homosexuality for about two thousand years, and some conservative Bible belt groups will especially spread their hatred of homosexuals to many more people than a website wanting a better take on a Superman movie.

I have gay friends. Nice guys who I take the piss out of regularly, like they do me. They even are about to be married. Good luck to them, let em do what they want as long as they don't make a Superman movie where Supes camps about the place wearing a fetish suit!

Father Finian

theCOLORSblend said...

Wow, so it wasn't even about what was posted on SaveSuperman? AP's right, that organization Terminal founded has absolutely no understanding of the concept of free speech.

Anonymous said...

What organization is Terminal supposed to have founded? What am I missing here? Is he not still at the Homopage, or does he no longer post there?

As for the picture AP posted of the Advocate magazine, 'How Gay is Superman?" Well, looks like the answer is right there on the cover, our very own 'Bobby Long'. ;)

Speaking of that, I remember watching Jay Leno back when Singerman was new in the cinema, & even HE asked if Superman was gay!

I think THAT speaks VOLUMES as to what Singer 'did' to our beloved franchise! :(

non_amos

theCOLORSblend said...

"What organization is Terminal supposed to have founded? What am I missing here? Is he not still at the Homopage, or does he no longer post there?"
Oh I'm sure he still posts on the Younis page, I was just making a funny out of connecting the "gay organization" thing to Terminal. Twas all a joke. At his expense.

The Star Treker said...

That is a load of crap. I might not like that Steve is prejudice to homosexuals and he might be an Anti-Bryan Singer/BJ Routh but I'm not going to do a lawsuit against him and tell him remove the website just because he is prejudice and hates Bryan Singer/BJ Routh.

SaveSuperman.com is a pretty nice website like CountingDown.com or Trek United and I get to talk with other fellow Superman/Smallville fans on there even most of them might hate Superman Returns.

I hope Steve get this load of crap resolve soon.

ApologistPuncher said...

"I might not like that Steve is prejudice to homosexuals and he might be an Anti-Bryan Singer/BJ Routh"

First off, THIS isn't SaveSuperman.com, so if you try your "BJ love" HERE, you will see NO "mercy". Keep that in mind.

Secondly, who are YOU to say Steve is "prejudiced"? Do you know the meaning of the word, son? Not agreeing with a "lifestyle choice" does NOT make one "prejudiced". Did you see ANYONE say THEY were gay, and Steve "ban" them, or allow people to rip them to shreds? No? You JUST saw him say he disagreed with it?

YOU are the type of person who encourages these ASSHOLES to do these kinds of things. Your milquetoast whining and casting of aspersions is PATHETIC. Don't expect I, or probably ANYONE who posts there, to forget about THIS little "gem".

The Star Treker said...

I know this is not SaveSuperman.com. I might like Superman Returns and I liked BJ alright but I really prefer Tom Welling or someone else better to play the role and someone can make the next film right like Nolan done for Batman in Batman Begins and The Dark Knight. And it doesn't mean I'm a BJ lover or obsessed over him just because I liked him alright in SR. When I first saw SR I used to love it but not that much anymore since a bunch of the people on CountingDown.com and all you others' disliking on the film started rubbing on me.

Apparently you are the one that don't know the meaning of prejudice. Not agreeing or being against homosexuality or even not agreeing with that "lifestyle choice" is prejudice too. It's like racist, sexist, or even discriminating the handicap. My grandparents are prejudice too but I'm not against them. So I'm not against Steve either. I don't care if he doesn't agree with homosexuality or not because I can't stop him from having that kind of life style like I can't stop my grandparents having that kind either and they have rights to choose to live that way. They were raised different than I was and they lived where people believed other color skin was not equal and believe homosexuality is a sin.

I don't think you understand me what I'm trying to say. Do you seeing me whining, attacking anyone, and how am I encouraging these assholes when I don't like them at all? I like people that are intelligent, have common sense, and are nice and polite.

I'm trying to say that this "group" is just a load of crap they want to do a lawsuit towards Steve because they had a fussy fit over that he doesn't agree with homosexuality or he doesn't like Bryan Singer/BJ Routh. It doesn't look like they know the meaning of freedom of speech either. They are just plain stupid and pathetic. I support Steve not these idiots.

ApologistPuncher said...

"Not agreeing or being against homosexuality or even not agreeing with that "lifestyle choice" is prejudice too. It's like racist, sexist, or even discriminating the handicap."

Wow, keep digging that shallow-grave Einstein. Now he is like a "racist"? Jesus, you are quite a judgmental little "labeler", aren't you?

Here, let me help you with something:

prej-u-dice

Irrational suspicion or hatred of a particular group, race, or religion.

Once again, show me WHERE Steve was EVER "irrational" or showed "hatred" to ANY homosexul there on SaveSuperman.com. Anywhere. I GUARANTEE you can't do it, but won't let REALTY warp your ignorant and "PC" BULLSHIT "mind".

Singerman Peeps sucked, anyone who proclaims to "like" it sucks, and BJ Routh has a "beard".

These are all matters of undeniable fact.

Anonymous said...

One thing DEFINITELY missing due to Steve Manning's absence is our ability to IMMEDIATELY discuss the newest episode of Smallville, & I mean REAL discussion. I DON'T mean a bunch of whining apologists crying that Welling will never wear the suit, how ugly the WOMEN are, how much it sucked, & other such nonsense.

Actually, the bit with Super Lana DID kinda suck. I mean, Season 8 was getting praise even over on Steve's site due to the new team of 'PS3'. Now recently some have begun to doubt this new team because since Lana came back it's like AlMiles Part Deaux.

I mean, let's face it. Lana was already a 'martial arts expert' & now she's super on top of that. To add insult to injury, we now ONCE AGAIN have Clark whining & pining away after her, & now that Lana absorbed the Kryptonite blast, Clark is even willing to subject HIMSELF to poisoning to try & be with her.

A question. What exactly has happened to LOIS anyway? THAT'S where the fans WANT the show to go, not this recycled crap. Oh, & Oliver blew Lex to Kingdom Come on top of everything else, & the remains were confirmed to be Lex.

So where does the mythology go from here? Was that Luthor's 'clone? Or was that just more AlMiles typical 'butcher the franchise' to the point that we may even cry for a reboot of SMALLVILLE, much LESS the FILM franchise. :(

non_amos

theCOLORSblend said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
theCOLORSblend said...

"A question. What exactly has happened to LOIS anyway? THAT'S where the fans WANT the show to go, not this recycled crap."
I don't know. I just don't know.

"Oh, & Oliver blew Lex to Kingdom Come on top of everything else, & the remains were confirmed to be Lex."
Easy now. No need to sound like Neal "Chicken Little" Bailey. He bitches all the time about plots, subplots and character stuff that any idiot knows will be developed further later on. And the douchebag Apologist twits lap it all up. He did this with the Clark vs. Doomsday non-fight in Bride. He knows perfectly well they'll probably square off later. PS3 ain't gonna blow their load in that one episode.

Same for goes for Ollie's bombing. Lex ain't dead, chuckles. Never happen

Anonymous said...

I wanna know who made the deleted comment & what was said. Anyone know?

non_amos

Anonymous said...

So what is the basis of the suit, the web site owner said something or allowed something to be said the group suing didn't like? How is this going to stand up in court? Where are the damages? If Steve Manning was operating a news site or an opinion blog it is irrelevnt, they are both free speech. What is their intent, to go after you AP for posting something they did not like? Or other posters? That would be like suing people who left comments at news site, that is all but impossible and would actually open them up to counter litigation.

It seems laughable and I am suprised the web site owner complied to take the site. I can't see how it was not completely frivilous.

The Man From Krypton said...

Singer is a fag, and his movie sucked homo cock!

Tell them I said so!

They ain't shutting me down!

Anonymous said...

Singerman, giving head & packing fudge.

Can we say that?

ApologistPuncher said...

They are trying to pin things to Steve that not only did I say, but others posting in this very thread as well. Not examples of what HE said, but the replies to the different "articles" posted there.

And yes, what they are doing can backfire BIG TIME when things are all said & done.

Anonymous said...

I certainly don't agree with those attacking Steve but I still don't even understand the basis of their suit. How are they suing someone over posted opinions? What are they hoping to collect? What are the damages? I wish Steve could say more.

theCOLORSblend said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
theCOLORSblend said...

"I certainly don't agree with those attacking Steve but I still don't even understand the basis of their suit. How are they suing someone over posted opinions? What are they hoping to collect? What are the damages? I wish Steve could say more."
I don't know but my guess would be that the issue has taken the form of cease and desist/delete the "offending" material. That's why who said what is the issue.

In some ways, this could be a good thing. People live in perpetual fear of offending the homosexual community so much that they've adopted a vernacular that is all but written by a bunch of looney and angry homosexual activists. The facts are that (1) homosexuals make up less than 3% of the population (2) most people don't give two craps what they do in their private lives and (3) those same people don't appreciate being made to feel guilty or like a bigot just because they don't think homosexuality is in any way a "natural lifestyle".

This thing may be too small but part of me hopes that Steve not only wins but that in so doing some precedents are set about what angry homosexual activists can and cannot file lawsuits and other legal measures about.

Anonymous said...

There is talk on other boards that there was no lawsuit but that Steve shut it down for lack of funds. Not saying I buy that, it didn't look like an expensive site to run by any measure. Howevever, I wonder if it is true that he just took it down because it got aggravating. I also find it hard to believe someone hit a site with a lawsuit that is obvioulsly less than small potatoes. What damages could you possibly hope to collect.

Steve Wright said...

I know I'm hated here, but I have to ask. If it's a problem with what people are saying in the forums (which is fucking ridiculous to file a lawsuit over)is there a way that Steve could keep the site up for news updates? No forum activity, but just letting us know what he is hearing?

One of the reasons I was always at the site knowing I was not wanted was because Steve would break stories and had inside knowledge. Before that we had Emi's blog. I hope he may be able to work something out.

"There is talk on other boards that there was no lawsuit but that Steve shut it down for lack of funds."

That's ridiculous. Websites are not overly expensive. And, Steve is very upfront with us. He would have just told us that he couldn't keep it up but would switch back to a blog like this one.

"What damages could you possibly hope to collect."

None. It's not about that. When groups like this start this shit, it's just to cause trouble and give headaches to those they target. If it's GLAAD, they are well funded and can afford to do something like this.

The Man From Krypton said...

Hey Steve can you tell them I said that SUPERMAN RETURNS SUCKED AS MUCH COCK AS SINGER DOES?

I mean I wouldn't want my freedom of speech to go un used in this whole mess since I was the fan who told Dan Harris in an AIM that his movie would suck dick, and he didn't listen to me, and the convo was spread all over the net!

Now that the movie has indeed flocked I want my 15minutes of fame! I want to tell all these faggots that I TOLD YOU SO!

Now if the WB is smart they will ditch the homo erotic Singerman, and make a real SUPERMAN movie.

Anonymous said...

"Now if the WB is smart they will ditch the homo erotic Singerman, and make a real SUPERMAN movie."

Whether or not Welling actually DOES don the tights or not, the main focus of a REAL Superman film should be the STORY!

We don't need ANYTHING even REMOTELY effiminate about THIS Superman film. I say get the story right FIRST, THEN go from there with casting, etc. I originally thought Singer had at least a somewhat interesting idea, at least on paper, especially compared to previous failed attempts, BUT..... the finished product failed to deliver, & even differed from what I originally read.

Whatever plot they decide on, please make Supes a MAN! Is THAT too much to ask?! I'd say make him at least somewhat like either the Golden Age 'Earth-2' Superman OR like the Kingdom Come version, in character AND toughness, & then get a guy who PHYSICALLY fits the bill!

Do this, & get the story right, & we might be in business.

non_amos

Anonymous said...

"There is talk on other boards that there was no lawsuit but that Steve shut it down for lack of funds."

Please provide links so we can see this for ourselves.

non_amos

ApologistPuncher said...

"is there a way that Steve could keep the site up for news updates?"

No. Part of their "suit" contends that he is NOT a "legitimate news site", and therefore I believe they filed an "injunction" preventing him from maintaining the site.

I guarantee you this was started by some Apologist fuckwits. One of those nancy-boys must be gay, and went running to their "sisters in anus" with BULLSHIT stories about that site. You DON'T need "facts" when it comes to starting shit in the legal system, obviously.

Anonymous said...

"Part of their "suit" contends that he is NOT a "legitimate news site", and therefore I believe they filed an "injunction" preventing him from maintaining the site."

Correct me if I'm wrong, but since when did Steve CLAIM his site to be a news site, per se that is?

It's a comics site dedicated to the effort to salvage the Superman franchise. Obviously, as such, there has been some REAL news reported, but also a LOT of rumors & gossip as well. Also a LOT of FAN'S OPINIONS, conjecture, & such.

So basically Steve runs a FAN SITE dedicated to Superman, just like any number of fan sites dedicated to almost ANYTHING, rock bands, you name it! As such, since when does Steve have to try & be a 'legitimate' news source like, say, CNN? Yeah, we'd expect CNN to get ALL the facts 'straight', but this is about a fan site & where does this group 'get off' thinking THEY can 'DIC-tate' what Steve does on HIS site? I say BRING BACK savesuperman.com!

On a 'related' note, it was a shock tonight to see on the show 'Brothers & Sisters' that the now out-of-the-closet character named Saul finally revealed his 'boyfriend', & guess what, he was played by none other than.....JOHN GLOVER! Yeah, THAT John Glover. Lionel Luthor himself.

What a shock, & what a shame! But that sorta thing is NOW on a MAJORITY of our TV programs, including kissing. The thing is is that MOST viewers are offended & don't like that material in their programs, i.e., they LIKE the series but they DON'T like the 'alternative' making-out on the show. It's almost like we're being 'force-fed' this material even in our various TV programs, etc., whether we WANT it or NOT!

Steve would REALLY have an opinion on THAT!

non_amos

Anonymous said...

"...since I was the fan who told Dan Harris in an AIM that his movie would suck dick"

You deserve a cigar Sir. Especially if you called it before seeing it.

I wasted ten bucks giving it the benefit of doubt until I'd seen it.

Gotta say, I feel bad for Steve Manning over all of this mess. I'm a leftie from way back, but I still can't see what he's done wrong.

Anonymous said...

"I know I'm hated here...."Wrighty

Oh come on now. You've been a vocal Welling supporter, even over at the Homepage.

You can't be THAT bad.

Father Finian Egan...and the post above, forgot to sign off.

Anonymous said...

...oh and, thank fuck Lana is done with on Smallville!

Father Finian Egan

Anonymous said...

Singer sux cox.

Anonymous said...

I'm sure AP will let you all know the scoop and I will certainly have it on SaveSuperman when I return home, but after traveling 1200 miles to fix the issue with the gay rights group "United Federation for Equality and Understanding", it turns out they aren't even legally incorporated. It was formed by a group of nut jobs who read the forums and got tired of us bashing Singer and Routh.

As for those who tried claiming we shut down due to lack of funds, that's the funniest thing I've ever heard. The hosting costs me less than $60 a year and Emily builds websites and databases as her normal job.

We'll be back up in about a week or so folks! Keep your eyes open and expect me to fight harder than ever against these dumbasses who think they are the true Superman fans. I am PISSED OFF and payback is a bitch!

Singer and Routh suck each other!! How do you like those comments fudge packers!!

Steve "Archangel" Manning
steve@savesuperman.com

Anonymous said...

That's GREAT news, Steve! But what is 'United Federation for Equality & Understanding'? I've never heard of them, & it sounds like a BAD name for a wrestling fereration LOL!

"It was formed by a group of nut jobs who read the forums and got tired of us bashing Singer and Routh."

You SURE that wasn't the Homopage, Steve? Sounds like the 'modus operandi' of our very own beloved TERMINAL! He has that in 'common', ya know. ;)

Steve, don't even WAIT a week if possible, & is there any NEW info you can give us?

Steve Wright said...

good to hear Steve. Oh, and NONAMOS, John glover is gay. Open and out of the closet for years.

Anonymous said...

Oh, I forgot.

non_amos

You're welcome.

theCOLORSblend said...

"What did they get instead? LAUGHED AT, and threatened with a potential lawsuit of their own for perpetrating a FRAUD of the site's Webmaster, Steve "ArchAngel" Manning.
- AP"
Steve should sue 'em right back. I don't think there'd be much you could in the end but misery loves company.

Anonymous said...

The "lack of funds" comment came from Filmnerdjamie at SHH in the SR forums.

Anonymous said...

Filmnerdjamie, giving head & packing fudge.

Anonymous said...

"The "lack of funds" comment came from Filmnerdjamie at SHH in the SR forums."

I found this link:

http://forums.superherohype.com/showthread.php?t=297798&page=387

Quotes from this moron:

"There were no lawyers or "threats of a lawsuit" involved.

King Jackass couldn't afford to keep the website running. Nothing more, nothing less."

"He's clearly an ass and (more so) an idiot. But I don't find it amusing to speculate that he could have lost his job."

But look at how FilmNerdJamie describes himself:

"Allergic to Dumbasses"

Takes one to KNOW one? ;)

non_amos

Anonymous said...

"King Jackass couldn't afford to keep the website running. Nothing more, nothing less."

Someone track that moron down

Father Finian Egan

Anonymous said...

"Someone track that moron down"

Yeah, Steve, SUE him for slander & libel! Do to them as they THOUGHT to do to you.

non_amos

P.S. And savesuperman.com has better forums than these BS/BJ lovers anyway. At least we're REAL Superman fans, not Singerman fans.

Anonymous said...

Does this not look like this poster(Mostpowerful) you guys are talking about had something to do with this group when asked about the savesuperman boards:

http://forums.superherohype.com/showthread.php?p=16383181#post16383181

The Star Treker said...

Here is what this idiot FilmNerdJamie said to me:
“Websites like CHUD and WWTDD have never been threatened with legal action and they've posted some pretty mean stuff. If it hasn't happened to sites that alot of people actually go to, then one like SS (where its members are about 20 people...tops) haven't been either.

Put down the Kool-Aid. Go back to your Master King Jackass and tell him if he wants to confront me to do.it.himself and stop sending his idiot minions.

He really traveled "1200 miles" over this? Sure, he did.”

http://forums.superherohype.com/showthread.php?p=16422602#post16422602

Anonymous said...

And look what the Mod said:

http://forums.superherohype.com/showthread.php?t=297798&page=389

Why didn't he say this with all the other savesuperman bashing along with his own shots at Steve in the other posts and threads over there?

Could someone ask him that?

Anonymous said...

I also found derogatory comments against THIS blog on those same SHH forums:

http://forums.superherohype.com/showthread.php?p=16422602#post16422602

This from this 'Nightwing1977':

"~The problem with "Singer's Superman Sucks" blog? Many posters there are hateful, homophobic trash with the gay slurs talk than talking about Superman. ;)"

AP, YOU want to take a crack at this guy? :)

As another plug for savesuperman.com, this FilmNerdJamie may insinuate there are only 20 members, but certainly there are actually more registered, but there does seem to be a CONSISTENT group that actually post, but let's think QUALITY over QUANTITY!

For example, I've posted at the Homopage before, but truthfully, one doesn't often feel welcome there. Why?! Well, if you're a REALIST, you're outnumbered by their 'throbbing' masses of Singerman fans. They have sheer numbers, but like AP says, you have a LOT of illiterate 12-year old 'type' of apologists that whine & then some. It's as annoying as all those freaks at SHH that are ALL THE TIME crying LEDGER & THE DARK KNIGHT!

So you're outnumbered! To give credit where credit is due, there are a FEW apologists over there who will respect your opinion & are basically cool. Steve Wright is ONE of THESE, along with a HANDFUL of others, but MOST are whining, crying, beyotching babies who call you names & insult your intelligence. There's no sense in debating with them because THEY don't see reason, & they'll turn you over to a mod in a heartbeat!

When Emi did her blog, realists began to have something to call their own. Then Steve carried it on with savesuperman.com, & it's been good in that 'like-minded' TRUE fans of Superman can come together & actually have INTELLIGENT conversation about the TRUE Superman. NOT some bandwagon mentality like DUH apologists jumped on with Singerman.

Nuff said!

non_amos

Anonymous said...

Sorry if I offend anyone with this (which I'm sure only apologists would get mad), but....

Why doesn't FilmBitchJamie come to SaveSuperman?? I've been banned from SHH, SHP, and BlueTights for promoting OUR site (its not just mine) and bad mouthing Singer and Routh.

I dare someone, ANYONE, to prove I've been wrong about Singer and MOS thus far. Can't be done. Emi and I have been dead on from day one with Singer being out. He even admitted himself at the Valkyrie premiere after party he has "no commitment" to another Superman or any film beyond Valkyrie. What happened to that iron clad pay or play contract Showtime and Terminal kept talking about? It didn't exist and WE are the ONLY ones who never backed down from that.

And didn't Terminal say it was secretly already in filming last July?? What happened there?? WE said he was full of shit and who was right?? US!! That's who.

WE have been talking reboot and WB being unhappy with SR since the VERY BEGINNING. Robinov comes out and admits we were right, but somehow we STILL get bashed and called fakes?? I know, I know...the truth hurts and you need to make yourselves feel better. But at some point you have to come back down to Earth and realize you can whine and moan about loving SR and Singer all you want but it won't do you any good.

The fight is coming back in just over a week and expect RUTHLESS AGGRESSION on my part. No more sitting back and hoping to reunite the fan base. In my opinion, the TRUE fan base IS united. There are SUPERMAN fans and Singerman fans. It's time to clean out the fake so-called fans who openly say they "became" fans of Superman because of SR. It's time to take out the trash!!

Steve "Archangel" Manning
steve@savesuperman.com

theCOLORSblend said...

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/40084

If this is true and if they stick to the comics, I am SO there.

Steve Wright said...

Steve, you were banned from the Homepage? I didn't know that.

Anonymous said...

There were a lot of people banned from the Homepage.....who have now been proved correct.

The sets in storage, ready to go for the sequel was a LIE perpetuated again and again by Younis. MOS being given the greenlight by that "Free Enterprise" guy was another. And don't forget the infamous casting call scam.

Wrighty, you should ban Younis and Bailey for talking bullshit and misleading people.

Father Finian Egan

Anonymous said...

...let me guess...Brandon Ruth for Singer's "Logan's Run"?

Naah, even Singer realises he needs a hit so a nobody like Ruth won't cut it.

No more Singer. No more Ruth. A reboot for Superman. Sounds like it'll be a good day.

Father Finian Egan.

theCOLORSblend said...

Even Showboat or Showbiz or whateverthehell his name is at SHH is jumping on this bandwagon.

http://forums.superherohype.com/showpost.php?p=11381012&postcount=387

Anonymous said...

The Wachowskis turned in an idea for Superman last year along with a dozen other people but it was rejected along with the others. This is actually old news that was discussed on our boards at one time during the Mark Millar deal. Millar's trilogy was much better from what several people have said, yet even it needed to be reworked. The Wachowskis idea seemed to be like a Tim Burton throwback film with bits of Star Trek according to a few people.

The 2010 and 2011 "comic" film slate from WB should be announced VERY soon. We'll have at least two go into filming by May.

As for Singer, this is old news too. We've all known he was off the project because I've said repeatedly he didn't have a contract. I guess because I don't write entire articles (seeing as how I'm not a reporter), it's why I don't get the proper credit. Oh well....apologists, kiss my ass!

Steve "Archangel" Manning
steve@savesuperman.com

Anonymous said...

Huh? It says he posted that about a year ago.

Browsing through the forums it seems the news that the W Brothers may takeover has gone over pretty well. That and the fact that not many are mourning the loss of Singer anymore.

The tide has turned.....and look at Ruth on the cover of The Advocate. Hairstyle backwards. Singer, what a hack

Father Finian Egan

Anonymous said...

Steve, Manning, that is. You were banned from the Homopage? And Steve Wright didn't KNOW it? How is that possible?

Let me guess. Were you banned by 'the Felcher'? Or Eunuch? ;)

Anonymous said...

Don't know who I was banned by. Just that a week or so after starting SaveSuperman, I went on SHH, SHP, BlueTights, and Kevin Smith's blog. I got banned by all except Smiths. BlueTights banned me twice in 3 days.

And I just LOVE how Showtime is saying Superman is a reboot and he'll most certainly be praised by the sheep as the all powerful insider he thinks he is. Way to be TWO YEARS late with the news there buddy!!

Steve "Archangel" Manning
steve@savesuperman.com

theCOLORSblend said...

Just checked out the Younis page and look what our old buddy wrote.

"They took "Speed Racer" too darn seriously and forgot it was supposed to be for kids"
- Terminal

The two of you who've seen Speed Racer are probably laughing right now.

theCOLORSblend said...

"And I just LOVE how Showtime is saying Superman is a reboot and he'll most certainly be praised by the sheep as the all powerful insider he thinks he is. Way to be TWO YEARS late with the news there buddy!!"

To be fair, that was dated some time ago. I posted it kinda tongue in cheek.

Anonymous said...

"The two of you who've seen Speed Racer are probably laughing right now."

I haven't seen it, but I'm still laughing. Although I keep getting told to check it out on Blu-Ray though. Especially stoned....not that I'd ever do that.....

Father Finian Egan

Anonymous said...

Funny though, I thought Terminal had passed away from an overdose of heterosexuality on Smallville.

The recent Lana suckfest must've revived him.

Father Finian Egan

Anonymous said...

"Don't know who I was banned by. Just that a week or so after starting SaveSuperman, I went on SHH, SHP, BlueTights, and Kevin Smith's blog. I got banned by all except Smiths. BlueTights banned me twice in 3 days."

You see, Steve, you had a DIFFERENT opinion from them, so they censored you basically.

The problem with a lot of THOSE forums is that they're a continual 'circle-jerk' of all things Singer AND BJ Routhman. Giving head & packing fudge indeed!

And see what happened when you tried to promote your REALIST site? You were expelled without an explanation. Why?! Because you don't 'goose-step' to their apologist mantra. Yeah, freedom of speech, sure!

Just bring back savesuperman.com. Please?! I wanna see duh apologists come out of the woodwork on YOUR site, trying to stir up trouble. Just take care of THEM like they do you.

non_amos

theCOLORSblend said...

"You see, Steve, you had a DIFFERENT opinion from them, so they censored you basically."
Protecting the Younis page sponsors, more like. The Younis page is an outlet for, among other things, Singerman merchandise. If Younis's handlers found out that were people were belittling Singerman, Singer, Routh, etc, on the forums and comments and stuff they might not be very happy with Stevie boy. That's what Younis thinks anyway. The reality is that probably nobody from Singer's camp has come to his website in forever and have long since forgotten his name.

Steve Wright said...

Steve actually doesn't pay attention to the forums. He leaves the other mods and myself to watch over them, unless somebody emails him about something.

Sucks that you were banned Steve. I was wondering why I hadn't seen you post since you first came on the site.

Anonymous said...

"Steve actually doesn't pay attention to the forums. He leaves the other mods and myself to watch over them, unless somebody emails him about something."

And just WHO ARE the mods there now? Certainly not Terminal, no? He needs to be banned just for wasting space. ;)

Anonymous said...

"The fight is coming back in just over a week and expect RUTHLESS AGGRESSION on my part. No more sitting back and hoping to reunite the fan base. In my opinion, the TRUE fan base IS united. There are SUPERMAN fans and Singerman fans. It's time to clean out the fake so-called fans who openly say they "became" fans of Superman because of SR. It's time to take out the trash!!"



Jesus Christ, man, get over yourself. Aren't you taking yourself way too seriously? What a fucking nerd. Get a life there buddy. So, how's the monkey business doing nowadays? Is it paying your bills? How about your superman trilogy? Couldn't even get a meeting there, huh? You and your Arnold-Terminator-Governator Superman pick. You are a damn joke, buddy. And all your teenage followers. Yes, you might have some connection in Hollywood. It doesn't change the fact that your a damn loser who thinks he can save superman. You probably think you had something to do with Bryan Singer getting fired, huh? Yeah, that's truly pathetic. I'll repeat myself -- take your wife out and breathe some fresh air. All your gay bashing is your way of showing that you, my buddy, are a closeted cock sucker. Peace out.

Anonymous said...

Hey, Steve, AP, all you guys, LOOK! This poster MUST BE FilmFagJamie! What's the dead giveaway? He's asking Steve how the 'monkey business' is doing. I seem to recall on those links that I posted that he referred to Steve's monkeys when trying to tear down Steve.

But Steve, he didn't have the balls to sign his name! What a joke himself!

non_amos

Anonymous said...

Hi Jamie!!

Why would I think SaveSuperman had anything to do with Singer being fired?? It happened in Dec 2006 and we didn't go online until March 2008. Emijayne (my sexy wife) announced it on CountingDown that he was done and moving on to new projects and was the first to do so.

So sorry it's taken this long for the truth to come out, but now that Singer has admitted he has no commitment to Superman and WB supposedly is looking at the Wachowskis with a WHOLE NEW CAST, can't we all just get along?? Just kidding. I'm gonna enjoy every minute of right while you apologist idiots continue to believe Singer and Routh are coming back.

Steve "Archangel" Manning
steve@savesuperman.com

Anonymous said...

FilmFagJamie, giving head & packing fudge.

ApologistPuncher said...

"You are a damn joke, buddy. And all your teenage followers."

Aww, come HERE trying to start shit, and STILL admit we are SUPERIOR to you little queens. *Psst* Teenagers are older than 12 year olds..... Asshole.


See how this little fancy-boy throws a LAME tantrum here, reminiscent of other losers like REtard and AntoBlueNuts? The FACT that there will be no more SIngerman OR BJ Routh is KILLING THEM. Jesus, can't even talk shit like a MAN.

Hey, FilmFagJamie, still upset about Prop. 8 passing in Cali? Did your "domestic partner" NightWhackOff1977 tell you he was going to give you "such a pinch" for not marrying him the day you were able?? Which one of you don's the fetish-wetsuit, and the other a bald-cap, to re-enact Lex Lamer "shanking" Singerman from behind?

You fucking Apologists. Not only are you pathetic, but stupid to boot.

Anonymous said...

Even though I disagree with Steve on many points, i believe he has the right, as we all do, to freely express his opinions. I do believe Steve and his web site would be given more serious consideration by WB and others were he to focus more on Superman and leave the gay, not gay and politics out.
That being said Steve has just as much right, as any american, to express his opinion!

Clark El

Anonymous said...

One major problem, that is not being discussed often, with any future Superman film is the lawsuit from Jerry Seigels heirs. Until this is settled, there will not be forward movement with any new Superman movie. And if you think this will be settled anytime soon, you may want to think again. The Seigels allege the deals between DC and Warner Brothers do not represent fair market value. They claim, because of the close corporate relationship between the two companies DC received substantially less than an unrelated company would have paid which could affect the amount the Siegels might receive from the apportionment of profits derived from their copyright interest in Superman. Remeber, the Seigels have already been awarded over $200 million dollars from the profits of Superman Returns.

Anonymous said...

shut up Clarkel, go back to BT where we all know your from.

and the next lame post, I didn't know SR even turned a profit let alone 200 mill being a portion of profits????

Anonymous said...

No I won't shut up Anonymous Loser! And I am not from BT and have never posted there. Again, this is one of the main problems with SaveSuperman.com.
If someone does not agree with you 100 percent then you attack.
Also, steve posted that SaveSuperman.com would be back in just over a week and it is still not back. What's up with that?

Clark El

Anonymous said...

Superman Returns turned a profit and half has been awarded to the Seigels. Maybe if you should spent a little more time in the real world reading real articles instead of sniffing Steve's butt you may know this!
There is also the upcoming matter of Joe Shuster's heir claiming the other half of the rights to Superman. If he wins then DC and Warners will no longer have any rights to Superman as the Seigels have been awarded 50 percent of the rights to Superman.
This also brings up the Superboy case which the Seigels say belongs to them as well. Warners is claiming Smallville is not the Superboy character created by Seigel and as we have all seen, they have gone out of their way to get Smallville as far off track as possible, when it comes to the story line. This is why I believe we will never see Tom Welling in the Superman costume because Warners would be admitting that Superboy and Superman are one in the same, and the Seigels would win their case.

Anonymous said...

In the pending cases, Toberoff(Seigels' attorney) is taking a different tack, asserting that the Siegel family has terminated the grants to the Superman and Superboy copyrights that Jerry Siegel had bestowed in 1938 and 1948, respectively. The Siegels have exercised a clause in U.S. copyright law that gives creators or their heirs a five-year window to reclaim rights to their works 56 years after the copyright was issued. Toberoff says this entitles the Siegels to half of all Superman-related profits earned since the copyright termination took effect in 1999—a sum he estimates tops $50 million—as well as any future profits. He also asserts that Time Warner has infringed the Siegels’ Superboy copyright with its Smallville TV series and thus owes unspecified damages.

Time Warner’s lawyers dispute these claims, saying, among other things,that Smallville's hero never dons the famous costume thus he is not the Superman/Superboy character created by Seigel and that the Siegel heirs have reneged on a settlement hammered out before Toberoff entered the picture. The attorneys also question whether the termination papers were filed correctly and say that, even if they were, the Siegel family has vastly overstated how much it is owed.

At stake is not just money but, potentially, the very future of the franchise. If the Siegel heirs prevail in winning back their copyrights, the result could be a similar challenge by the heirs of Superman’s co-creator, artist Joe Shuster. And if that challenge were successful, then Time Warner which was developing a follow-up to last year’s film Superman Returns could eventually find itself out of the Superman business altogether. How big is that business? Only Time Warner knows for sure (and it isn’t saying), but counting the Superman- and Superboy-related movies, TV shows, DVDs, books, comics, and merchandise, the conservative estimate says it’s $1 billion.

Anonymous said...

On a side note: Toberoff's estimate of $50 million dollars applies only to the profits DC Comics has made since 1999. $200 million has already been awarded from Warner's profits of Superman Returns.

ApologistPuncher said...

" Again, this is one of the main problems with SaveSuperman.com.
If someone does not agree with you 100 percent then you attack."


This AIN'T SaveSuperman.com, genius.

Singerman Peeps DIDN'T make "$200 million dollars profit", idiot. How about you "link" us to the court documents stating this little turd-nugget of yours?

And DON'T put up links to SingerHomoHype or the SingermanHomoPage as "proof" either. They are about as reliable as a deadbeat-dad.

HA.

Anonymous said...

Thank you AP

Anonymous said...

a portion of SR's profits were 200 mill. LOL Jesus, why do the Apologists reach fro straws so much???? They actually still think this movie made money???

ApologistPuncher said...

"They actually still think this movie made money???"

Apologists do not "think".

This is a time-proven fact.

Anonymous said...

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/29/business/media/29comics.html?_r=1&oref=login

Here is the link. Just to fill you in Apologistcuffer. Superman Returns took in just over $200 million at the domestic box office. Combined with DVD and merchandising products(toys, costumes, hats, t shirts etc...) there has been another $200 million in profit for Warner/DC from Superman Returns. I know this is too complicated for you to understand(simple math) but those are the facts. Just keep cuffing your apologist!

Anonymous said...

Apologistcuffer, Auperman Returns took in another $220 million worlwide. So that is $420 million at the box office and $200 million in merchandising. I doubt, even with the addition of all the starting and stopping of Superman movies for over a decade, that the costs would be more than $420 million, let alone 620 million.
Good one Anonymous!
"Apologistcuffer"
"Keep cuffing yor apologist"
LMAO,

Kryptonian

Anonymous said...

ApologistPuncher said...
" Again, this is one of the main problems with SaveSuperman.com.
If someone does not agree with you 100 percent then you attack."

This AIN'T SaveSuperman.com, genius.

No it isn't because it has been SHUT DOWN!!!!!!!

LMAO,

Kryptonian

Anonymous said...

The War Cry is Far from Over- - -

Just like apologistcuffer's tears!


LMAO,

Kryptonian

Anonymous said...

Paraphrasing Lex Luthor in Superman Retuns.

So long SaveSuperman.com!


LMAO,

Kryptonian

ApologistPuncher said...

Ohhh, isn't this CUTE! An Apologist fuckwit is TALKING TO HIMSELF! Must be hard being lonely....

But for the rest of us who can read & comprehend, here's the part this fucking Apologist fag is going on about:

"Also to be resolved is whether the heirs are entitled to payments directly from Time Warner’s film unit, Warner Brothers, which took in $200 million at the domestic box office with “Superman Returns” in 2006, or only from the DC unit’s Superman profits."

Now, does that say WB made $200 million PROFIT, or that was it's ENTIRE DOMESTIC TAKE? This REtard actually "thought" he had a POINT. Instead, he looks like a fucking dufus now. "da hairs r gunna gets 200 trilion bajilion kafilion dollas cuz da swooperman peeps was da bestest moofie eva!!!!"

Can you believe we STILL have idiot Apologists who don't understand finances, or how HollyWeird works? He reads an article and starts making shit up. Fucking pathetic.

Hey Kraptonguian, do you pimp-slap your "life-partner" when he doesn't clip his nails? It must be hard getting a handjob with all those nasty hangnails and whatnot.

Must look funny though, watching you slap the shit out of your own limp-wristed hand......

Anonymous said...

Apologistcuffer,
Where is that SaveSuperman web site?

LMAO,

Kryptonian

Anonymous said...

The War Cry is Far from Over- - -


LMAO,

Kryptonian

The Star Treker said...

Gosh, will this fight ever end. No offense but both of you are being pathetic and being really childish which I mean both sides of the Superman fandom. Look at your selves, you all are acting like little children over a movie that was out 3 years ago. Get the freaking over it already! The Star Trek fandom gets along better than you guys do. Even a lot of them don't agree with fans that liked Enterprise the latest Trek series but they don't fight over it though. This fight really needs to stop and it's driving me nuts. I'm a better Superman fan than all of you because I don't fight over something I don't agree with. I just let it go and I move on. I'm already sick and tired of all this crap on SR, Bryan Singer, BJ Routh, Tom Welling, gay bashing , and so on. I want them to take Superman to a totally different direction that has nothing to do with Donner or Singer take on Superman or even Smallville period. I want something new and fresh that they never have done with Superman before and of course I want it to be really faithful to the source material. Oh have a nice day childish Superman fans. *rolleyes*

ApologistPuncher said...

Let's add to this little bitch's EPIC FAILURE at the internets.

From Kraptonguian:

"Apologistcuffer, Auperman Returns took in another $220 million worlwide. So that is $420 million at the box office and $200 million in merchandising. I doubt, even with the addition of all the starting and stopping of Superman movies for over a decade, that the costs would be more than $420 million, let alone 620 million."

NOW, from the article this asshair posted HIMSELF:

"The ruling left intact Time Warner’s international rights to the character, which it has long owned through its DC Comics unit."

Apologists. Sucking dick and providing new lows in stupidity since 2006!

ApologistPuncher said...

Hey, TheStarTrekerWhoIsFuckingApologistClownShoes,

Eat a dick you whiney little fuck. Mommy held you too much as a kid, that's YOUR problem.

The Star Treker said...

Hey, Apologist Puncher The Apologist Wise Guy Nerd. You need to fucking grow up and learn how to be mature and stop calling people ridiculous and pathetic names. You think I'm whining and think I'm a somewhat apologist clown. Give me a fucking break when you don't really know you are an apologist yourself. You all on both ends are fucking apologists and fucking whiney fanboys period. End of discussion.

Anonymous said...

CAN'T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG?!

Rodney King

ApologistPuncher said...

"Hey, Apologist Puncher The Apologist Wise Guy Nerd. You need to fucking grow up and learn how to be mature and stop calling people ridiculous and pathetic names. You think I'm whining and think I'm a somewhat apologist clown. Give me a fucking break when you don't really know you are an apologist yourself. You all on both ends are fucking apologists and fucking whiney fanboys period. End of discussion."

Awww, the little boy wants to try to talk shit like a MAN. And guess what?? He STILL whines like a bitch with a skinned-knee!

"i knows u is but wat isz me??"

Can you believe a virgin LOSER who names himself "The Star Treker", and makes these fucking RETARDED videos about himself, is calling OTHERS "fanboys"?? The downright autism-like audacity of this little prick!

Want to know why I knew this little cunt-rag's mom held him too much? Well, besides the whiney, testosterone-free/estrogen-filled "life" he leads?

I was fucking her in the ass with a plunger most of the times she did.

The Star Treker said...

No dude you are the one is the biggest virgin nerd LOSER ever and a douche-bag and a fucking asshole that goes major apeshit over fans that likes SR or anything that is related to it that doesn't know shit about me whatsoever. You need to get a fucking life seriously, Mr. Little Prick/Smartass/Jackass.

ApologistPuncher said...

"No dude you are the one is the biggest virgin nerd LOSER ever and a douche-bag and a fucking asshole that goes major apeshit over fans that likes SR or anything that is related to it that doesn't know shit about me whatsoever."

Awww, now he's "recycling" MY insults. Never seen an Apologist do THAT before...

I know plenty about you, you fucking illiterate piece of dogshit. Think people want to see your fucking JUVENILE videos on YouTube? Besides Daddy and whore-Mommy? Think again, you ignorant sap.

You wearing your "Star Trek" outfit to work at WalMart AGAIN this year, stud? Gonna gets ALL the ladyboys dressed like THAT, killer!

The Star Treker said...

Because I'm not an Apologist you idiot. I'm not defending the latest Superman film or anyone or taking sides whatsoever.

You still don't know shit about me, my videos proves nothing. Anyways I deleted like most of my videos. They weren't about myself, most of them were fan edited videos with Star Trek, Batman Begins, TDK, Batman: TAS, Superman: TAS, Justice League Unlimited, or Smallville footage in them but I had no choice to delete them because I was getting too many claims on them. Those videos about myself are pretty old except the ones that say Treker's Adventures on them are new. You probably didn't know this but I made a video ad for SaveSuperman.com a while back which it was more really a tribute than an ad. Oh I don't work at Wal-Mart. I work at the other store with the Big K.

See you don't know shit about me. You are the one is an arrogant and ignorant sap. Oh you are also some punk and a loser. So I'm done with you.

I hope SaveSuperman.com come back soon because I'm really getting sick and tired this flaming and personal attacking blog with haters and defenders grabbing their throats on each other and I'm like in the middle of it too.

Anonymous said...

The Star Treker, you should probably know by now that ApologistPuncher always resorts to name calling and such because he is not intelligent enough to engage in a real conversation. He certainly is as annoying as the true apologists. Just typing this out I can easily imagine his reply. You just have to chuckle at his almost incomprehensable posts. You cannot carry on a conversation with him because of it...of course, I must be an apologist for stating the obvious. (rolls eyes)

The Star Treker said...

You are exactly right. There is no way I can get through him anyways. He is just a prick wall. All I was doing just trying stop this fight between haters and defenders because it is just really tiresome, childish, and ridiculous.

ApologistPuncher said...

"The Star Treker, you should probably know by now that ApologistPuncher always resorts to name calling and such because he is not intelligent enough to engage in a real conversation. He certainly is as annoying as the true apologists. Just typing this out I can easily imagine his reply. You just have to chuckle at his almost incomprehensable posts. You cannot carry on a conversation with him because of it...of course, I must be an apologist for stating the obvious. (rolls eyes)"

Anyone here not see that this is TheStarTrekerWhoIsFuckingApologistClownShoes talking to HIMSELF? Just take a look at the "rolls eyes" GAY comment he made as BOTH "personas", as well as the run-on sentences and INCOMPREHENSIBLE gobbledy-gook he spouts. Fucking sad, isn't it?

Anyway Michael, I don't know "anything" about you, huh? Oh, did I just call you by your FIRST NAME?? I knew you worked in that HIGHLY DESIRABLE field of "retail", that you make shitty videos on YouTube, and that you like to dress-up in Star Trek and Singerman outfits on Halloween. But you're right, I know NOTHING about you, except that you live in California too.

Oh, and as to his little comment that follows:

"All I was doing just trying stop this fight between haters and defenders because it is just really tiresome, childish, and ridiculous."

Let me remind you what this piece of shit said earlier:

"I'm a better Superman fan than all of you because I don't fight over something I don't agree with."

When SaveSuperman.com comes back up, I am going to RIDE this little fuckwit until he runs away with his thumbtack between his legs. Fucking Apologist colostomy bag.

Anonymous said...

Superman Returns made enough to award the Siegel family $200mil?? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Someone failed economics...

1. Box Office was $391mil worldwide.
2. Budget was $270mil including the $40mil or so from previous plans.
3. Marketing costs were $107mil.

$377mil in expenses vs $391mil in receipts minus roughly 48.8% to pay the theaters that showed the film equals a theatrical loss of $177mil. After DVD sales/rentals, WB broke even and Legendary suffered a total loss of just over $50mil because of how the partnership was worked out prior to filming.

So where is this $200mil "cut" of the profits from SR??? It's in your silly little apologist imagination....

As for us, we decided while the site is offline to do some needed upgrades, clean up the forums, and come back stronger rather than just being the same. We'll have a whole new look and a whole new attitude.

Steve "Archangel" Manning
steve@savesuperman.com

The Star Treker said...

This Apologist Puncher is just a moron. He doesn't even know where in the heck I live. I live in the east coast not in California and I work at Kmart not Wal-Mart you dickhead. Don't even get me start with the costume insults. I don't care if you make fun of my videos. Dude you are just a piece of shit, you are just nothing to me. You are just one big joke that has nothing else to do and just loves to insult people and you are definitely not even intelligent enough to engage in a real conversation like that anonymous person said. If anything that you will say to me on SaveSuperman.com won't work on me or will scare me off either when it comes back and I'm going to ignore you if you are ever on there anyways. Oh I was not that anonymous that posted that comment either.

Btw, I'm not a SR hater or defender/apologist. I having a SR outfit doesn't make me a defender/apologist either and it was the only outfit I could found that I liked that was a lot better than the really shitty ones that you buy at the store anyways. Get that into your arrogant and ignorant skull. I'm just a Superman fan that is relax, casual, and optimistic about any incarnation of Superman that he sees is good, decent, or half decent. He is not a hardcore fan that really despise/hates it because it isn't completely faithful to the source material and goes apeshit and attacks the people that likes it and he is not a fan/Apologist (which you do like calling them that) is going to defend it with all cause and attacks back. So bug off, you little 2-year old.

The Star Treker said...

"Superman Returns made enough to award the Siegel family $200mil?? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Someone failed economics...

1. Box Office was $391mil worldwide.
2. Budget was $270mil including the $40mil or so from previous plans.
3. Marketing costs were $107mil.

$377mil in expenses vs $391mil in receipts minus roughly 48.8% to pay the theaters that showed the film equals a theatrical loss of $177mil. After DVD sales/rentals, WB broke even and Legendary suffered a total loss of just over $50mil because of how the partnership was worked out prior to filming.

So where is this $200mil "cut" of the profits from SR??? It's in your silly little apologist imagination...."


That is about right what it shows on Box Office Mojo.

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=superman06.htm

"As for us, we decided while the site is offline to do some needed upgrades, clean up the forums, and come back stronger rather than just being the same. We'll have a whole new look and a whole new attitude.

Steve "Archangel" Manning"


That is great news and I can't wait to see the new look but does it mean all our past threads and posts will all be deleted? If true, darn it, I wanted to see if someone reply to my last post that I did on the Smallville Season 8 thread before the site went down weeks ago but oh well. I'm still looking forward get back on there with its new look and new attitude. Just let us know when you get it ready and running again. :)

theCOLORSblend said...

I think the reality of this situation is that the Apologists are used to having mods cover for them while they snipe at Realists and expect the same treatment here. Everybody knows this blog and the comments are unmoderated. Everybody knows that this blog is about as anti-Singerman as is possible to get. Everybody knows that at least 99.999% of us want a reboot.

If you're dumb enough to spout absurd and long-debunked Apologist talking points here, you deserve whatever you get.

ApologistPuncher said...

Can't you just see this Apologist piece of shit getting all "red in the face" while he posts his nonsensical "rants" about me? I know in his "mind" what he posts is some SCATHING attack on me, when in reality it's like reading the ravings of an 11 year old with Downs Syndrome.

But like ALL true Apologists, in this kid's head HE "won". He showed ME, didn't he?

Bug off? What the FUCK is THAT, moron? Jesus....

ApologistPuncher said...

"That is great news and I can't wait to see the new look but does it mean all our past threads and posts will all be deleted? If true, darn it, I wanted to see if someone reply to my last post that I did on the Smallville Season 8 thread before the site went down weeks ago but oh well. I'm still looking forward get back on there with its new look and new attitude. Just let us know when you get it ready and running again. :)"

Yes Steve, let US know when it comes back up. But don't forget this idiot who can't spell or write out a coherent THOUGHT is an Apologist fuckwit who said the following:

""I'm a better Superman fan than all of you because I don't fight over something I don't agree with."

I'll make sure EVERYONE at SaveSuperman is aware of this asshair. Count on it.

Anonymous said...

In other words, you are starting a whole new website because savesuperman.com has been shut down for good.

You actually thought that WB and DC gave a crap about what you think. LMAO

"So long savesuperman.com".

LMAO,

Kryptonian

Anonymous said...

Apologistcuffer and Steve "Richard Simmons" Mannning, do you two live together in San Francisco?

Kryptonian

ApologistPuncher said...

Hey, I forgot about this penis-puffer! Anyone notice that when I FUCKED HIM UP, he stopped posting his bullshit like the BITCH he is?? Must be rough to have someone turn your OWN links against you, huh?

Don't quote me on this, but I heard Kraptonguian, REtard, and TheStarTrekerWhoIsFuckingApologistClownShoes' mother are all secretly making beastiality/scat films for their fellow Apologist "brood".

That's sick.

ApologistPuncher said...

Oh, just got ANOTHER juicy "tidbit":

It appears that their biggest client is FilmFagJamie!

I heard he wishes he could participate, but can't tear himself away from the SingerHomoHype "boards" long enough to interact with living, breathing human beings.

His mommy doesn't count. THAT fat PIG doesn't "register" as a human being....

Anonymous said...

SaveSuperman.com is alive and well. It was NOT shut down permanently by any means. I'm willing to bet you're part of that FAKE gay rights group "United Federation for Equality and Understanding". Sure we fell for it. Ha Ha on us... But what you did isn't what you set out to do. We shut down at the advice of my attorneys so we could sort things out, but once your BULL SHIT was exposed, you've only been successful at one thing....PISSING ME OFF!!

The web address will be the same. The purpose will be the same. It's been almost a year since we went online so it's simply time for upgrades.

Oh and BTW...No rebuttal on my FACTS about the SR money?? I know the truth hurts sometimes...

Steve "Archangel" Manning
steve@savesuperman.com

ApologistPuncher said...

When reached for comment on SCATIALITYGATE, FilmFagJamie's "life partner" NightWhackOff1977 responded with a *GASP* and a flutter of his limp-wrist.

When pressed for comment, he responded as such:

NightWhackOff1977: "Well I am SHOCKED!! But also intrigued... But MORE shocked! And interested...".

He went on to state he will "get to the bottom" of FilmFagJamie.

Stay tuned to this developing story....

ApologistPuncher said...

More "gruesome details":

It appears TheStarTrekerWhoIsFuckingApologistClownShoes mother, and another SingerHomoHype poster, are making girl/girl (I use that term LOOSELY) scat porn for the "fag hag" contingent of Apologists. The name of the second party? "MostPowerfulVaginaStench"

Working under the title: 2 Fat Girls - 1 BIG FUCKING CUP, these two obese freaks of nature wallow in their own filth, all while wearing "BRB" artificial "pig snouts" on their faces. It truly IS a sight to see, but NOT for the faint hearted. Or human for that matter.

*WRETCH*

More...to...come?

The Star Treker said...

"Yes Steve, let US know when it comes back up. But don't forget this idiot who can't spell or write out a coherent THOUGHT is an Apologist fuckwit who said the following:

"I'm a better Superman fan than all of you because I don't fight over something I don't agree with."

I'll make sure EVERYONE at SaveSuperman is aware of this asshair. Count on it."


"More "gruesome details":

It appears TheStarTrekerWhoIsFuckingApologistClownShoes mother, and another SingerHomoHype poster, are making girl/girl (I use that term LOOSELY) scat porn for the "fag hag" contingent of Apologists. The name of the second party? "MostPowerfulVaginaStench"

Working under the title: 2 Fat Girls - 1 BIG FUCKING CUP, these two obese freaks of nature wallow in their own filth, all while wearing "BRB" artificial "pig snouts" on their faces. It truly IS a sight to see, but NOT for the faint hearted. Or human for that matter.

*WRETCH*

More...to...come?"


Bah bah bah. You sir are the one is really an asshair. You just go ahead keep calling me an Apologist all you want, I don't really care. I don't even really care if you tell everyone on SaveSuperman.com you think I'm a biggest dumbass ever. I'm not going to keep wasting my time on an immature illusional moron and bitch pussy like you. Oh you are going to get slap in the face really hard from someone from one of these days that you won't handle it either. Someone that is worse than what an Apologist or I would throw at you, you will see. Eat that loser.

ApologistPuncher said...

" Oh you are going to get slap in the face really hard from someone from one of these days that you won't handle it either. Someone that is worse than what an Apologist or I would throw at you, you will see. Eat that loser."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Oh, and:

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!

ApologistPuncher said...

Now that my fits of laughter have all but subsided, allow me to retort:

"Bah bah bah. You sir are the one is really an asshair."

Bah bah bah? Uh-oh, we know what HIS mommy was doing when he was conceived!

"You just go ahead keep calling me an Apologist all you want, I don't really care. I don't even really care if you tell everyone on SaveSuperman.com you think I'm a biggest dumbass ever."

I'm going to do MUCH WORSE than THAT, sissy-boy. I am going to blast your retarded ass EVERY. SINGLE. TIME. YOU. POST. Watch and see, fuckwad.

"I'm not going to keep wasting my time on an immature illusional moron and bitch pussy like you."

Illusional? What the fuck stupid?? Did that make "sense" to you??

And you will keep "dancing" for me as long I want you to, Apologist twat.

Anonymous said...

Is English a 2nd language to that guy? SHEESH! Quote:

"Oh you are going to get slap in the face really hard from someone from one of these days that you won't handle it either."

Please refer to first question?!

Anonymous said...

Well let me get in on this.

Here I come in here just to see what everyone has to say. About stuff I like, and just the thought of running across a small little pencil-dick like ApologistPunch...
I know some people can talk shit, but hell man. I think this pecker-lent takes the cake of how dumb someone can make themself really look,Just because you don't like someone's thought doesn't mean you should open your shit smelling mouth and let everyone smell it. Hell diden't your mommy,or granny teach you better.Or did you just grow up with some asses that had no manners. Eather way Lay off of people. Hell try to be a bigger man and let it go. Hell my father tought me respect for others what did your father teach you?????????
It sure as hell wasen't respect for others..
My point is to the point grow some real balls quit acting like a man and be one.
Hell maby if you ask real nice like, The Star Treker might tell you how to be a real man. I have been reading this book and you remind me of someone who is in it ( A SQUAW )( OR MABY A PAPOOSE)which ever one you like to call yourself. And if none of those fit you maby you should change your name to ApopogistPuss.

ApologistPuncher said...

Now tell me this ISN'T TheStarTrekerWhoIsFuckingApologistClownShoes posting as "Anonymous"??

As someone said earlier:

"Is English a 2nd language to that guy? SHEESH!"

"u ar da dumpest stoopid but faze loozer how will get a slap from one day from worse than i or apologist were to slap u in da face"

ApologistPuncher said...

"My point is to the point grow some real balls quit acting like a man and be one."

Another "witty" GEM from an illiterate Apologist testicle!

Keep 'em comin' kids!

The Star Treker said...

Apologist Puncher still hasn't learned how to grow up and to be mature. Which to be a real man like to stop attacking a guy that doesn't really have the fuck about Singerman Returns (which all haters like calling it that) anymore and wants a reboot, a new director, a new cast, and a totally different direction about the same way that Steve, Emily, and everyone else from SaveSuperman.com wants.

Do you know why Treker doesn't really gives the fuck about Singerman Returns anymore? Because his views of it have changed from since he saw it at the theater and bought it on DVD. He doesn't like it that much anymore like he used to. His new thoughts of it now are it wasn't terrible but just not great and not good enough to deserve a sequel, it was just meant to be a standalone film. He realize that Singer just made it too much like the original films and it felt like watching X-Men or X2 which they all dragged and not enough action or story in them either. He is glad Singer isn't contract to make a sequel. Singer isn't really cut to direct any comic book films at all anyways.

Oh Apologist Puncher is so delusional that he thinks that Treker started posting as an anonymous. Btw, Treker meant to say you Apologist Puncher is an immature delusional (not illusional) moron and a bitch pussy and going to get slap around really hard. Treker just worded it wrong. His grammar isn't perfect you know.

Anonymous said...

AP, really got a kick out of this:

"Which to be a real man like to stop attacking a guy that doesn't really have the fuck about Singerman Returns"

HUH?!

"Do you know why Treker doesn't really gives the fuck about Singerman Returns anymore?"

HUH?! (again)

He then talks about himself in the 3rd person continually.

"His grammar isn't perfect you know."

Gee, you don't say?! :)

The Star Treker said...

"AP, really got a kick out of this:

"Which to be a real man like to stop attacking a guy that doesn't really have the fuck about Singerman Returns"

HUH?!

"Do you know why Treker doesn't really gives the fuck about Singerman Returns anymore?"

HUH?! (again)

He then talks about himself in the 3rd person continually.

"His grammar isn't perfect you know."

Gee, you don't say?! :)"


Who in the hell are you that obviously supports the delusional childish moron AP and that wants to make fun of me?

Anonymous said...

"Just because you don't like someone's thought doesn't mean you should open your shit smelling mouth and let everyone smell it. "

I see Neal Bailey is still smarting about the "bad breath" comments.

Father Finian Egan

....how many personalities does "Star Treker" have?? None of them can construct a sentence though.

ApologistPuncher said...

The wheels keep coming off the short bus, don't they??

"Oh Apologist Puncher is so delusional that he thinks that Treker started posting as an anonymous. Btw, Treker meant to say you Apologist Puncher is an immature delusional (not illusional) moron and a bitch pussy and going to get slap around really hard."

Jesus, this kid needs to head back to his Dungeons & Dragons computer game, or whatever the fuck he plays, before he hurts himself "thinking" too hard. This is one fucked-up REtard.

"da Treker want to say to tell to you by speak at you wit bitch pussy asshole. sum 1 be slap you face an hard slap for slap your slap. da Treker dont fuck Singerman who care da reboot!!"

"....how many personalities does "Star Treker" have?? None of them can construct a sentence though."

When your job is to wear a helmet while you "fetch" carts at a "Big K-Mart", and you spend all day making lame YouTube videos in-between "battling" goblins and Klingons while wearing a Star Trek uniform with a Singerman cape, you don't REALLY have time for things like SCHOOL or "fancy book-learnin'". I mean, a motherfucker has to have PRIORITIES, right?

Or, "maybe" he's just stupid....

The Star Treker said...

"Just because you don't like someone's thought doesn't mean you should open your shit smelling mouth and let everyone smell it. "

I see Neal Bailey is still smarting about the "bad breath" comments.

Father Finian Egan

....how many personalities does "Star Treker" have?? None of them can construct a sentence though."


That is not Neal Bailey made that comment because I know who it is and no it is not me. Oh and no I don't have different personalities just one. Sometimes my sentences don't always come out right and I just decide to speak in 3rd person just to be sarcastic.

The Star Treker said...

Apologist Puncher is the one is a fucked-up retard and stupid and loves to make fun of people for no reason. AP you don't have any clue what I do at work or on my free time whatsoever.

Anonymous said...

"That is not Neal Bailey made that comment because I know who it is and no it is not me." Star TreKKer

You know, I didn't think it was really Neal Bailey either......FilmfagJamie perhaps?? Because it looks like the loony ravings of that apologist idiot. You suck up to that goose over there, don't you?

Nice to see you getting your mates to defend you on here though. But honestly, give it up son. It's pointless and you're rapidly losing any cred you had back at SaveSuperman.

"I just let it go and I move on"
Star TreKKer, about a thousand posts ago.

Let it go and, more importantly, MOVE ON ALREADY!

Father Finian Egan

The Star Treker said...

Father Finian Egan

No it's a friend of mine. I told him about this blog and tell him about AP how a big asshole he is. He is no idiot or an apologist at all. I quit replying on Superhero Hype a while ago. I actually have been discussing about this blog Singer's Superman Sucks: Freedom Of Speech Under Attack and other stuff on CountingDown.com.

http://www.countingdown.com/movies/3552958/board?viewpost=4068203&start=

I'm sorry for all that like AP. I just don't like him period and I just can't really tolerate him anymore. He is just a lot worse than those Superman Returns apologists. All this crap between me and him is getting way too ridiculous and really getting out of hand. What he says next time I don't really care because I'm ending it now and before I cause a lot more damage or completely lose all my credibility that I had on SaveSuperman.com which you are right.

If I see AP on there I will just totally ignore him like I said earlier. So see you all on SaveSuperman.com when it comes back online. Meanwhile I will just continue posting on CountingDown.com where it is more civilize than here and those websites that has Superman Returns apologists.

Anonymous said...

From blog Christianity:

Remember that recent rumour about the Wachowski brothers being asked to reboot the Superman series? It's been debunked. And the same website that debunked it is now reporting that a password-protected page at the Legendary Pictures website indicates the next Superman movie will be a sequel to Superman Returns (2006) called Superman Unleashed.

Here is the link:
http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctmovies/2009/02/newsbites-the-comics-and-super.html


LMAO,

Kryptonian

Anonymous said...

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/superman_movies/news/?a=6343


Here is another artcle about the sequel!

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a319/mgrabois/LSH_show/season2/LOSH_TwoSup_02.jpg


LMAO at Apologistcuffer and Steve "Richard Simmons" Manning,

Kryptonian

Anonymous said...

And yet another article for Apologistcuffer and his "Best Friend" Steve.

http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/02/20/exclusive-superman-returns-sequel-to-be-titled-superman-unleashed/

LMAO,

Kryptonian

ApologistPuncher said...

You would think a little fairy who got his ASS KICKED TWICE NOW, would know when to shut his fucking mouth.

Then again, he IS an Apologist. Since when did these peter-puffers have "brains"?

ApologistPuncher said...

"No it's a friend of mine. I told him about this blog and tell him about AP how a big asshole he is. He is no idiot or an apologist at all. I quit replying on Superhero Hype a while ago. I actually have been discussing about this blog Singer's Superman Sucks: Freedom Of Speech Under Attack and other stuff on CountingDown.com."

We don't want to talk "big assholes", now do we anus-boy? And since that was MY article, you like me more than you are letting on. Don't you, moron?

"If I see AP on there I will just totally ignore him like I said earlier. So see you all on SaveSuperman.com when it comes back online. Meanwhile I will just continue posting on CountingDown.com where it is more civilize than here and those websites that has Superman Returns apologists."

Oh, you WILL see me on there, douche-nozzle. I'll bne the guy slamming your Apologist ass every time you post. I kept your little "gem" about being a "better Superman fan" than the rest of us, and will trot it out when you open your retarded mouth over there.

Fucking Apologist dipshit.

Anonymous said...

Yeah...Singerman sequel...cause "slashfilm" says so. They are none for breaking many movie stories like................

....hear the crickets chirping?


...yeah exactly...

Try again when you have something real.

Storm 55

Anonymous said...

Singerman, giving head & packing fudge.

Anonymous said...

"Here is the link:
http://blog.christianitytoday.com......

LMAO!

Kryptonian"

But that's not gospel though, is it....

Jesus Christ, what idiot takes their movie news from Christianity Today??

Father Finian Egan

theCOLORSblend said...

"http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctmovies/2009/02/newsbites-the-comics-and-super.html"
For starters, it's funny to me how the Apologists dismiss Variety blogs for being, y'know, blogs. For a respected industry trade but... a blog.

Whatever.

So then this nimrod turns around and not only asserts a non-Variety blog as being unassailable (cuz, hey, we all know if it's on the iNtarweb, it must be true) but also failing to recognize that it does nothing, NOTHING, except point back to and repeat Slashfilm. The implication here is obvious for most but I shall spell it out for those of you with an IQ below 50. That's not "corroboration", that's just repeating the same old line of BS.

Will the Wachowskis direct a rebooted Superman? Maybe, maybe not. However, WB has had every golden opportunity to make a Singerman sequel since Singerman opened up in theaters. Which is going on three years ago. They haven't done it before when the film could still sorta be called "fresh in the public imagination". Why would they do it when the movie itself has fallen even further off the radar and with Routh, despite headlining a multi-hundred million dollar tentpole, still being an unknown??

But whatever, bring on the Asspologist choir telling me what an idiot I am for not recognizing the megabucks Singerman represents.

Anonymous said...

dah dah dah dah dahhhh
dah dah dah
dah dah dah dah ApologistCuffer


LMAO

Kryptonian

Anonymous said...

Hey Colors...Funny how this "kryptonian" guy missed these two statements...

Robinov to Wall Street Journal - "'Superman Returns' didn't quite work as a film the way we wanted it to. Had 'Superman' worked in 2006, we would have had a movie for Christmas of this year or 2009. But now the plan is just to reintroduce Superman."

Singer to Anne Thompson at Valkyrie premiere - "I have no commitment to another Superman or any other film beyond Valkyrie at this point."

But Singer's sequel is secretly filming and just around the corner folks!! It will be announced any day now or at SDCC or maybe at Wizard World or maybe at...

HAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Steve "Archangel" Manning
steve@savesuperman.com

Anonymous said...

Duh apologists brain-dead sheep

AKA

the blind LEADING the blind. ;)

Anonymous said...

dah dah dah dah dahhhh
dah dah dah
dah dah dah dah Richard Simmons Manning

LMAO

Kryptonian

Anonymous said...

Steve "Richard Simmons" Manning sadi
"
Hey Colors...Funny how this "kryptonian" guy missed these two statements...

Robinov to Wall Street Journal - "'Superman Returns' didn't quite work as a film the way we wanted it to. Had 'Superman' worked in 2006, we would have had a movie for Christmas of this year or 2009. But now the plan is just to reintroduce Superman."

Singer to Anne Thompson at Valkyrie premiere - "I have no commitment to another Superman or any other film beyond Valkyrie at this point."

But Singer's sequel is secretly filming and just around the corner folks!! It will be announced any day now or at SDCC or maybe at Wizard World or maybe at..."

All of this is old news. The most recent news comes from Legendary Pictures and it is a SEQUEL!

HAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Kryptonian

Anonymous said...

Steve "Richard Simmons" Manning said
"
Hey Colors...Funny how this "kryptonian" guy missed these two statements...

Robinov to Wall Street Journal - "'Superman Returns' didn't quite work as a film the way we wanted it to. Had 'Superman' worked in 2006, we would have had a movie for Christmas of this year or 2009. But now the plan is just to reintroduce Superman."

Singer to Anne Thompson at Valkyrie premiere - "I have no commitment to another Superman or any other film beyond Valkyrie at this point."

But Singer's sequel is secretly filming and just around the corner folks!! It will be announced any day now or at SDCC or maybe at Wizard World or maybe at..."

All of this is old news. The most recent news comes from Legendary Pictures and it is a SEQUEL!

HAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Kryptonian

Anonymous said...

Kryptonian, giving head & packing fudge.

Anonymous said...

Apologistcuffer, cuffing his apologist.

LMAO,

Kryptonian

Mike El said...

Steve "Richard Simmons" Manning said
"
Hey Colors...Funny how this "kryptonian" guy missed these two statements...

Robinov to Wall Street Journal - "'Superman Returns' didn't quite work as a film the way we wanted it to. Had 'Superman' worked in 2006, we would have had a movie for Christmas of this year or 2009. But now the plan is just to reintroduce Superman."

Singer to Anne Thompson at Valkyrie premiere - "I have no commitment to another Superman or any other film beyond Valkyrie at this point."

But Singer's sequel is secretly filming and just around the corner folks!! It will be announced any day now or at SDCC or maybe at Wizard World or maybe at..."

All of this is old news. The most recent news comes from Legendary Pictures and it is a SEQUEL!

HAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Kryptonian"


Can you believe this guy? Kryptonian you are so oblivious. There won't be a movie called Superman Unleashed. That idea of a film is a lot worse than Singerman. I don't believe it at all. It's just a bunch of crap if you ask me.

I know we were discussing about SV's 8th season on Save Superman before it went down but I don't know if you all heard that CW has announced they're picking up Smallville for a 9th season.

http://www.moviehole.net/200917899-smallville-sticking-around

"When it comes to ailing TV series, I believe in euthanasia...

"Smallville" has lasted 8 seasons now, and though I still enjoy the show (it's a guilty pleasure), I think every other fan will agree with me when I say it's definitely lost... something. That something could be Michael Rosenbaum, who departed the show last year, and thus, Lex Luthor's no longer around (well, Luthor's been seen briefly - some bald guy has been filling in for Rosenbaum, because he's only been seen from behind, but even an eight-year-old won't be fooled), or maybe it's Lana Lang, played by Kristin Kreuk, who also departed the farming town recently. Or maybe it's the fact that nobody seems to be able to come up with any good storylines for this show anymore!? Ok, so The Green Arrow's back in town, Lois and Clark are only episodes away from smooching, and Doomsday's still a big threat - but c'mon, where's the drama!? where's the surprise guests!? (Tori Spelling!? WTF!?), and where's the cape, already!?. Yeah OK, so the deal was 'No tights, No flying' but I think it's time to break the rule if the show's to continue - we need a reason to keep watching. Maybe that reason can be watching Clark transform, in front of our eyes, into Superman?

Whatever the case, The CW has announced they're picking up "Smallville" for a ninth season.

Rumour has it that Tom Welling was a bit iffy about coming back for another year - but money talks.

I say they make a deal with Rosenbaum now, to return, if even for a few episodes, as Luthor. They also should probably bring Martha Kent (played by Annette O'Toole) back to town. And hey, nobody's really dead in "Smallville", right? Surely Jonathan Kent can be dug up and resurrected by some distant cousin from Krypton?

As it stands, only two of of the original "Smallville" stars - Welling and Allison Mack (who plays Chloe) - are still on the show.

Three other series' that many believed were on life-support, ''Supernatural'', ''One Tree Hill'', and ''90210'', have also been renewed."


Check out Smallville's next episode trailer. It looks really awesome and it is going to kick ass! Smallville returns on March 12th! I can't wait!

Smallville's Season 8 Episode "Infamous" Trailer:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLuHVf58VoMc

Anonymous said...

Steve"Richard Simmons" Manning said

"As for us, we decided while the site is offline to do some needed upgrades, clean up the forums, and come back stronger rather than just being the same. We'll have a whole new look and a whole new attitude."

Three weeks ago Steve Simmons also said his website would be back in just over a week.

I have some questions.

1.Where is your new look, new attitude website?

2.Why a new look and new attitude? Have you been advised to keep your mouth shut on subjects that don't actually pertain to a Superman movie? LMAO

3. Why is it taking so long? Who is doing the upgrades to your website?
Gus Gorman? LMAO

LMAO,

Kryptonian

Mike El said...

Kryptonian, give us a huge favor just shut the fuck up!

Anonymous said...

Kryptonian Troll, giving head AND packing fudge.

theCOLORSblend said...

Anybody else think "Kryptonian" is Neal Bailey?

Anonymous said...

"Anybody else think "Kryptonian" is Neal Bailey?" Colors

He is just as lame, that's for sure. Plus he's got the free time.

You have to remember they are smarting over at the Homopage. Smallville goes on and on whilst any follow up to their beloved Singerman has become a white elephant.

In sucking up to Singer, Younis and Bailey backed the wrong horse. But we knew that.

Father Finian Egan

Anonymous said...

Looks like your horse,savesuperman.com, got shot and sent to the glue factory.

LMAO,

Kryptonian

ApologistPuncher said...

It's obvious this is REtard in his "other" persona.

Don't fall for his bullshit.

Anonymous said...

NEWSFLASH....

Bryan Singer is STILL gay and Brandon Routh STILL has a resume filled with gay roles!!

AND...

BOTH are holding hands in the unemployment line!!

Anonymous said...

Brandon Routh has begun work on Hyde Park Entertainment Group and Platinum Studios Inc. new production "DEAD OF NIGHT". This film is based on the best-selling Italian comic book series, 'Dylan Dog', created by Tiziano Sclavi and published by Italy's Sergio Bonelli Editore. The comic book series has sold more than 56 million units worldwide and has been translated into 17 languages since its debut in 1986. Principal photography is taking place in New Orleans, Louisiana.

Looks like the one who is unemployed is Steve "Richard Simmons I can't get my website back online because I have been forced to create a whole new one" Manning.

LMAO

Kryptonian

Anonymous said...

What's your point with the bartender in a movie that will go nowhere with a low budget?

All this coming from a "I'm hiding behind my computer with a different name than on the other sites to put people down because they are better than me"

Where's your website and what's wrong with someone upgrading their own site?

Who brought the cool guy?....Phil

Anonymous said...

Phyllis said "Where's your website and what's wrong with someone upgrading their own site?"

There is nothing wrong with upgrading your website. The problem is that this is not an upgrade. it will be a whole new site and believe me, Steve "Richard Simmons" Manning will be toning down the rhetoric that has nothing to do with a Superman movie. He has no choice!

As far as my own website, I am not naive enough to believe that WB/DC is going to pay attention to some website spreading hate and discontent. The funniest part is Steve Manning actually thought they would. They are laughing at his expense and so am I!

LMAO,

Kryptonian

Anonymous said...

Hey Kryptonian...

You actually believe what you're trying to tell people?? That's a shame. You'll be quite disappointed. See, I have 3 articles that will be getting things started again.

The first is about our return, why we went down, and what is new on the site. The second will recap events since we went online. The third will re-emphisize that Singer is still gay, Routh can't act in any other role than someone who is gay, and neither should be allowed anywhere near a comic hero that children around the globe look up to.

Sorry to burst your bubble but the look and features of SaveSuperman.com are the only changes. Unless you consider my more "hard core" attitude and the fact I'm done playing the nice guy a change.

See ya soon...

Steve "Archangel" Manning
steve@savesuperman.com

Anonymous said...

Krypto,

We know you here and ss as Clark El, can't you homo's keep one name for god sakes?

And only one person has called me phyllis on these message boards, shouldn't you be typing in bold ;).....rolls eyes

My Apologists (mod) banning from BT was only 30 days, I'll see you soon...

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Krypto,

We know you here and ss as Clark El, can't you homo's keep one name for god sakes?

LMAO, I dont know who SS or Clark El are but I looked back and read Clark El's post about Steve Manning has the right to express his opinion. As far as I can tell Clark El is as much a idiot as Apologistcuffer.

LMAO,

Kryptonian

Anonymous said...

Steve "Richard Simmons" Manning posted this February 23rd on another blog. "For those who've missed the presence of SaveSuperman.com, you won't have to wait much longer. We'll be back on March 1st with renewed strength, a new look, and a whole new attitude!!"
Here it is March 4th and not only is there no renewed strength or a new look, and a whole new attitude there is no savesuperman.com website!

LMAO! When and if there is a new savesuperman.com and I say new because it will not be the former one because Steve Manning was advised to change it, Steve will be toning down his rhetoric about things that don't apply to a Superman movie.
Good one Steve "Richard Simmons" Manning. You have now posted twice that you would be back up and running and still no savesuperman.com.

LMAO,

Kryptonian

Anonymous said...

You posted twice that you would be up and running by a certain date and have missed the date both times.

Is Gus Gorman really your website host?

LMAO,

Kryptonian

Anonymous said...

Hey Kryptonian fudge-packer, you MAY want to try posting your crap in the most recent article. That way if you want Steve Manning (2 words not 4) or AP to see your crap, they'll be more likely to. I believe you're the MAIN reason we keep coming back to this particular thread anyway.

Do ya think you can stay away from the circle jerk over on the Homopage long enough to accomplish this feat? I know, it'll be HARD, but that's right up your 'alley' anyway, isn't it? ;)

non_amos

Anonymous said...

Guess who's back!!

That's right...SaveSuperman.com returns a bit later than we expected on Saturday March 7th. Keep checking throughout the day as we don't have an exact time, but we WILL be online before Midnight.

Steve "Archangel" Manning
steve@savesuperman.com

Anonymous said...

Paging Mr. Kryptonian...

We're back jack ass!! And as you'll see, my "rhetoric" as you call it is far from being toned down. You see, NOBODY told me to do anything in regards to the changes on the website. Users made recommendations and we made updates. My outlook on life, liberty, and the pursuit of a better Superman film are unchanged.

So get used to us being around. And get used to the idea of a reboot because it's coming...

Steve "Archangel" Manning
steve@savesuperman.com

Anonymous said...

I see Steve "Richard Simmons" Manning has toned it down and has changed his website as I had predicted.
He even admitted that they had "lost credibility' with some very important people.

LMAO, you had no credibility Steve and all your previous statements about not toning it down and
coming back with a vengence was nothing but lies.
I was right. You definately toned your hate rhetoric down and your constant lies upon lies to cover your lies at the advice of your attorneys.
Now you look like the pathetic little wimp you really are!

LMAO,

Kryptonian

Anonymous said...

AP I noticed that you refer to sucking a lot, and various orafices....is that what the bad people did to you?. Is that what they made you do to them. Come on. Let it out...We are all listening and here for you now....Does Singer remind you of that bad man, your bogey man?....Come on AP....let it out...

Anonymous said...

AP is just a fucking moron and a fucking nerd that needs to get a fucking life. All you Superman fanboy extremists need to get a fucking life. I still can't believe none of you can't get over this fucking stupid movie that came out 3 years ago that Singer fucked up. Get the fuck over it for the crying out loud. Stop being so whiny nerds/fanboys. I quit that stupid website that you called Save Superman. It wasn't saving the Superman franchise. All it was just fans attacking and flame baiting each other and bashing and extremely criticizing on the film makers, writers, and cast on the last Superman film. That was all it was.

Anonymous said...

And just WHO were you at SaveSuperman? Hmmm?