Wednesday, August 08, 2007

The Man in the Mask Does NOT like Singerman

Here's another amusing string of videos that were just put up on YouTube by 'The Hideout" where the hosts take Singerman to task. (better late than never I guess) I'm not really sure why the guy on the left is wearing a wrestling mask? Maybe he was a crew member?



Aside from the fact that they keep saying that Superman: The Movie came out in 1979 (as opposed to 1978) everything else seems to be pretty much on point. There's 3 more parts to the Singerman series if you're interested.

Part 2 , Part 3 , Part 4


And hey, don't forget: BOOT SINGER, REBOOT SUPERMAN!!

64 comments:

swright said...

That mask looks like one of the masks for The Immortals from 300.

Anonymous said...

Goofy and Lame. Enjoyed Marvel vs. DC more. I predict an announcement soon that will not make SSS happy............

Superman in 2009!

Restart

Man i am surprised this Blog has lasted as long as it did.

ApologistPuncher said...

It was CLASSIC. The only people that WOULDN'T agree have issues with men and "salad tossing".

JLA is coming fast, and there will be a WHOLE LOT of crying, followed by defeated silence from the Apologist bitches..... Go smart people!!

Anonymous said...

"JLA is coming fast, and there will be a WHOLE LOT of crying, followed by defeated silence from the Apologist bitches..... Go smart people!!"

JL is going nowhere you are in for a real dissapointment on that one. Although it will be funny to laugh at you.

Anonymous said...

I love how these idiots are talking about their fans. Every idiot that makes a youtube video now thinks he has fans.

ApologistPuncher said...

"JL is going nowhere you are in for a real dissapointment on that one. Although it will be funny to laugh at you."

See this, the fucker PROVES me RIGHT:

"It was CLASSIC. The only people that WOULDN'T agree have issues with men and "salad tossing"."

JLA is like a freight train, and no Singerman will stop THAT locomotive....

Fuck off, Apologist piss-puddle!

Anonymous said...

"JLA is like a freight train, and no Singerman will stop THAT locomotive....

Fuck off, Apologist piss-puddle!"

A freight train. Nobody knows jack shit about the movie but it is a freight train. Oh yeah this movie is just buzzing all over the place get real moron nobody has any idea what is going on right now. Maybe WB will do SR 2 maybe they won't but a JL movie is a pipe dream you'll see it's not happening anytime soon. WB chucked countless sctipts and directors for Superman in the last 10 years but now suddenly a JL movie will get fast tracked yeah right not if WB and DC's track record continues it won't.

ApologistPuncher said...

"A freight train. Nobody knows jack shit about the movie but it is a freight train. Oh yeah this movie is just buzzing all over the place get real moron nobody has any idea what is going on right now. Maybe WB will do SR 2 maybe they won't but a JL movie is a pipe dream you'll see it's not happening anytime soon. WB chucked countless sctipts and directors for Superman in the last 10 years but now suddenly a JL movie will get fast tracked yeah right not if WB and DC's track record continues it won't."

TRANSLATION:

"I don't know jack SHIT about this film's status, I'm basing this on my own IGNORANCE and OPINION"

Fuck off, shit for brains.

Anonymous said...

"TRANSLATION:

"I don't know jack SHIT about this film's status, I'm basing this on my own IGNORANCE and OPINION"

Fuck off, shit for brains."

You lnow even LESS about a JL film status. Do they have a director, a cast, producers uh lets see none of the above. So pipe down jackass you know next to nothing about this movie, nobody does.

ApologistPuncher said...

"You lnow even LESS about a JL film status. Do they have a director, a cast, producers uh lets see none of the above. So pipe down jackass you know next to nothing about this movie, nobody does."

Obviously I know MORE than YOU do, dbss80. Just because YOU are an ignorant fuck, doesn't mean the rest of us share the same mental defects as yourself.

I love how these Apologist twats think "If I don't know, YOU don't". No wonder they enjoy munching BS' testicles....

Anonymous said...

"Obviously I know MORE than YOU do, dbss80. Just because YOU are an ignorant fuck, doesn't mean the rest of us share the same mental defects as yourself.

I love how these Apologist twats think "If I don't know, YOU don't". No wonder they enjoy munching BS' testicles...."

This is what? You getting the last word in even though you offered up nothing new. Tell me what you know about this JL movie other than they have a script and nothing else. The answer is nothing absolutely nothing.

Fact- DC and Warner's take their seeet time with these movies unless that changes this is a long way off.

Anonymous said...

SR sucked but a JL movie will also suck shit bring on the Reboot. I don't want Welling either get another unknown who has actually some acting chops and does not just look like Superman.

Supermanreboot2009.

Anonymous said...

I recommend watching all those clips, they're quite funny guys, and I can only agree with their observations. Not quite so sure about Tim Burton's ideas for Supes though....

Anyone know their accent? At one point they referred to Beverly Hills and pointed as if it was just over to the left.

Anonymous said...

I agree - they are very funny, and they really articulate everything wrong with Singerman, from the costume, casting, poor storyline, all the way down to the horrible interpretation of the character of Superman.

- CK

Anonymous said...

Singer is a FAG and Superman Returns was gay.

Anonymous said...

" Singer is a FAG and Superman Returns was gay."

You know you just can't argue with that

Anonymous said...

These videos are some of the best and most entertaining I have seen on youtube. They have a bunch of them up to on different movies.

Anonymous said...

Everything they said is 100% true.

Anonymous said...

"Everything they said is 100% true."

Really STM came out in 1979 i never knew that.

Anonymous said...

What's up with this 1979 78 business??? Do you realise not everyone saw superman in the usa or UK?? Superman The Movie came out in 1979 in most of europe and for those who saw it on video vhs it came out in 1979 for all of them as that was what was printed on the back of the vhs video release. 78 for usa UK and some other countries and 79 for a host of others. Get off this 78 vs 79 thing. Both years are correct depending on what version of the movie you saw.

Anonymous said...

...and in other news Transformers has now hit 300 million dollars domestic and there's still another week of summer left.

Anonymous said...

GOD DAMN!

Transformers is probably going to end up like the second or third highest grossing film of this summer behind Spiderman 3!

I guess the 80's can be cool again just not in the case of Singerman.

Anonymous said...

"Really STM came out in 1979 i never knew that."

Considering the amount of things these guys point out that Singer got wrong, this amounts to typical Singersucker lameness. Clutching at straws.....

Chicago ComicCon.....the panel for Dark Knight poured more cold water on Singer.....again and again and again.

Bye bye Bryan, stick to making films for fags. As demonstrated on here, they're the only ones who appreciate it

Anonymous said...

"Chicago ComicCon.....the panel for Dark Knight poured more cold water on Singer.....again and again and again."

What did they say and yes i want a link???

Anonymous said...

Oh yeah and what did they say at Comic-Con about why Nolan has Ledger dressed up like Brandon Lee from the crow and that he will butcher the Joker because he sucks as an actor?

Anonymous said...

"Oh yeah and what did they say at Comic-Con about why Nolan has Ledger dressed up like Brandon Lee from the crow and that he will butcher the Joker because he sucks as an actor?"

No they didn't say anything like that. Everyone was too busy being blown away by the discussion and sneak preview......

What a fuckin retard. Not true to your beloved comic books I suppose. Fuckin grow up jackass.

There were people wondering why Singer dressed Routh up as a fag though, and how Routh, Singer, Spacey, Bosworth butchered Superman.

You should have attended, maybe one day when you don't need your parents permission perhaps

Anonymous said...

"Oh yeah and what did they say at Comic-Con about why Nolan has Ledger dressed up like Brandon Lee from the crow and that he will butcher the Joker because he sucks as an actor?"

And incase anyone hasn't noticed by now, but here's another classic Singersucker apologist tactic.....just drag everything down to Singer's level of crap...even if you haven't even seen it yet.

We've seen it a thousand times on here...Reeve wasn't that great...Batman Begins wasn't that great...Sam Raimi is a hack...nobody likes Tom Welling either.......

Believe it apologists, there are many better things than Singerman

Anonymous said...

Pirates won't do as well as Returns...

Spiderman 3 won't do as well as Returns...

Transformers won't do as well as Returns...

The Simpsons won't do as well as Returns...

...and now, again without seeing it, The Dark Knight looks doomed to a similar fate

That should make Warners feel confident then.

Anonymous said...

"No they didn't say anything like that. Everyone was too busy being blown away by the discussion and sneak preview......

What a fuckin retard. Not true to your beloved comic books I suppose. Fuckin grow up jackass.

There were people wondering why Singer dressed Routh up as a fag though, and how Routh, Singer, Spacey, Bosworth butchered Superman.

You should have attended, maybe one day when you don't need your parents permission perhaps"

So in summary you have no link to back up anything you claim they said about Singer and SR right got ya.

Anonymous said...

"So in summary you have no link to back up anything you claim they said about Singer and SR right got ya."

"got ya" nothing dickhead.

Do you honestly think this is the only place where disapointment with Singer and Returns is expressed? You can't seriously be as naive as you suggest to think that Returns haters are confined to on here. There has been talk EVERYfuckinWHERE about the debacle that is Returns...and Wizard World (not Comic-Con, as you WRONGLY suggested. Get YOUR fuckin facts straight fuckhead)is yet another public forum for venting hatred towards Singer.

Again, go back to your comic books you cry baby....and no matter what you childlishly suggest..The Dark Knight buzz was MASSIVE.

..and for fuck's sake Returns was Sooooooo conspicuous AGAIN by it's absence in Warners publicity and Mattel DC merchandise.

Anonymous said...

"So in summary you have no link to back up anything you claim they said about Singer and SR right got ya."

So, in summary..."You mean people at a Comic Convention expressed their disappointment in Superman Returns? I'm such a fan of gay superhero movies I refuse to believe that could happen"

What a fuckin dickhead

Anonymous said...

http://singerssupermansucks.blogspot.com/

There's the link....I said it on here and I got the t shirt!

Like I said, perhaps when you don't need your parents' permission to leave your bedroom, you too can attend.

Go dressed as Brandon Routh and try to convince people of the merit of the gayfest you love so much and tell them how much DK is going to suck......then wake up in casualty

Anonymous said...

^^^HAHAHAHAHA

Anonymous said...

"Go dressed as Brandon Routh and try to convince people of the merit of the gayfest you love so much and tell them how much DK is going to suck......then wake up in casualty"

The gayfest that is SR and yet TDK will rule starring a hack in Ledger who's claim to fame is making out with a guy on screen for 2 hrs give me a break. SR is gay you guys say but Ledger was the star in a GAY COWBOY MOVIE and TDK will kick ass.

Oh yeah and you still gave me no link to back up what you said just like i thought.

colors said...

I wasn't nuts about Begins but at least that's a sequel with some potential.

colors said...

And by the way, those guys might be on point about Singerman (and many of us seem to think they are) but I still wouldn't trust those morons with the franchise.

I do think Caviezel would've been the man for the role in a better film by a better filmmaker however.

Anonymous said...

"Oh yeah and you still gave me no link to back up what you said just like i thought."

I did, the link is to here where I said it. Keep up junior

How fuckin stupid are you....and keep predicting how gay TDK will be. We're used to apologist fuckwits making predictions that turn out to be laughable.

Anonymous said...

"The gayfest that is SR and yet TDK will rule starring a hack in Ledger who's claim to fame is making out with a guy on screen for 2 hrs give me a break."

Who is this kid??

It's called acting you idiot, it's different playing a gay character as opposed to being in a gay film, made for "chicks" as Singer himself put it.....and didn't that "hack" win awards for that film?? I didn't see many awards in the same credible league for Routh's portrayal of "Gay Superman" or for Spacey as "Gay Luthor" or even for Singer as "Gay Maestro"

You have no fuckin idea.

You hurl shit at George Miller and Heath Ledger yet you have seen what Singer HAS done with the Superman franchise and you remain so stubbornly stupid that you criticise others who YOU HAVEN'T EVEN SEEN YET.

That hardly does wonders for your credibility, does it?

Stick to your comic books moron

Anonymous said...

"That hardly does wonders for your credibility, does it?"

credibility, he wouldn't even know the meaning of the word.

I mean, nobody's buzzed about Dark Knight

sheesh

Anonymous said...

"Steve Younis signed on the dotted line not to bash Superman Returns and he'll get promotions, and to the next movies as well. It was revealed in his chatroom the day of his sellout to WB's lawyers!"

What a fucking joke

And the sheep still take what that loser says as fact..he's a Singer yes man

Anonymous said...

After Steve Younis signed on the dotted line (selling his soul to Warners), he retracted all of his honest and constructive criticism about the suit with FINAL SAY, at this link.
http://www.supermanhomepage.com/movies/movies.php?topic=sr-costume

Anonymous said...

http://www.supermanhomepage.com/movies/movies.php?topic=sr-costume

Good find.

He is lame beyond belief, with zero credibility

Anonymous said...

Steve Younis on the Singer suit:

"I've heard this high collar is to hide some kind of muscle body-suit underneath... but I don't know. Either way it looks silly, stuffs up the cape, and is impractical in my opinion. Even the George Reeves costume (which had a round neck) didn't go this high."

What a fuckin hypocrite

Anonymous said...

I mean, nobody's buzzed about Dark Knight

are you kidding me? Were you even at the Chicago Con this past weekend?

Anonymous said...

are you kidding me? Were you even at the Chicago Con this past weekend?

Oh hello, yes.....It's called sarcasm and irony...again, sheesh!

There's just one boy here unbuzzed because he doesn't think it feels like his beloved comic books. What a childish dickhead

Anonymous said...

"nobody's buzzed about Dark Knight

are you kidding me? Were you even at the Chicago Con this past weekend?"

Of course people are buzzed about TDK at an event like that. It is filled with fanboys. The Gen public is not really aware of TDK yet that usually does not happen until at least the first full length trailer is out. Really not until an AD campaign is in full gere can you really gauge how psyched the public is for a movie. When Singer brought his SR footage to Comic Con a few years ago they went crazy for it they demanded he play it again they loved it so much. All i am saying is there is a difference between the public's anticipation of a comic film and the public.

Anonymous said...

"difference between the public's anticipation of a comic film and the public."

That's difference between fanboys and the public my bad.

Anonymous said...

That's difference between fanboys and the public my bad."

..and to be fair, that's a reasonable point. Trust me though, the marketing will be incredible, but the clincher will come when people see the trailer, if this footage is anything to go on.

Where Returns looked underwhelming to the general public, this looks "chillingly exciting"

ApologistPuncher said...

"..and to be fair, that's a reasonable point. Trust me though, the marketing will be incredible, but the clincher will come when people see the trailer, if this footage is anything to go on."

Actually, it WOULD be a "good point", if it wasn't actually typical Apologist flip-flop.

See, you CAN'T gauge public dis-like of Singerman Peeps. CAN'T be done. It doesn't "jive" with their obsession. BUT, you CAN gauge public interest in The Dark Knight. Because it will be yet ANOTHER successful franchise that has nothing but good things going for it. You know, the complete OPPOSITE of Singerman? So they WANT it to fail, just as they did with Transformers, Pirates, and EVEN the Simpsons movie...

Anonymous said...

"So they WANT it to fail, just as they did with Transformers, Pirates, and EVEN the Simpsons movie..."

Yes, the failure of those films, and Spiderman3 were all smugly predicted on here by apologists.

There one thing to be said for admiring Returns (madness), but it's living in fantasy land when apologists suggest it's the benchmark for a successful super hero franchise!!

That's just crazy talk

ApologistPuncher said...

"That's just crazy talk"

Pretty much the DEFINITION of an Apologist right there.

Do you REALLY think ANYONE with brain cells "liked" Singerman Peeps?

Anonymous said...

"BUT, you CAN gauge public interest in The Dark Knight."

How can you do that at this point? What has been released other than a Teaser which was in limited release. What i said earlier is correct nobody knows how the public interest fully is until they are literally weeks before release when the ad campaign is in full swing. Studios do polling to gauge public awareness weeks before release. Spiderman 3 had that a few weeks prior it came in at something like 92% awareness so no surprise it opened bigger than any film in history. TDK awareness with the public we won't know that until next summer. Fanboy awareness is very high they are psyched for this movie.

ApologistPuncher said...

"How can you do that at this point? What has been released other than a Teaser which was in limited release. What i said earlier is correct nobody knows how the public interest fully is until they are literally weeks before release when the ad campaign is in full swing. Studios do polling to gauge public awareness weeks before release. Spiderman 3 had that a few weeks prior it came in at something like 92% awareness so no surprise it opened bigger than any film in history. TDK awareness with the public we won't know that until next summer. Fanboy awareness is very high they are psyched for this movie."

See that folks? The Apologist MISSED THE POINT. Who could have expected THAT?

Anonymous said...

"See that folks? The Apologist MISSED THE POINT. Who could have expected THAT?"

You have to make a point to miss it, get back to me when you have something relevant to add. In other words i won't be hearing from you.

ApologistPuncher said...

"You have to make a point to miss it, get back to me when you have something relevant to add. In other words i won't be hearing from you."

In other words: "I'm STILL too fucking STUPID to COMPREHEND what the "big words" mean".

I love when these shit-suckers try to "cover" their stupidity with feigned intelligence. They really ARE too REtarded to see that ANYONE can read what was posted, and see how ignorant they are.

Fuck you, Apologist salad-tosser!

Anonymous said...

"I love when these shit-suckers try to "cover" their stupidity with feigned intelligence. They really ARE too REtarded to see that ANYONE can read what was posted, and see how ignorant they are.

Fuck you, Apologist salad-tosser!"

Wow when you actually have a point to make come on back because this is just a method of avoiding the issue at hand and a rather transparent one at that.

ApologistPuncher said...

"Wow when you actually have a point to make come on back because this is just a method of avoiding the issue at hand and a rather transparent one at that."

Yep, the BEST this nut-waxer can do is post a run-on sentence that STILL says: "I'm a fucking moron!".

See, as an Apologist, he is already "tagged" as being mentally deficient. So what he does is try to play it off as EVERYONE ELSE is "stupid", and if he doesn't "get" something, it's THEIR fault and not "his". Typical ploy of the uneducated.

Oops, I did it again... 'Nother Apologist fuckwit knocked-out! But I already know it's the SAME bitch I've slapped around repeatedly, so it's a "hollow" victory.

Anonymous said...

"Oops, I did it again... 'Nother Apologist fuckwit knocked-out! But I already know it's the SAME bitch I've slapped around repeatedly, so it's a "hollow" victory."

Now he is claiming victory without making a single point. Don't ever run for office pal.

Anonymous said...

I am still waiting for you to debate me on my prior post. Instead you are rambling on with curse words and immature insults. Like i said that is just a tactic to avoid the issue. If you had a point to make we would be discussing it right now instead you are basically having a hissy fit.

ApologistPuncher said...

No need to quote here, as it's the SAME PERSON posting TWICE.

If YOU are unable to READ & COMPREHEND, don't expect me to spell it out for you, junior. That's what your elementary school teachers are for.

God, this fucking mental-midget REALLY IS too stupid to understand what was said! Does this dim-wit not see what a fucking CLOWN he is making himself out to be??

Anonymous said...

"God, this fucking mental-midget REALLY IS too stupid to understand what was said! Does this dim-wit not see what a fucking CLOWN he is making himself out to be??"

Who the hell are you talking to? This is just you and me going back and forth nobody else. In what world do you live in that using language like this

"I did it again... 'Nother Apologist fuckwit knocked-out! But I already know it's the SAME bitch I've slapped around repeatedly, so it's a "hollow" victory"

Makes you look good and me look bad. You look even worse since you discuss no issues, no points just spout off at the mouth in an obvious attempt to come off as tough.

ApologistPuncher said...

"Makes you look good and me look bad. You look even worse since you discuss no issues, no points just spout off at the mouth in an obvious attempt to come off as tough."

Since the OTHER PEOPLE WHO READ THIS SITE can READ what I wrote, your ignorance is LAUGHABLY obvious for EVERYONE to see.

See, you addle-brained douche, check my posts. My point, in the one that is giving YOU so much TROUBLE, is all the proof I need of my SUPERIOR intelligence. As if punctuation wasn't ALREADY a "clue". If YOU can't ascertain what I was saying, DOESN'T mean to everyone ELSE there is "no points".

I appreciate you doing your best to look fucking REtarded, and in the process me look like fucking Einstein, I don't need YOUR help. Go back to the other BS ball-sack suckers at BlueNuts.

Stay out of the deep end, shit for brains.

Anonymous said...

"My point, in the one that is giving YOU so much TROUBLE, is all the proof I need of my SUPERIOR intelligence."

Lets try this again.

This is what your point was initially right.

"See, you CAN'T gauge public dis-like of Singerman Peeps. CAN'T be done. It doesn't "jive" with their obsession. BUT, you CAN gauge public interest in The Dark Knight. Because it will be yet ANOTHER successful franchise that has nothing but good things going for it. You know, the complete OPPOSITE of Singerman? So they WANT it to fail, just as they did with Transformers, Pirates, and EVEN the Simpsons movie..."

This was my response.

"How can you do that at this point? What has been released other than a Teaser which was in limited release. What i said earlier is correct nobody knows how the public interest fully is until they are literally weeks before release when the ad campaign is in full swing. Studios do polling to gauge public awareness weeks before release. Spiderman 3 had that a few weeks prior it came in at something like 92% awareness so no surprise it opened bigger than any film in history. TDK awareness with the public we won't know that until next summer. Fanboy awareness is very high they are psyched for this movie."

Now lets see if you can be a good little boy and answer in a way that does not make you sound like a psycho doing time. I am more than happy to debate you but if all you want to do is talk shit then forget it you are wasting my time.

ApologistPuncher said...

"Now lets see if you can be a good little boy and answer in a way that does not make you sound like a psycho doing time. I am more than happy to debate you but if all you want to do is talk shit then forget it you are wasting my time."

Actually, you fucking nut-licker, THIS was YOUR original "point":

"The gayfest that is SR and yet TDK will rule starring a hack in Ledger who's claim to fame is making out with a guy on screen for 2 hrs give me a break. SR is gay you guys say but Ledger was the star in a GAY COWBOY MOVIE and TDK will kick ass."

YOU were implying that you KNEW that TDK was NOT going to be successful, that the public won't go for Heath Ledger as the Joker. NOW see my post, you fucking joke.

Wasting YOUR time? You fucking idiot, you're a piece of shit APOLOGIST on a SINGER'S SUPERMAN SUCKS site!

God, I wish I could see this cunt-rag in person. 5 ft NOTHING, 265 lbs, and ACNE covering 90% of "his" face. Oh, and has NEVER touched a person of the opposite sex.....