Wednesday, August 01, 2007

The Sound of Silence

S.S.S. just checking in folks, back from the sun and fun in the great state of California. (It's great when you have a job that let's you schedule business trips around major geek events.) I had the privilege of catching the weekend happenings at the San Diego Comic Con International. Between this and the Superman Festival in the span of a few weeks, I've had enough of awkward people in funny costumes to last me a good LONG time.

Anyway, as I expected, there was nary a mention of anything related to Singerman at the convention, which should seem odd to those who believe a Singerman sequel could hit theaters in Summer 2009. When you consider that The Dark Knight which is due out next summer, had just a few big announcements at last year's Con including the title and the casting of the new villain, you'd think that there might be something, ANYTHING, about a proposed sequel to Singerman to keep your core audience and media in the loop especially given the seeming back and forth stories we've been getting between the studio and those who suckle at Singer's teet.

I realize according to Alan Horn a few weeks back, they were still in the stage of waiting to see the next pile of crap that Singer would be turning in, but if they had any faith in the franchise or desire to keep it in the spotlight at all, this weekend would've been the chance to do something. They could've at least propped Routh up in a booth or something to give his usual schpiel about "all being well" as far as he knows. Lord knows, he's not doing anything else.

Apropos of nothing, they did have KICK ASS panels for Heroes and Smallville at the Con.

Oh and don't forget: BOOT SINGER, REBOOT SUPERMAN!!

198 comments:

Anonymous said...

At the Comic-Con Smallville panel there also was the announcement that Dean Cain will be guest-starring in the 4th Episode of the new season as a villain.

Anonymous said...

LOL the only place you’ll ever see no hit wonder Routh again is doing a cameo on Smallville next to this generation’s REAL Man of Tomorrow, Tom Welling.

Joel1245 said...

"...given the seeming back and forth stories we've getting between the studio and those who suckle at Singer's teet."

LMAO. Priceless! lol

Anonymous said...

uhuh...This site has predicted that singer would be removed for about 9 months now so far it has not happened. The only reason this site is still up is because the same 3 people keep posting. And AP I was never proven wrong. The sequel is still on........

On for 2009 that is!

Restart

So far other then speculation, this site has not offered proof otherwise.
Also if you factor in all the failed attempts at the simpson movie we are still looking at a deficiet.

Anonymous said...

SSS one more thing. Why wasn't there a presentation for Captin America. Oh thars right IT OPENS IN 2009!!!!.......just like

SUPERMAN IN 2009!

Restart

Ummm i dont think there was one movie coming in 2009! that was adverstised in this year Comic Con.

Anonymous said...

We have known for months that they were not going to be at comic-con so i don't get why you posted this.

ApologistPuncher said...

Don't you just LOVE IT when people who weren't even THERE chime in to say someone who WAS is "wrong"??

To the douchebag above, BS and his cronies DID NOT need to be there. WB WAS, and not ONE word about a Singerman sequel, or even a mention of Singerman ITSELF. THAT speaks volumes, and if you can't see that, you're ALSO a fucking REtard.

And to you ladyboy, you WERE proven WRONG and you didn't keep your "word", so shut your fucking mouth, jizz-stain.

voice_of_reasom said...

what dont you get Retard? SSS hasnt 'predicted" anything on this blog.
The Dark Knight doesnt come out until 2008, but yet they announced both the movie title and the main villain at SDCC in 2006 even though there was no panel, which shows you where that movie was in it's production at that point in time. Where is the Singerman sequel right now? Not even close to where that was. There's NO WAY theres a sequel out by 2009, if there even was one. At this point in it's development TDK had a script, a greenlight, a title, and a new villain cast. Singerman is stuck in development hell while Singer is off boinking Tom Cruise in Germany amd getting ready for his gay mayor of SF movie.

Superman may be returning in 2009, but it's most likely in a JLA movie.

brandon_routh_fucking_sucks said...

We have known for months that they were not going to be at comic-con so i don't get why you posted this.

I call bullshit on you, sir. There were apologists predicting a sequel announcement at SDCC for months over on SHH, BlowTights, and SupermanHomoPage. Now after the fact, you've "known it for months." Typical revisionist apologist history, just like when you fools were predicitng the film would have a boxx office over $350 million domestic, and then changed your tunes. Go home.

Anonymous said...

"I call bullshit on you, sir. There were apologists predicting a sequel announcement at SDCC for months over on SHH, BlowTights, and SupermanHomoPage. Now after the fact, you've "known it for months." Typical revisionist apologist history, just like when you fools were predicitng the film would have a boxx office over $350 million domestic, and then changed your tunes. Go home."

Call BS on yourself asshole. The official announcement as to who was going to be at comic-con came out weeks ago and the rumors were that SR was not going to be there was being talked about for months. If a few SR fans claimed otherwise they were simply uninformed. Take a look at this link from June 5th. You see any reference of SR being there because i don't.

http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/features/2007/comiccon/index.php?layout=news&news_id=6284

Sepharih said...

"SSS one more thing. Why wasn't there a presentation for Captin America. Oh thars right IT OPENS IN 2009!!!!.......just like

SUPERMAN IN 2009!"

Whatever actually happens with Singerman, the chances of Captain America coming out in 2009 are almost non-existent at this point. They don't have a director attached yet, and that they didn't announce it at comic con isn't a good sign. It'll happen eventually, but I wouldn't hold your breath for 2009.

Anonymous said...

Many sites are now reporting the heavy speculation and buzz that George Miller is being sought to direct the JUSTICE LEAGUE movie. Yes, they ARE looking at directors already.

colors said...

"This site has predicted that singer would be removed for about 9 months now so far it has not happened"

I don't keep up with every little thing SSS posts but I don't remember a prediction of Singer getting canned. I can quite easily remember posts where he all but BEGGED for Singer's termination though, which is hardly the same thing.

Although given Horn's "ringing endorsement" of Singerman 2 a few weeks ago, I'd say Singer's position is anything but secure.

Anonymous said...

Yep. And don't count on Routh reprising the role in a JL film. I think if we see a Justice League picture, it will be with a different Superman, in actor, type, and presence. The precise reason the studio would be doing this picture is to get *away* from the memory and style of SR, not to relate *to* it. I think they are going to be looking at "other people"...

Anonymous said...

Every single apologist reason for why SR “underperformed” has been debunked this summer with films in very similar case studies.

Transformers has shown that a property at its popular peak in the 80’s can be brought back with astounding success today even in the mids of another huge heavily hyped feature opening the week after.

The Simpsons feature has also shown that it doesn’t matter if characters have been shoved down the mouths of the populace for the last nearly twenty years and in the case of the Simpsons at least 3 times a night on broadcast alone and still airing in first runs during the fall, people will still flock to see it on the big screen.

Anonymous said...

Jeez, I would've thought Wouth would've taken the opportunity to attend the ComicCon.

What a perfect opportunity for him to flog off his autograph.

Then again I suppose by now even he'd understand there'd be very little demand for it. swright, Retard and Steve Younis probably already have it by now.

Anonymous said...

You couldn't get more of a Simpsons bombardment recently....didn't put many off from seeing the film

Proving yet again that....

Restart is a ReTard!

Anonymous said...

http://www.collider.com/entertainment/news/article.asp/aid/5022/tcid/1

Justice League to return to Smallville...and as someone pointed out earlier, it's starting to look more and more like Warners ARE fast tracking a JLA live action film with George Miller being pursued to direct.

Dump Singer and bring it on!!!

but frankly, I hope Routh goes the way of Singer too!

Terminal

Anonymous said...

How long will THAT news take to surface on Singersucker sites??

Anonymous said...

That link doesn't work.

Anonymous said...

"Justice League to return to Smallville...and as someone pointed out earlier, it's starting to look more and more like Warners ARE fast tracking a JLA live action film with George Miller being pursued to direct."

You really want a JL movie i mean seriously. What the hell are the odds that will be any good and not a fucking cheesy ass mess? Superman will only get shafted again because he will not be the main part of the film, only one of many heroes. I want WB to just sit back a few years and wait. Come back with a new director and vision more from the comics and do a new Superman movie. If WB does this JL movie and it fails we are not going to see Superman on screen again for a really long time. I want a new Superman movie done right more than this JL movie and i am willing to wait for it.

Anonymous said...

"You really want a JL movie i mean seriously."

No seriously, when the alternative is Singer

You're logic is fucked again. They're clearly NOT going to wait...Singer's supposedly pitching his sequel and Horn has said he'll consider it, whereas the momentum behind a JLA film just keeps on snowballing

Anonymous said...

eerrr, that link works fine for me.

New director, new Superman. Sounds cool

Anonymous said...

...and predictably, whereas other sites claim that it looks as if the JLA film will come before a Returns sequel, good ol faithful to Singer until it's retarded, Steve Younis claims that he RECKONS the Returns sequel will come first.

That guy and his biased site are laughable. If Younis had half a fuckin brain he'd be campaigning to get Singer the sack too, for the good of the franchise. But how easily bought is the guy?? They give him a day trip tour of the set and he thinks he's some insider who bends over for Singer at every opportunity.

....and braindead sheep like swright lap it up time and time again

Remember,
homosexuality is a sin,
Father Finian Egan

Anonymous said...

"Justice League" film is more of a priority for WB than the sequel to "Superman," so don't be surprised if you see Brandon Routh in "Justice League" before any new "Superman" film." collider

Somebody pass that on to Younis please. He seems not to be taking notice for some strange reason. Must be jacking off over Routh's piccy again.

I'd be surprised to see Routh back, to be honest. Warners realise that the guy's got so much baggage and doesn't even look the part. Plus, he'd suck all the fun out of it, such is his onscreen demeanour.

With all the news about Smallville, JLA rumours, the premiere of "Death Of Superman" you'd have to say it looks like an increasingly LOOOONG shot that Singer's returning

Anonymous said...

"As far as we know both the "Justice League" movie and the "Superman Returns" sequel are both going ahead." Steve Younis

Can you believe it, he's confirmed BOTH films there without a scrap of evidence to back himself up. I bet Robert Burnett certainly didn't tip him off!

And the guy wonders why he's a joke on so many other sites! He's reported the Miller news ONLY to rebutt it and give Returns a leg up again

Anonymous said...

Well I was scooped that Steve Younis signed on the dotted line not to bash Superman Returns and he'll get promotions, and to the next movies as well. It was revealed in his chatroom the day of his sellout to WB's lawyers!

swright said...

From CHUD..

"Will it be called Superman and the Justice League? Reports earlier this month has Kevin Spacey coming back as Lex Luthor in a Superman sequel… which this could possibly be considered. This would be a wise move for WB, as they get to claim they’re doing a Superman sequel while launching a new team franchise and possibly setting up a half dozen new single character franchises in one fell swoop"

You know, even though I'm one of the HATED apologists over here, I have to say...This? Sounds really cool. As long as Superman is front and center of any JLA movie, I won't care if they don't do the MOS if that's what we are going to get. I may have liked SR a lot, but I'd be just as happy with this one.

swright said...

From Superherohype..

"I've also heard from sources that the "Justice League" film is more of a priority for WB than the sequel to "Superman," so don't be surprised if you see Brandon Routh in "Justice League" before any new "Superman" film."

Those that want BR off of any Superman sequel may not get their wish. It's pure speculation, but that's all we are doing right now anyway.

Anonymous said...

Spacey is only doing the Superman films because of Singer. If Singer isnt on the project he wont do a JLA film.

As for Routh staying on a JLA film, he needs to go a long with Singer. Routh is too attached to Singer's stupid continuity. If Routh is in the film, all of the stupidity from SR comes along with him. Sorry Routh, you and your driftwood emotional range needs to go too.

swright said...

" If Routh is in the film, all of the stupidity from SR comes along with him. "

Not really...If you think about it, all they need to do is have BR's Superman saving someone from east bumble fuck and one of the other heroes shows up to help. He then could find out that other hero's were here during his absense working in secret to protect themselves, and he then goes and recruits them to from the Justice League to fight off an enemy that he can't handle alone, like DOOMSDAY. There are ways to distance BR's Superman from SR if they choose to.

WB's may actually stay with him because it's an actor that people already recognize as Superman for a sequel, and he wasn't the problem with SR among the general audience and critics. Plus if you are going to have CB in the movie then it would make sense to have the already established Superman in the movie as well.

However, they could easily go the other way and recast as well.

Anonymous said...

You wont see Bale in the JLA movie. The whole concept of the JLA undermines the entire premise of Nolan's Batman world which is grounded in a strict reality.

As for Routh, I'm not really sure he has that big of a recognition factor among the general public. Most of the "general public" people I deal with on an everyday business dont even recognize the guy if he's not dressed as the part. If you're going for the "recognition with the general public" factor, then you're going to want Tom Welling who's been the face of Superman for the past 7 years, regardless of the tim,e in the character's life he's actually playing.

ApologistPuncher said...

"WB's may actually stay with him because it's an actor that people already recognize as Superman for a sequel, and he wasn't the problem with SR among the general audience and critics. Plus if you are going to have CB in the movie then it would make sense to have the already established Superman in the movie as well."

Uh, what "people"?? You Apolgosists are NOT the majority. But you knew that...

And sorry, it would NOT make "sense" to bring his baggage along for THIS ride. Is Eric Bana in the new Hulk movie? No. And why? Because Hulk was a DISAPPOINTMENT.

Guess what Singerman Peeps was too??

swright said...

"And sorry, it would NOT make "sense" to bring his baggage along for THIS ride. Is Eric Bana in the new Hulk movie? No. And why? Because Hulk was a DISAPPOINTMENT."

Yeah, but The Hulk is being done 5 years after the other movie. IF they were to do this movie by 2009 (which is possible if it's being fast tracked) then it's a bit different situation.

I actually believe though if they really DO want to distance themselves from SR with this movie then they will recast. And I would love to see Tom Welling take on the role. This way it would force them to stop the show this year and move right into the movie.

colors said...

I'd be surprised if Routh is allowed back. To me, it's more likely that Welling or someone new would get the part. While I'd prefer Welling, SV has sucked so much lately that it may actually be worth it to scrap both Singerman and SV and start over again completely with a new actor.

The admin over at Batman On Film has sources at WB who, he says, have strongly implied that JLA is happening instead of TMOS. And he's a big Singerman fan so it's not good news for him. He's usually been pretty reliable with what he's been willing to talk about from his sources so I believe it.

Lastly, I think a continuity-agnostic Batman is the way to go for a JLA film. It *could* be the Nolan Batman... or maybe not. It should be made as clear as possible, however, that the guy in the red cape ain't Singerman (which should be easy to do, just give him a red cape).

ApologistPuncher said...

"IF they were to do this movie by 2009 (which is possible if it's being fast tracked)"

Which we know it isn't.

Anonymous said...

"You're logic is fucked again. They're clearly NOT going to wait...Singer's supposedly pitching his sequel and Horn has said he'll consider it, whereas the momentum behind a JLA film just keeps on snowballing"

Snowballing what the hell are you talking about? So there have been a few rummors about a JL movie and WB looking for a director means the momentum is snowballing. No not hardly, most people have no clue about this proposed movie outside the comic book fans.

ApologistPuncher said...

"Snowballing what the hell are you talking about? So there have been a few rummors about a JL movie and WB looking for a director means the momentum is snowballing. No not hardly, most people have no clue about this proposed movie outside the comic book fans."

There it is AGAIN, folks. The Apologist "logic" at work.

They live their lives based on RUMORS of a Singerman sequel, yet shoot down OTHER FILMS as "just rumors" when it counters their "beliefs". But here's something these fucking morons aren't considering: There is ALREADY A JLA SCRIPT. Singerman Returns From Returning? Not a fucking page.

What does it all mean? It means: Fuck you, Apologist shitbags!

Anonymous said...

"They live their lives based on RUMORS of a Singerman sequel, yet shoot down OTHER FILMS as "just rumors" when it counters their "beliefs". But here's something these fucking morons aren't considering: There is ALREADY A JLA SCRIPT. Singerman Returns From Returning? Not a fucking page.

What does it all mean? It means: Fuck you, Apologist shitbags!"

Who the fuck is this ASSHOLE?? I am not pimping SR retard i did not like IT!! I want WB to wait a few years and do Superman all over again with a REBOOT!! This is not going to work are you kiddig me or what? This movie has cheesy written all over it. WB wants the director of Happy Feet and BABE do do this give me a break. Why because he did Road Warrior a 100 years ago they think he can do this. If this fails then we will not see Superman for god knows how long, WB should wait a few years, reboot Superman and if it is a smash then think about a JL movie. Superman's popularity in the movies is in the toilet right now thanks to Singer and the other DC characters other than Batman are secondary characters in the DC world at best that will be in the movie. You go into a movie like this with Superman at his peak not at an all time low like he is now. Don't call me an apologist ever again DICKHEAD, i HATED SR and Singer Sucks.

ApologistPuncher said...

"Who the fuck is this ASSHOLE?? I am not pimping SR retard i did not like IT!! I want WB to wait a few years and do Superman all over again with a REBOOT!! This is not going to work are you kiddig me or what? This movie has cheesy written all over it. WB wants the director of Happy Feet and BABE do do this give me a break. Why because he did Road Warrior a 100 years ago they think he can do this. If this fails then we will not see Superman for god knows how long, WB should wait a few years, reboot Superman and if it is a smash then think about a JL movie. Superman's popularity in the movies is in the toilet right now thanks to Singer and the other DC characters other than Batman are secondary characters in the DC world at best that will be in the movie. You go into a movie like this with Superman at his peak not at an all time low like he is now. Don't call me an apologist ever again DICKHEAD, i HATED SR and Singer Sucks."

Flipping the script AFTER a verbal beating, Apologist bitch? Read what YOU wrote and tell me it's not the ramblings of an APOLOGIST.

Jesus, this piece of shit rants just like REtard.

Anonymous said...

Folks do not associate Routh as Supes at best they associate him as a second rate knock off of Reeve or just don’t know who he is without the bad Singer fetish suit on.

Most people would probably identify Welling or Cain with or without the suit on as the modern day last son of Krypton.

Anonymous said...

"Flipping the script AFTER a verbal beating, Apologist bitch? Read what YOU wrote and tell me it's not the ramblings of an APOLOGIST.

Jesus, this piece of shit rants just like REtard."

ASSHOLE believe what you want i posted above about not wanting this JL movie before a Superman Reboot and i am confirming it again. I have yet to run into a SR fan that had a thing bad to say about Singer, Routh or that fucking movie so live in LA LA land if you must but i want a REBOOT!!!

Anonymous said...

You wont see Bale in the JLA movie. The whole concept of the JLA undermines the entire premise of Nolan's Batman world which is grounded in a strict reality.
^^^

The question is would they even be allowed to use Batman for a big screen Justice League film. Correct me if I’m wrong but this is the same situation that Smallville had when they wanted Wayne to appear in a couple episodes this past season but because the other studio that was splitting the tab with Time Warner on the Batman Begins project not allowing Smallville use of the character they weren’t able to and had to switch to the Green Arrow instead.


As for Bale donning the Bat suit in a JLA film, at this point in his career the guy has too much integrity as an actor to whore himself like that, let’s just say you won’t find Bale at Boonies comic cons hawking his autograph as Batman like Routh, who at this point will do any project with or without Singer which requries him to don the red undies again.

ApologistPuncher said...

"ASSHOLE believe what you want i posted above about not wanting this JL movie before a Superman Reboot and i am confirming it again. I have yet to run into a SR fan that had a thing bad to say about Singer, Routh or that fucking movie so live in LA LA land if you must but i want a REBOOT!!!"

No one cares what YOU want, douchebag. Most of us here will take ANY OTHER version of Supes, rather than a Singerman sequel. How fucking stupid do you have to be to try to squash a potentially BETTER film, and HELP get a sequel made??

THAT is why I DO think you are an Apologist bitch trying to stir shit up....

Anonymous said...

"i want a REBOOT!!! "
^^^
HELL YEAH!

Anonymous said...

It's hard to overstate how badly Singer's movie screwed up the DC universe on film. If they recast Routh as Superman, they run the risk of associating the new JL film with the piece of garbage that is "Superman Returns." If they recast, they have to spend lots of time and money auditioning and casting a role again, even though they just went through this process trying to find the right actor for Superman just a few years ago.

Singer's movie failed on so many levels that Warner Bros. has its hands full just trying to launch a follow-up.

-CK

ApologistPuncher said...

"Well you are a fanboy so i bet you don't watch sports. Too busy wacking off all day and picking up your unemployment check. You have to put the competition into the right context. HUH is right on your lame ass points. SR made over 200 mil at the BO so because those films made more that means it is because they are better. TF beat the shit out of BB bo does that mean it is better? All those films you named would have done even more than they did had they not been around such tough competition this summer. You want shitty BO results compared to competiton. Look at BB in the Summer of 05. It was up against next to nothing and it made 371 mil WW that is nothing to be impressed with."

"Who the fuck is this ASSHOLE?? I am not pimping SR retard i did not like IT!! I want WB to wait a few years and do Superman all over again with a REBOOT!! This is not going to work are you kiddig me or what? This movie has cheesy written all over it. WB wants the director of Happy Feet and BABE do do this give me a break. Why because he did Road Warrior a 100 years ago they think he can do this. If this fails then we will not see Superman for god knows how long, WB should wait a few years, reboot Superman and if it is a smash then think about a JL movie. Superman's popularity in the movies is in the toilet right now thanks to Singer and the other DC characters other than Batman are secondary characters in the DC world at best that will be in the movie. You go into a movie like this with Superman at his peak not at an all time low like he is now. Don't call me an apologist ever again DICKHEAD, i HATED SR and Singer Sucks."

Anyone ELSE see the similarities here?

Anonymous said...

"As for Bale donning the Bat suit in a JLA film, at this point in his career the guy has too much integrity as an actor to whore himself like that, let’s just say you won’t find Bale at Boonies comic cons hawking his autograph as Batman like Routh, who at this point will do any project with or without Singer which requries him to don the red undies again"

Yeah with Bale you get the feeling that the guy would want to walk away from the Batman series if Nolon somehow got the boot.
Which is not the case with Routh who is just so desperate for more Singerman with or without Singer.

Anonymous said...

"Anyone ELSE see the similarities here?"

I got better things to do with my time than misrepresent myself on a BLOG. Clearly you don't but when i say something i mean it. The fact that you are coming at me when we both hated SR makes no sense at all.

ApologistPuncher said...

"If they recast, they have to spend lots of time and money auditioning and casting a role again, even though they just went through this process trying to find the right actor for Superman just a few years ago."

Actually, this is a non-issue. As long as THIS director doesn't cast with his cock, it'll be pretty smooth.

And ANYONE who doesn't believe "attraction" played a part in BS' decision to cast Routh is DELUSIONAL.

Anonymous said...

"No one cares what YOU want, douchebag. Most of us here will take ANY OTHER version of Supes, rather than a Singerman sequel. How fucking stupid do you have to be to try to squash a potentially BETTER film, and HELP get a sequel made??"

Because it is not going to be a great film in my opinion. I am a Superman fan first. If this get made over SR sequel yeah i will be happy because they are not going on with Singer. However and i will say it again. A REBOOT makes more sense in a few years and if done right will be a huge hit and then you do a JL movie. That is my take on this, i don't care if you believe me or not. Tha fact that i am saying i hate SR and i want a reboot and you are calling me a liar tells me you spend way too much time here.

ApologistPuncher said...

"Tha fact that i am saying i hate SR and i want a reboot and you are calling me a liar tells me you spend way too much time here."

Yeah, the fact that REtard was proclaiming a "victory" over me because I WASN'T posting on here much proves how CORRECT you are, huh?

If you ARE a Superman fan, DON'T campaign AGAINST a different interpretation of the character WITHOUT knowing what the film will be about.

That is what people call "cutting off your nose to spite your face".

Anonymous said...

"If you ARE a Superman fan, DON'T campaign AGAINST a different interpretation of the character WITHOUT knowing what the film will be about.

That is what people call "cutting off your nose to spite your face"."

It is not about SUPERMAN it is a JL movie, with the director of BABE and Happy Feet oh yeah that sounds great. Superman fans first want a reboot to see him done the right way not a JL movie where he is one of many heroes.

ApologistPuncher said...

"It is not about SUPERMAN it is a JL movie, with the director of BABE and Happy Feet oh yeah that sounds great. Superman fans first want a reboot to see him done the right way not a JL movie where he is one of many heroes."

Jesus, I'm done wasting my time on you. Just because YOU only want a reboot, doesn't mean you speak for REAL Superman fans. Just like in ANY incarnation, if Superman is involved, he is the FOCUS.

And I'm sure EVERYONE figured Sam Raimi could do Spiderman with a big budget, after having made low-budget horror comedies, huh?

Anonymous said...

"Jesus, I'm done wasting my time on you. Just because YOU only want a reboot, doesn't mean you speak for REAL Superman fans. Just like in ANY incarnation, if Superman is involved, he is the FOCUS."

No try again i did not say i only want a reboot i said to me that is best choice to make. This JL movie while a better idea than any SR sequel is a go for broke idea that if it fails WB is essentially fucked in terms of making comic movies.

ApologistPuncher said...

"This JL movie while a better idea than any SR sequel is a go for broke idea that if it fails WB is essentially fucked in terms of making comic movies."

This makes absolutely NO sense, as WB owns ALL OF DC COMICS, but whatever.

We're getting a JLA movie, and I'm confident it will be better than Singerman Peeps. That's good enough for me.

Anonymous said...

"This makes absolutely NO sense, as WB owns ALL OF DC COMICS, but whatever."

How does that make no sense? If they do a JL movie with all the major DC heroes in it many of which have never been in a movie of their own before and it bombs than you can kiss any of those other characters being in movies again for a long time. Don't you get it this is a go for broke idea for WB. If it is a hit then they can spin off other movies, if it is a failure they are screwed.

ApologistPuncher said...

"How does that make no sense? If they do a JL movie with all the major DC heroes in it many of which have never been in a movie of their own before and it bombs than you can kiss any of those other characters being in movies again for a long time. Don't you get it this is a go for broke idea for WB. If it is a hit then they can spin off other movies, if it is a failure they are screwed."

No son, YOU don't "get it".

This is NOT a "go for broke idea". It is an idea to launch new franchises. If in your head you think WB is saying "All or nothing, if it doesn't work we won't try to make money off of these characters EVER again", you need to wise-up. No one is FORCING WB to do this, no one is saying "Or else!". WB is in charge of WB. As long as $$ can be made off of these charactwers, it WILL BE.

Man, and I thought it was difficult trying to "reason" with JUST the Apologists.....

Anonymous said...

"This is NOT a "go for broke idea". It is an idea to launch new franchises. If in your head you think WB is saying "All or nothing, if it doesn't work we won't try to make money off of these characters EVER again","

You are just rehasing stuff that i already said. I said if it works they can spin off new movies. If they spend a lot of money on this with all the DC heroes in one movie and it fails you honestly think WB will just shrug it off and say "Ah no big deal lets get right to work on a new Superman movie or the Flash". It is almost a lock that those things would be backburnered for a long time if JL fails.

ApologistPuncher said...

"You are just rehasing stuff that i already said. I said if it works they can spin off new movies. If they spend a lot of money on this with all the DC heroes in one movie and it fails you honestly think WB will just shrug it off and say "Ah no big deal lets get right to work on a new Superman movie or the Flash". It is almost a lock that those things would be backburnered for a long time if JL fails."

I've had enough of you. Come back when you grow some intelligence, ok? And learn how to read and comprehend as well. "Rehashing" what you said? Sorry, I make sense.

A "lock"?? My god, some people just don't KNOW how DENSE they are.

Anonymous said...

^^

So you are essentially saying that if JL fails WB will have no problem going ahead right away with other DC movies even though they were just in a huge movie together and it was a flop. How does that make sense at all?? Wait WB now is not the time, Reboot Superman first, JL later but not now.

ApologistPuncher said...

So, where is REtard lately? I like abusing him, as I don't pity THAT unintelligent bastard......

ApologistPuncher said...

"So you are essentially saying that if JL fails WB will have no problem going ahead right away with other DC movies even though they were just in a huge movie together and it was a flop. How does that make sense at all?? Wait WB now is not the time, Reboot Superman first, JL later but not now."

This is the LAST time I respond to you, as trying to "educate" you gives me a headache...

First off, learn how to comprehend what someone is saying, not just ASSUME it is only "black and white".

Secondly, it WON'T "flop", so it's not a concern.

Finally, Singerman DID flop, and yet we have a BRAND NEW animated movie coming out in a month, and a JLA film that will CENTER on him going to be made soon. WB knows these characters equal money, and they won't IMMEDIATELY greenlight films for them, but they won't "shelve them" long-term like your REtarded "doom & gloom" scenario paints.

Soak up some knowledge, kid. Don't be a REtard clone.

Anonymous said...

"Secondly, it WON'T "flop", so it's not a concern."

Nobody thought SR was going to flop last summer so that is a dumb quote.

"WB knows these characters equal money, and they won't IMMEDIATELY greenlight films for them, but they won't "shelve them" long-term like your REtarded "doom & gloom" scenario paints."

Yeah your right they will spend 200 plus mil on a JL movie, have it fail after the failure of SR mind you and still be all overjoyed about making comic movies.

Anonymous said...

AP you really need to get a life. It seems that you have been arguing with yourself the last few posts. Since this site loves posting rumors I will post one I just heard that a rough draft is complete. This only reaffirms that...............

In 2009 SSS and AP shoot themselves when Superman opens.

rEstart

I never said WB will shelf anything. What I said AP is that WB would be a fool to walk away from superman. Hopefully WB wont film the housebraker loser smallville superman anyway. Clue for smallville 7th season : "Clark lays the mack daddy on dead lana corpse."hmmm no wonder AP loves it

ApologistPuncher said...

"AP you really need to get a life. It seems that you have been arguing with yourself the last few posts. Since this site loves posting rumors I will post one I just heard that a rough draft is complete. This only reaffirms that...............

In 2009 SSS and AP shoot themselves when Superman opens.

rEstart

I never said WB will shelf anything. What I said AP is that WB would be a fool to walk away from superman. Hopefully WB wont film the housebraker loser smallville superman anyway. Clue for smallville 7th season : "Clark lays the mack daddy on dead lana corpse."hmmm no wonder AP loves it"

Hey, look! I ask for a ladyboy bitch, and he does as I command!! Dance, you fucking retarded bitch, DANCE!

See, I make a point about there being NO SIngerman script, so OF COURSE this shitbird has to MAKE-UP a LIE to try to counter it. Sorry, you salad-tossing mental midget, it doesn't work like that.

And HERE is the proof that bitch above WAS REtard:

"I never said WB will shelf anything."

God, sometimes it is difficult being as intelligent as I am. I said it was an Apologist bitch playing games, and I am vindicated.

It explains why these "two" were so similar in their fucking STUPIDITY....

Anonymous said...

"It is not about SUPERMAN it is a JL movie, with the director of BABE and Happy Feet oh yeah that sounds great."

Typical, no fuckin idea.

George Miller's been around for a while, with an impressive body of work to his name. Look him up dickhead, don't make the guy sound like a kid's film director.

Ever notice how this guy has to drag everything down to Singer's level? What's the usual next step for the apologists? Oh yeah, start rubbishing Smallvile.......whadda you mean ReTard's already done that?

And YES, it does appear that the JLA is being fast tracked. Deal with it!

Remember,
There's plenty of smokin hot women in Smallville!
Father Finian Egan

ApologistPuncher said...

Bless you father, for REtard has sinned....

See how PATHETIC he is? He actually PRETENDS to be "one of us", then he sticks BS' foot in his ass and let's slip the "truth". This isn't the first time, either.

Hey Apologists, want to know how BS' ass smells? Take a whiff of REtards breath.....

Anonymous said...

"See how PATHETIC he is?"

Well done there AP, btw.

In his other guise I think he's the cry baby who reckons Reeve's career is comparable to Wouth's. He goes on and on about shit that doesn't hold water. Yep, there's that trend again

Nuff said
Father Finian

Anonymous said...

"Well done there AP, btw.

In his other guise I think he's the cry baby who reckons Reeve's career is comparable to Wouth's. He goes on and on about shit that doesn't hold water. Yep, there's that trend again

Nuff said
Father Finian"

Let me understand this i have to agree that i want a JL movie or i am a liar. you guys are nuts. I want a Reboot and guess what look at the blog so does SSS. Superman getting shafted in a JL movie is not what i had in mind. Reboot him in a few years and if they get a director who knows Superman, i mean the comic Superman it will be a huge hit. Singer only cared about Donner's Superman this can be fixed but we need a visionary director on Superman who sees the big picture. From now on this is my sign off,

SUPERMANREBOOT for 2009

Anyone who claims otherwise is pretending to be me.

Anonymous said...

I doubt there'll be any kind of superman film in 2009. Best wait a while longer so the piece of shit singer gave us will be long forgotten. Personally id like to see warners re-release Donners original for the 30th anniversary next year. Take a cue from the star wars special editions circa 1997 recut it a bit (i.e cut the turning back time sequence) and re do some effects and not only would you recoup the money singer lost but you would also reintroduce the character to the new generation without having to spend $200 million. Follow it up with a new cut of Donners2 in 2010, with the turning back time bit removed (leaving it it open) and then get ready for a new movie in 2013. Supermans 75th birthday! Oh and incase youre wondering, the only thing the new films should keep from Donners era is the opening/closing and of course John Williams music. Nothing else. Otherwise you turn into a talentless waste of space like singer.

Anonymous said...

All
I see how stupid you losers are. SSS do something useful and bring out the IP stamps to show I only post like this.........

Singer Vision Returns in 2009!

Restart

AP/father I really dont care what you believe. Since A) for months this site has predicted Singer off the project and he is not. B) Your homophobic remarks prove how much you love man's cock. C) Body of work does a good film make.....Howard the Duck anyone or how about Maximum Overdrive by Steven King. D)I know a rough draft of script is out there. E) Other then Horns words he is waiting for a script there has been NO FIRM RUMORS this project is dead.

Anonymous said...

Singer will not return! I will make sure of that. & if there is a rough draft out there like you claim there is, why dont you do somthing usefull and get a hold of it? Jackass! No singerman in 2009 unless youre having a wet dream.

Anonymous said...

"C) Body of work does a good film make.....Howard the Duck anyone or how about Maximum Overdrive by Steven King." Retard

Or how about "Superman Returns"

What a fuckhead

ApologistPuncher said...

"AP/father I really dont care what you believe. Since A) for months this site has predicted Singer off the project and he is not."

You know, it really is fucking PATHETIC, the way these Apologist bitches work.

This breathing shit-crust goes on and on about how there IS going to be a sequel, for "months and months" and yet there is NO announcement of a sequel being greenlit. Then, he turns around and says "they haven't announced they kicked him off YET so YOU'RE wrong". Want to know what that is? It is a CHILD'S LOGIC. Not that of a fully-functioning adult, a fucking preteen child.

And guess what? BS likes them young and dumb, so this means LOTS of salad-tossing for THAT Apologist ladyboy.....

Anonymous said...

Wow the ammount of anger in this blog is insane. Looks like deep in all of your hearts you know I am right otherwise you would just ignore me. As for the draft I am working on getting a copy that i can link to this page, but this may not be possible...........

Back in 2009!

Restart

AP what you didnt call me "lady boy" once. That hurt my feelings :-(

Anonymous said...

I don't think there will ever be an announcement that Singer is "off the project." You can't be kicked off a project that doesn't exist. As of now, there is no Superman Returns sequel.

I don't think these companies announce when something is not going to happen, like "Paramount has announced that Emmanuel Lewis will not play Captain Kirk in the new Star Trek film." No reason to announce it since it's not going to happen.

- CK

ApologistPuncher said...

"And guess what? BS likes them young and dumb, so this means LOTS of salad-tossing for THAT Apologist ladyboy....."

"AP what you didnt call me "lady boy" once. That hurt my feelings :-("

Well, we knew he couldn't SPELL, but who knew he couldn't READ too?

You know, his bullshit has gone WAY past "tiresome" now. It's obivous this fudge-packing moron KNOWS there WON'T be a sequel, but just comes here to be a little BITCH. Anyone who recognizes this turd exists will just fuel more REtarded ass-ramblings.

So I say this now, so it's clear to ALL: I won't be responding to REtard EVER again, as I have knocked his sissy ass out countless times already. There just comes a time when trying to "reason" with a fucking mongoloid becomes akin to banging your head against the wall. Accomplishes nothing.

I WILL continue to verbally bitch-slap all the other Apologists who make their way over here from BlueNuts and SingermanHomoPage, but as of this time REtard has been DISSED & DISMISSED.

Fuck off, ladyboy.

Anonymous said...

"I WILL continue to verbally bitch-slap all the other Apologists who make their way over here from BlueNuts and SingermanHomoPage, but as of this time REtard has been DISSED & DISMISSED."

Why do you continue to taunt him. He is just going to come back and say no, i owned you bitch or something like that.

I hope they get Welling in this, maybe he will put the suit on for a big payday that is if Smallville does not get in the way. You guys get a laod of the chick playing Supergirl in Smallvile, God DAMN!!!

Anonymous said...

"You guys get a laod of the chick playing Supergirl in Smallvile, God DAMN!!!"

Yeah, I know.

Apologists aren't interested in women though. Just Bryan Singer and Bwandon Wouth(who?).

Father Finian

Anonymous said...

"As for the draft I am working on getting a copy that i can link to this page, but this may not be possible..........." Retard

...you mean if you can finish it, and correct all my usual tell tale poor spelling and grammar.

What a fuckhead.

colors said...

"As for Bale donning the Bat suit in a JLA film, at this point in his career the guy has too much integrity as an actor to whore himself like that"
Integrity?! Have you SEEN the guy's pre-Begins resume? Before he was cast as Batman, you probably could've hired him to dress up as a clown and appear at your kid's birthday party.

"Strict reality" my ass, the minute a guy in a cape comes on the screen, "reality" just went out the window. WB wants Batman in this movie, so Bale or not, they're gonna use him.

Anonymous said...

^Nobody said Batman wont be in the JLA movie. I said Bale's Batman wont be in that movie because his world isnt a hyper-reality where alien races, amazonian princesses, the speedforce, and power rings exist. The whole premise of Batman Begins was to put Batman in a "strict reality" and show how that one fantastical element could occur in a real world setting. That's why they went into detail for the first 40 minutes of the movie explaining his motives and training, and showing how each and every aspect of Batman came together.

dbss80 said...

Unless a JL movie is 12 hrs long with 2 intermissions it will be a joke. This will just be an action movie nothing more nothing less. Take all the fanboy whining that you got about SR, FF, GR and The Hulk and times that by about a thousand and that is what will come of JL.

ApologistPuncher said...

"Unless a JL movie is 12 hrs long with 2 intermissions it will be a joke. This will just be an action movie nothing more nothing less. Take all the fanboy whining that you got about SR, FF, GR and The Hulk and times that by about a thousand and that is what will come of JL."

No, that's what you WANT to happen, you Apologist moron.

Anyone who THINKS this movie will have ANY of the fuck-ups Singerman had is OBVIOUSLY an idiot.

Anonymous said...

Singer is a FAG and Superman Returns was gay.

dbss80 said...

"No, that's what you WANT to happen, you Apologist moron.

Anyone who THINKS this movie will have ANY of the fuck-ups Singerman had is OBVIOUSLY an idiot."

Is that right then by all means explain to me how a JL movie will satisfy a crazy amount of fanbases in a 2 hr and 20 min or so movie? I would love to hear how they intend to accomplish that. You see them having a great story and depth for all the heroes in that timeframe. If they leave out heroes from the main plot or push them into the background i am sure fanboys won't be too mad their heroes got shafted, we all know how logical they are.

ApologistPuncher said...

"Is that right then by all means explain to me how a JL movie will satisfy a crazy amount of fanbases in a 2 hr and 20 min or so movie? I would love to hear how they intend to accomplish that. You see them having a great story and depth for all the heroes in that timeframe. If they leave out heroes from the main plot or push them into the background i am sure fanboys won't be too mad their heroes got shafted, we all know how logical they are."

Sorry, genius, the ONLY type of "people" who are illogical are YOU Apologist sissies. Why not read over some of your "kind"'s posts on here, for example?

People will KNOW it's a JUSTICE LEAGUE MOVIE. NOT a Flash movie, NOT a Wonder Woman movie, a JUSTICE LEAGUE MOVIE.

I think it's FINALLY setting in with these mental-midgets. JL is coming, Singerman Returns From Brokeback Mountain NEVER WAS.

Fuck you, Apologist bitches!

dbss80 said...

"Sorry, genius, the ONLY type of "people" who are illogical are YOU Apologist sissies. Why not read over some of your "kind"'s posts on here, for example?

People will KNOW it's a JUSTICE LEAGUE MOVIE. NOT a Flash movie, NOT a Wonder Woman movie, a JUSTICE LEAGUE MOVIE.

I think it's FINALLY setting in with these mental-midgets. JL is coming, Singerman Returns From Brokeback Mountain NEVER WAS.

Fuck you, Apologist bitches!"

Well that answered nothing. When you have an answer to my question as to how they are going to fit all the DC JL heroes into one movie and satisfy all the fanbases by all means let me know. Not even attempting to make a point and just insulting someone does not win arguments.

ApologistPuncher said...

"Well that answered nothing. When you have an answer to my question as to how they are going to fit all the DC JL heroes into one movie and satisfy all the fanbases by all means let me know. Not even attempting to make a point and just insulting someone does not win arguments."

It doesn't matter if YOU think it "answered nothing". YOU are a fucking moron, so comprehension will NEVER be your strong suit.

Fucking Apologists ALWAYS think it's "all or nothing". They don't have to satisy "all the fanbases", shit-brick. They just need to satisy MOST. What you fucking gimps fail to realize is, SIngerman Returns ALIENATED the CORE fanbase. A mistake WB will NOT allow happen again.

Once again: Fuck you Apologist bitch!

dbss80 said...

So lets review.

Burton with Batman
Schumacher with Batman
Singer with Superman
Ratner with X-Men
Lester with Superman
Lee with The Hulk
Tim Story with Fantastic Four
Mark Steven Johnson with Ghost Rider

Just to name a few all failed to unite a fanbase when it comes to one character, just one. However whoever directs this movie will easily unite fanbases in a JL movie for as many as 7 DC heroes and that is just the original lineup. Who is directing this thing Jesus Christ himself??

ApologistPuncher said...

"Burton with Batman"

"Lester with Superman"

Hey, lame ass, these two DID appease MOST of the fanbase with at least ONE movie. Superman II was a BLOCKBUSTER, and the first BATMAN movie was a world-wide PHENOMENON.

Just because you're a sissy bitch who ONLY wants a Singerman sequel, doesn't mean this film will "fail". I GUARANTEE it will be EXPONENTIALLY more successful than BS' abortion. Whether YOU want it to or not.

And do some research, shit for brains. The movie will NOT focus on 7 characters, it will FOCUS on the main 4, possibly 5. The majority of people aren't brainless fuck-wits like YOU and your ILK. They will NOT go into a JLA movie EXPECTING it to be all about their favorite character ONLY.

Get a fucking clue, you Apologist salad-tosser.

dbss80 said...

"And do some research, shit for brains. The movie will NOT focus on 7 characters, it will FOCUS on the main 4, possibly 5. The majority of people aren't brainless fuck-wits like YOU and your ILK. They will NOT go into a JLA movie EXPECTING it to be all about their favorite character ONLY."

And what proof do you have of that other than internet rumors suggesting that is the case? Have you seen the script first hand? If the answer is no then your assertion that it's focus on just 4 or 5 is BOGUS and based on nothing. Even if that is true i gave you a bunch of examples of directors that failed with one comic hero and you think this will be a homerun for a director working maybe as many as 4 or 5 in the movie but probably more. What makes you argument even dumber is you don't even know who the director will be if anyone at all. Superman had how many scripts tossed and directors that came and went in the last 10 years??

Anonymous said...

A-ROD hit his 500th HR today YEAH GO YANKEES!!!!

Anonymous said...

^^

LOL, What the fuck!!

ApologistPuncher said...

"And what proof do you have of that other than internet rumors suggesting that is the case? Have you seen the script first hand? If the answer is no then your assertion that it's focus on just 4 or 5 is BOGUS and based on nothing. Even if that is true i gave you a bunch of examples of directors that failed with one comic hero and you think this will be a homerun for a director working maybe as many as 4 or 5 in the movie but probably more. What makes you argument even dumber is you don't even know who the director will be if anyone at all. Superman had how many scripts tossed and directors that came and went in the last 10 years??"

Hey, everyone! This fucking gimp is NOW trying to use OUR assertion for NO Singerman sequel! HE wants to say its' "just rumors" of a JLA movie?? What have WE said about the Singerman sequel again? See how fucking STUPID these bitches are??

And for your info, you shit-sucking waste of space, there IS a director being "courted" for the project. When the official announcement comes down shortly, you fucking sissy-boys will have to console each other over on BlueNuts or SingermanHomoPage. Tossed-salad all around!!

Anonymous said...

"Singer is a FAG and Superman Returns was gay."

I don't know who this guy is, but he speaks the word of the Lord,

Brandon Routh(who?)is a sin,
Father Finian Egan

Anonymous said...

"Who is directing this thing Jesus Christ himself??"

No, he's unavailable so they're looking at George Miller. Do try and keep up.

Father Finian Egan

Anonymous said...

"When you have an answer to my question as to how they are going to fit all the DC JL heroes into one movie and satisfy all the fanbases by all means let me know"

Just because it's beyond YOUR level of understanding or imagination.....and it's just another apologist strawman argument..so fuck off!

....and how about satisfying the filmgoing public? You know it is possible in this day and age to make an entertaining superhero movie. Christ the amount of characters both good and bad in Spidey3 was huge yet still made for an entertaining HIT picture.

AP's right on the money again. You whining fuckin Singersuckers would rather another doomed trip to Singerland than the chance to see DC's finest together on the big screen! Talk about a lack of plain old common sense

Justice League Padre,
Father Finian Egan

Christ, even swright can see the logic in going down the JLA path! And good on him!

dbss80 said...

It is so obvious that AP and Father are the same guy.

ApologistPuncher said...

"It is so obvious that AP and Father are the same guy."

There it is again. The Apologist has to try to use the SAME insult or argument that was lobbed against THEM, and in a PUSSIFIED manner try to "turn it around" on us.

Hey, you fucking shit-eating sissy boy, show some examples of similar posting styles, or even PUNCTUATION. I have PROVEN you Apologist cunts do that ALL THE TIME, let's see you do the SAME.

You can't, because you're a fucking ignorant pussy-fart. Fuck off, Apologist bitch!

Anonymous said...

"It is so obvious that AP and Father are the same guy."

Yeah right. Typical, no fuckin idea. So fuckin ignorant that they can't even bring themselves to think that there's a lot of people who hate Singer's fucked up vision of a fag Superman. That's what you get for being a sheep and believing the crap that people like Younis dish out.

Sheep, just fuckin sheep.

Father Finian Egan/Terminal

Yes, Father Finian and Terminal are the same person, me! You come to expect apologists making grand statements with no basis in fact though

dbss80 said...

"You can't, because you're a fucking ignorant pussy-fart. Fuck off, Apologist bitch!"

Your mother must be very proud, or did you fuck her too??

Anonymous said...

"You can't, because you're a fucking ignorant pussy-fart. Fuck off, Apologist bitch!"

Your mother must be very proud, or did you fuck her too??"dbss80

Apologist strawman shit again.

Typical, no fuckin idea

Remember,
Bryan Singer is a sinner
Father Finian Egan

dbss80 said...

"Apologist strawman shit again."

You just further confirmed that you guys are the same person. I post that and you defend him again.

Anonymous said...

"You just further confirmed that you guys are the same person. I post that and you defend him again."

...and you just further confirmed you are a fuckin retard.

Believe it or not, more than one person thinks you're full of shit, fuckwit. Get used to it, you're going to meet a hell of a lot of people as you bumble through life that are also going to think you are a fuckwit.

Father

Anonymous said...

Wow with inflation as it stands these 2007 movies (live free die hard, hairspray, Evan Almighty, etc.) still have not grossed or will gross as much as Superman Returns. With money like that WB will bring ....................

Superman back in 2009!

Reatart

Look it up I am right! Even the haters can't deny that.

Anonymous said...

that's how pathetic it's become for you now ReTard? You're using Hairspray as a basis for comparison? I really think you've reached the end of the line my friend.

Anonymous said...

Neither Live Free or Die Hard or Hairspray was expected to be a massive blockbuster. Superman Returns was.

Evan Almighty was expected to do well, and it bombed. But that doesn't have anything to do with Superman. It just shows that some movies do better than others at the box office. The bottom line is that Returns disappointed critically and commercially, and that's why we probably won't see a Singerman sequel.

- CK

ApologistPuncher said...

"You just further confirmed that you guys are the same person. I post that and you defend him again."

Either show some proof, shit nugget, or shut the fuck up.

Does it feel bad when the "bigger kids" beat the shit out of you, sissy?

ApologistPuncher said...

Hey, did anyone see that Live Free or Die Hard, which cost $110 million to make, has grossed $130 million in the US ALONE, and $308 million worldwide?

Now THAT is a successful film right there...

ApologistPuncher said...

Can you believe some fucking REtard over at BlueNuts is trying to start a lame-ass "rumor" of talking to that little bitch Dougherty?? I guess all the stories about the JLA film moving forward has made those Apologist sissies DESPERATE.

The fact ANYONE would believe this douche just "spotted" a fucktard like Dougherty and "chatted" with them is LAME. I can't WAIT for WB to officially announce the JLA film is in pre-production, and see all the Apologists kick it into "whine mode"....

Anonymous said...

Look it up I am right! Even the haters can't deny that" Retard

Hey fuckwit, what a lame comparison.

You must think everyone's as retarded as you are. Why not compare the gross from films in the same genre as Returns? Films like "Spidey3", "Simpsons" "Transformers" all of which SHIT ALL OVER your beloved gayfest.

How stupid are these apologists, comparing Returns to comedies, that's why

JLA flies in 2009!

Father Finian the Restart hater

Anonymous said...

"Can you believe some fucking REtard over at BlueNuts is trying to start a lame-ass "rumor" of talking to that little bitch Dougherty??"

It's interesting to note the amount of indifference the "news" has been met with on that particular forum.

Of course on SHP it's seen by the blind Younis sheep there as some sort of confirmation yet again.

The fatal flaw with the potential sequel idea is to bring back Gay Spacey's Luthor to "thrill" audiences. As if Wouth and Bosworth being onboard weren't enough to sink it.

Oh, the mediocrity!

Father Finian

.....notice the only real media buzz about live action Supes at the moment is all about Smallville and/or the potential JLA film? Singer's franchise (of one film)is conspicuous by it's (deliberate) absence......

You can pick up the Returns DVD very cheap for the kids I 'spose, if you need to punish them or get them sleepy and ready for bed.

Anonymous said...

.....actually, introducing kids to Smallville's not a bad thing as it demonstrates a heterosexual take on the Superman mythos.

We've all heard the stories a thousand times about children seeing Singerman Returns and then joining ballet classes, wanting to wear bright and funny looking clothes and listening to dance music.

Parents beware, as news breaks that Spacey's Luthor will be joined by a second villian, Elton John as Zod.

Anonymous said...

OK
Returns last year ($400 million)
Simpsons right now ($235 million)

Simpsons will now finish above 400 million world wide proving my point that oversaturated market really hit returns.
Both Spiderman 3 and Transformers do not have any live action TV shows to suck money out of the theater.
I Believe that if WB cut cold turkey on Superman it would have made 700M worldwide. I also.......

Believe a man can fly in 2009!

Restart

I am so good it hurts

Anonymous said...

"Simpsons will now finish above 400 million" should be not.

Supes in 2009!

REstart

see I can even correct my mistakes dam I am good.

Anonymous said...

Retard where is the correlation between the two? You keep making the same stupid claim that a TV show impacts movie box office, but yet you've offered no evidence to support it? And you also waffle back and forth about what the Simpsons's box office means, and for some reason keep trying to tie it to Singerman's box office. Your sad, incoherent ramblings almost make me feel bad for you...almost.

Anonymous said...

"The fact ANYONE would believe this douche just "spotted" a fucktard like Dougherty and "chatted" with them is LAME."

Actually he did meet him. He had a picture to prove that accompanied the post. But as someone already said, he was roundly attacked because was a "hater" on the forum but when he ran into Dougherty he kissed his butt.

Anonymous said...

The correlation:
Simpsons reruns in most markets on twice a day.
Superman in most markets on twice to three times a day.

Therefore, the over exposure hurt both movies, but because Superman Returns was a good movie and a great charcter it did make more globally then the Simpson did.

Supes in 2009!

Restart

I wasnt even insulting once.

ApologistPuncher said...

This is for those of us with a fucking BRAIN.

Here's the numbers for the Simpsons movie:

Domestic Total as of Aug. 6, 2007: $132,029,148

Not bad, eh? Now here's the REAL important part:

In Release: 11 days / 1.6 weeks

11 DAYS?? So, there are actually morons out there that think this WON'T surpass Singerman at the BO??

It's a new LOW for the Apologist sissies today folks....

ApologistPuncher said...

One more FACT that I should have added:

Production Budget: $75 million

As I've stated NUMEROUS times before with other movies, THIS is all that matters: The Simpsons movie is ALREADY MORE PROFITABLE THAN SINGERMAN.

Once again, this is for purposes of information for the INTELLIGENT here. That is all.....

Anonymous said...

"11 DAYS?? So, there are actually morons out there that think this WON'T surpass Singerman at the BO??"

Domestically no it won't. It dropped 65% in it's 2nd weekend no chance at 200 mil domestic. 185 mil tops it will hit domestic.

ApologistPuncher said...

"Domestically no it won't. It dropped 65% in it's 2nd weekend no chance at 200 mil domestic. 185 mil tops it will hit domestic."

If given 18 WEEKS, it would no doubt surpass $200 million domestic. Fortunately for FOX, they won't feel the need to drag the carcass of a "dead" film around for that long.

WB? Had NO choice....

Anonymous said...

"If given 18 WEEKS, it would no doubt surpass $200 million domestic. Fortunately for FOX, they won't feel the need to drag the carcass of a "dead" film around for that long."

The reason SR was around so long is because it was still doing well in the I-Max theatres. Regular theatres it was done but the I-Max was still going good.

ApologistPuncher said...

"The reason SR was around so long is because it was still doing well in the I-Max theatres. Regular theatres it was done but the I-Max was still going good."

Save your Apologist "spin" for BlueNuts.

The last few weeks were for a "dollar theater" bump, NOTHING more. They were hoping to squeeze every CENT out of that stink-bomb.

Anonymous said...

"Save your Apologist "spin" for BlueNuts.

The last few weeks were for a "dollar theater" bump, NOTHING more. They were hoping to squeeze every CENT out of that stink-bomb."

I am not spinning anything the film was not a major hit there is no getting around that. However you info is not accurate. Look it up the film was still doing well in I-Max which is why it was around well after it was done in regular theatres. All major releases get a dollar theatre bump as well look it up.

colors said...

Simpsons reruns in most markets on twice a day.
Superman in most markets on twice to three times a day.

Therefore, the over exposure hurt both movies, but because Superman Returns was a good movie and a great charcter it did make more globally then the Simpson did.
-----
You're like a broken record. I've said it a zillion times, Superman movies, shows and 'toons have been in **CONSTANT** (ie, unbroken, non-stop) production since 1987. None of 'em ever flopped because of overexposure so *WHY* did only Singerman experience the backlash? Why not any of the slew of previous programming? The easier answer to believe is that Singerman, well, sucked.

The Simpsons movie's performance speaks for itself... but even if it doesn't, AP does and he's right.

And Singerman 2 looks less and less likely with each passing day...

swright said...

"Save your Apologist "spin" for BlueNuts."

Uhhhhh... AP... everyone on this site that hates the movie, even SSS, has said it only reached 200 million because of IMAX.

Anonymous said...

"Uhhhhh... AP... everyone on this site that hates the movie, even SSS, has said it only reached 200 million because of IMAX."

He is the same guy that said that Ghost Rider would make almost as much as SR how did that one turn out?

Anonymous said...

Ha me and my cohorts are taking over this site. Proving that in 2009........................

superman flies again!

Restart

And just to get the ball rolling. " your a fuckwitt REtard" and "Your logic is a joke you infantile monkey" AP your up.

Anonymous said...

^^

He is raping his MOM right now he'll be with you in a minute.

Anonymous said...

"Ha me and my cohorts are taking over this site. Proving that in 2009........................

superman flies again!

Restart"

If by taking over this site you mean coming back ad nauseum and making childish statements that can't be backed up and then getting your ass handed to you again and again.......

What a fuckin moron

ApologistPuncher said...

"Uhhhhh... AP... everyone on this site that hates the movie, even SSS, has said it only reached 200 million because of IMAX."

How's Younis' taint taste these days?

Sorry Apologist nut-mucnhers, the last 2 weeks of it's EXTENDED death-rattle was based PURELY on the DOLLAR THEATER. If you TRY to deny that, get a fuckin' EDUCATION.

And which film was more PROFITABLE, sissy? I thought so....

Fuck off, Apologist cunts!

ApologistPuncher said...

"He is raping his MOM right now he'll be with you in a minute."

Actually, it's YOUR mom. And your sister. Went from your mom's ass to your sisters mouth.

Be careful when you kiss them night-night tonight, sissy....

Anonymous said...

"Sorry Apologist nut-mucnhers, the last 2 weeks of it's EXTENDED death-rattle was based PURELY on the DOLLAR THEATER. If you TRY to deny that, get a fuckin' EDUCATION."

Educated people know how to spell.

Anonymous said...

"Educated people know how to spell."


Ooohhh, what a comeback.......really what you come to expect from an apologist.

Lame, fuckin lame.

But you do sum up Retard quite well. That guy is incoherent.

Father Finian

Anonymous said...

...and what now? A possible Supergirl TV series??

It's Super news everywhere at the moment, except for that Singer sequel.........

It'd be about now I'd give up hope of Singer returning to trash Superman again.......

dbss80 said...

"Ooohhh, what a comeback.......really what you come to expect from an apologist.

Lame, fuckin lame.

But you do sum up Retard quite well. That guy is incoherent.

Father Finian"

There is father coming to the aid of what's his name yet again but don't be fooled folks they are not the same person. Are you guys lovers instead??

swright said...

"Sorry Apologist nut-mucnhers, the last 2 weeks of it's EXTENDED death-rattle was based PURELY on the DOLLAR THEATER. If you TRY to deny that, get a fuckin' EDUCATION."

You really are a retarded half wit. You said that using the IMAX theare argument is an apologist argument, asshole. I'm telling you that it's not. That the very owner of this blog has stated many times that the IMAX is the main reason that the movie hit 200 million. Did it get a bump in the dollar theatres? Of course, just like every other movie. But without IMAX it doesn't get there even with that bump.

In case your dumb ass forgot here's your exact quote when the IMAX argument was brought up...

"Save your Apologist "spin" for BlueNuts. "

So I guess SSS, and every other hater on this board with a brain are now apologists sinc they believe that the movie doesn't hit 200 million without IMAX?

swright said...

Here's a quote from SSS...

"In its 11th weekend at the domestic box office, Singerman took in a whopping $453,273, and its total domestic take still sits at a disappointing $197,430,626. Frankly we're a little surpised that it's gotten this far based on how it was tracking earlier. Looking at the statistics, we can see its barely in many theaters (241) and hasn't been for a few weeks now. Where has the money come from the past 3 weeks you ask? The answer: IMAX. "

I know it's hard for someone with limited intelligence but did you notice the last sentence, asshole? That's right, IMAX is NOT an apologist argument.

Anonymous said...

"There is father coming to the aid of what's his name yet again but don't be fooled folks they are not the same person. Are you guys lovers instead??"

Oh my sides.

It's sad when apologists think there can't be more than one person who dislikes Singerman

Father

ApologistPuncher said...

"You really are a retarded half wit. You said that using the IMAX theare argument is an apologist argument, asshole. I'm telling you that it's not. That the very owner of this blog has stated many times that the IMAX is the main reason that the movie hit 200 million. Did it get a bump in the dollar theatres? Of course, just like every other movie. But without IMAX it doesn't get there even with that bump."

Big words coming from a limp-wristed sissy...

And try READING what was being discussed, you fucking shithead. I WAS TALKING ABOUT WB DRAGGING SINGERMAN OUT FOR 18 WEEKS. Your fucking shit for brains "cohort" brought up the IMAX, which was NOT my point. Don't think YOU are "educating" ANYONE, scatboy.

Once again, for the REtards and Younis-bedfellows out there: Singerman would NOT have made the paltry $200 million it did WITHOUT 18 weeks AND the dollar theaters.

ApologistPuncher said...

"I know it's hard for someone with limited intelligence but did you notice the last sentence, asshole? That's right, IMAX is NOT an apologist argument."

Keep showing how fucking STUPID you are, pussy.

Do fucking shit-stains like this NOT realize people are LAUGHING at them?? God, I wish I could see what THIS mongoloid looks like. Glasses and acne are a CERTAINTY.

Fuck YOU, Apologist afterbirth!!

Anonymous said...

"IMAX is NOT an apologist argument."

Wow, what a victory...IMAX

So if it wasn't for IMAX.....it would have been even more of a disappointment? That's a hell of a defence for it's supposed success.
And we're not talking about "standard" IMAX here either, but the novelty value of sequences in 3D!

So then by this argument if Spidey3 or Transformers had IMAX 3d screenings, how much would that've helped their success?

And how profitable was the IMAX 3D process in the scale of the film's overall "profit"?

ApologistPuncher said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
ApologistPuncher said...

Oh, and so EVERYONE can share in the laughter, THIS is what I said:

"The last few weeks were for a "dollar theater" bump, NOTHING more. They were hoping to squeeze every CENT out of that stink-bomb."

"swright" wants to turn this into an IMAX argument, when my point is WITHOUT QUESTION. Yet another Apologist "ploy": REDIRECTION. Why try to counter the ACTUAL POINT, when they can try to side-track it with inane bullshit??

"swright" found out what Younis' breath AND BS' asshole taste like at the EXACT. SAME. TIME. You sick fuck.....

Anonymous said...

Yeah, swright thinks he's clever with that sort of shit. Sad though at how obvious and desperate it is. When I pointed out the amount of hate directed at Singer on a forum, he actually went all cry baby on here and accused me of "changing the subject" on a Singersucks forum!! Man, now there's a stretch!

You give the guy some credit for thinking he's a cut above other brain dead apologists, and he let's you down again!

Nevermind, you get used to apologists jumping around like fleas on a hotplate

Father Finian

dbss80 said...

Are Father and AP done sucking eachother's dicks yet? Actually since they are the same person that meana AP is sucking his own dick. No wonder he is always talking about sex. That motherfucker is really deprived of it.

Here comes the standard mother joke comeback joke from AP folks.

Anonymous said...

"Here comes the standard mother joke comeback joke from AP folks."

Wrong again jackass. Once more for the fuckwits here, the biggest being Retard & dbss80, there are more than one person who dislikes the gayfest that is Singerman Returns

Apologists, they keep getting their ass handed to them and the best they can come up with is to accuse two different posters of being the same person. Just like the preschoolers they are.

Lame, fuckin lame

Father Finian

Anonymous said...

"Here comes the standard mother joke comeback joke from AP folks."

What you can rely on though are apologist predictions that are proven wrong time and time again.

Come back for another bitch slap soon!
Father Finian

Anonymous said...

"Here comes the standard mother joke comeback joke from AP folks."

..mother joke comeback joke...is that supposed to make sense?

Anonymous said...

"...and what now? A possible Supergirl TV series??"

Bring it on! More Supes for the straight audiences.
Sorry fags, but your Lord & Master, Gay Bryan looks like he'll have to make do with that famous fag, Tom Cruise in a Nazi uniform (can a movie be gayer than Returns? Leave it to Singer!).

Anonymous said...

"Bryan Singer (on Larry King Live) said he made Superman Returns "for girls,"

read: "for fags"

No shit Bryan!

Anonymous said...

From Agent DVD
Pondering the Best Movie Superhero


“The first Superman in many ways has become the benchmark against which all others are measured,” Al Gough says. “It was a grounded story, with larger-than-life images and visual effects that worked. You really believed a man could fly. It had great emotion and great heart.”

“And it was damn good, too,” Stan Lee says.........

.....This is filmmaking on an epic scale, creating a world populated by classic characters, simple motifs and pure Americana. Christopher Reeve so embodied the ideal Superman that Singer’s Superman Returns seems like a bad costume party by comparison."

Not just an empty costume party, but a BAD costume party.

Says it all

ApologistPuncher said...

"Are Father and AP done sucking eachother's dicks yet? Actually since they are the same person that meana AP is sucking his own dick. No wonder he is always talking about sex. That motherfucker is really deprived of it.

Here comes the standard mother joke comeback joke from AP folks."

Hey, let's pull out an Apologist benchmark, and use his OWN words against "him":

"Educated people know how to spell."

Fuck off, Apologist piss-stains!!

Anonymous said...

"Hey, let's pull out an Apologist benchmark, and use his OWN words against "him":"

Do you even know what an apologist is? You do get that i can accuse you of the same right.

Anonymous said...

(can a movie be gayer than Returns? Leave it to Singer!).
^^^
Yeah it can! After that he's doing a Brokeback Politician film called The Milkman!

ApologistPuncher said...

"Do you even know what an apologist is? You do get that i can accuse you of the same right."

Oh god, here we go again with a fucking APOLOGIST fucktard pulling out the "I know you are but what am I" bullshit. We went through this before, moron. Go FUCK yourself...

Anonymous said...

"Oh god, here we go again with a fucking APOLOGIST fucktard pulling out the "I know you are but what am I" bullshit. We went through this before, moron. Go FUCK yourself..."

So let me get this straight you are OK with being exactly what you accuse others of being. As long as you get that you are no different than what you are accusing others of. If you think you are get a dictionary.

ApologistPuncher said...

"So let me get this straight you are OK with being exactly what you accuse others of being. As long as you get that you are no different than what you are accusing others of. If you think you are get a dictionary."

You ever notice it's the fucking REtard's that need you to REPEAT things more than once?? Goes to show WHY "he's" an Apologist bitch...

Hey Apologist pubic-hair, go FUCK yourself.

Anonymous said...

"You ever notice it's the fucking REtard's that need you to REPEAT things more than once?? Goes to show WHY "he's" an Apologist bitch...

Hey Apologist pubic-hair, go FUCK yourself."

You ever notice that when you are backed into a corner all you have to do is insult people. Fact you are an apologist you just admitted it. Try to deny it now and i will find quotes of your's where you defended you reasons for hating SR and prove you wrong.

ApologistPuncher said...

"You ever notice that when you are backed into a corner all you have to do is insult people. Fact you are an apologist you just admitted it. Try to deny it now and i will find quotes of your's where you defended you reasons for hating SR and prove you wrong."

Backed into a corner? Jesus kid, how fucking DENSE are you?? Get the fuck out of here, you mongoloid piece of shit.

YOU are an Apologist, whether you want to play "semantics" or not. I'm done wasting my time on you, you little nut-sack. Go give verbal handjobs back over at BlueNuts. HERE, we have an AGE LIMIT.

For the LAST time, go FUCK yourself, you little ignorant sissy! ANOTHER Apologist knocked-the-fuck out....

ApologistPuncher said...

I see that little bitch "swright" took his "verbal beating" like a beaten dog. Ran away with his tail between his legs...

Yes folks, it really IS that EASY to knock-out an Apologist sissy!

Anonymous said...

"YOU are an Apologist, whether you want to play "semantics" or not. I'm done wasting my time on you, you little nut-sack. Go give verbal handjobs back over at BlueNuts. HERE, we have an AGE LIMIT."

This guy does not even realize he is insulting himself. YOU ARE AN APOLOGIST PERIOD!!! This should have been your screen name. Pro-SR-Apologistpuncher. That would actually make some sense. Your screename as it is makes no sense AT ALL. So keep on calling people apologist's as you are trashing yourself along with them,

Later retard.

Anonymous said...

how is AP an apologist? It makes no sense? An apologist is someone who defends something. A Singer apologist is someone who defends butt biy Singer. You clowns are defending SR, while those of us with a brian who have some semblnace of knowledge of the Superman character are attacking it.

ApologistPuncher said...

"how is AP an apologist? It makes no sense? An apologist is someone who defends something. A Singer apologist is someone who defends butt biy Singer. You clowns are defending SR, while those of us with a brian who have some semblnace of knowledge of the Superman character are attacking it."

Don't waste your time on this ass-nugget. He's trying to play the SAME "game" REtard did way back.

They want to say "I know you are, but what am I", thinking it will deflect the negative connotation their aptly-deserved "title" dictates. Unfortunately for these shit-for-brains, they are TOO STUPID to note the CAPITAL "A" on Apologist. This changes it from a "descriptive term" to a "TITLE". And NO amount of "semantics" will CHANGE the FACT it is a "TITLE".

I know I used a lot of "big words", so I'm aware NONE of these Apologists will "absorb" the big FAT knuckle-sandwich of knowledge they just received. But they'll feel it in the morning, and that's all that matters.

Once more, fuck-off, Apologist scum!

Anonymous said...

Dam I love to see AP/Father/Anon being owned. But of course we are digress from the Saturn Award winning Superman Returns. We should all be supporting..........

The Sequel in 2009!

Restart

Come on who's with me?

ApologistPuncher said...

Yeah, figures that little bitch would run. Fucking sissies.

Wake me up when someone INTERESTING has something to say....

Anonymous said...

"how is AP an apologist? It makes no sense? An apologist is someone who defends something."

BINGO give the man a prize. Which means anytime you defend your take on anything whether it be SR or say your religion that makes you an apologist. Anytime he gave reasons for hating the movie he was defending his positions which makes him an apologist. Those are the facts folks.

ApologistPuncher said...

"BINGO give the man a prize. Which means anytime you defend your take on anything whether it be SR or say your religion that makes you an apologist. Anytime he gave reasons for hating the movie he was defending his positions which makes him an apologist. Those are the facts folks."

Yep, I knew this fucking moron wouldn't be able to COMPREHEND. SO here it is AGAIN, for the fucking shitbag:

"Don't waste your time on this ass-nugget. He's trying to play the SAME "game" REtard did way back.

They want to say "I know you are, but what am I", thinking it will deflect the negative connotation their aptly-deserved "title" dictates. Unfortunately for these shit-for-brains, they are TOO STUPID to note the CAPITAL "A" on Apologist. This changes it from a "descriptive term" to a "TITLE". And NO amount of "semantics" will CHANGE the FACT it is a "TITLE".

I know I used a lot of "big words", so I'm aware NONE of these Apologists will "absorb" the big FAT knuckle-sandwich of knowledge they just received. But they'll feel it in the morning, and that's all that matters.

Once more, fuck-off, Apologist scum!"

Anonymous said...

I can't believe you guys are still in here fighting like cats and dogs. What does like a decade have to go bye before you guys shut up about this movie already?

ApologistPuncher said...

"I can't believe you guys are still in here fighting like cats and dogs. What does like a decade have to go bye before you guys shut up about this movie already?"

Anybody ask for your input, shitbird?

Go fuck yourself, you used anal-douche....

Anonymous said...

"Anybody ask for your input, shitbird?

Go fuck yourself, you used anal-douche...."

This is not a Q&A session fuckhead. It is a BLOG. If this was a message board they would have just banned you for that shit.

Anonymous said...

"But of course we are digress from the Saturn Award winning Superman Returns. We should all be supporting..........

The Sequel in 2009!

Restart

Come on who's with me?"

As usual, nobody.....

...even apologist's think you're full of shit

Anonymous said...

"Do you even know what an apologist is? You do get that i can accuse you of the same right."

Huh, what's with this shit? Given up defending Singer's gayfest?

This is the nerdy comic book fan who thinks he's being "clever" again

Yawn.......

Anonymous said...

"This is the nerdy comic book fan who thinks he's being "clever" again"

Your not a comic fan of Superman. That is why Singer fucked up he does not read them. You should check them out.

Anonymous said...

"Your not a comic fan of Superman. That is why Singer fucked up he does not read them. You should check them out."

Educated people know how to spell....
....try reading some books with big words in them junior.

Singer fucked up because he made a bad movie. Perhaps his gayboy scriptwriters should read them? They could read all the comics they want, but Singer would still kill it by his poor casting, laughable costuming, dreary direction and by shooting it in a bland digital format

Anonymous said...

"Educated people know how to spell....
....try reading some books with big words in them junior."

Uh i was not insulting you. You came off like you do not read the comics. I love the comics and the first 2 Superman movies mainly. the animated series was not bad.

ApologistPuncher said...

"This is not a Q&A session fuckhead. It is a BLOG. If this was a message board they would have just banned you for that shit."

What a fucking NERD! "Banned"?? Get the fuck out of here, you nut-licker.

Go back to BlueNuts where you're "protected" you SISSY!!

Anonymous said...

"What a fucking NERD! "Banned"?? Get the fuck out of here, you nut-licker.

Go back to BlueNuts where you're "protected" you SISSY!!"

Who the fuck is this asshole anyway? Get a fucking life and in a hurry.

dbss80 said...

"What a fucking NERD! "Banned"?? Get the fuck out of here, you nut-licker."

What a NERD. You are on a Superman BLOG talking about nut suckers and banging people's mom's and you are calling people nerds. Do you post from like a prison or something you friggin wackjob.

Anonymous said...

....calling someone a friggin prisoner wackjob just sounds so much nicer.

Now, that's a NERD.

ApologistPuncher said...

"What a NERD. You are on a Superman BLOG talking about nut suckers and banging people's mom's and you are calling people nerds. Do you post from like a prison or something you friggin wackjob."

Don't get your ass kicked enough on the playground, you little bitch? Got to come here and get some more?

When this little moron sprouts a few pubes (hence making him unattractive to BS) MAYBE he will grow a few brain cells too?? I mean, calling someone a "wackjob" is the BEST he can do?

Go fuck yourself, you used Apologist tampon!

ApologistPuncher said...

"Who the fuck is this asshole anyway? Get a fucking life and in a hurry."

I'm the guy who punches his fist into your mommy's gaping asshole. I upper-cut the shit out of THAT bitch.

You fucking REtards make it TOO easy sometimes. "Get a fucking life"?? Says the Apologist sissy posting on a Singerman Sucks site? PRICELESS!

dbss80 said...

"I'm the guy who punches his fist into your mommy's gaping asshole. I upper-cut the shit out of THAT bitch."

BLAH BLAH BLAH, someone get Father/AP his Tourette syndrome Meds in a hurry he is a having another hissy fit.

dbss80 said...

"You fucking REtards make it TOO easy sometimes. "Get a fucking life"?? Says the Apologist sissy posting on a Singerman Sucks site? PRICELESS!"

All you do is make sex jokes so you are not exactly winning awards for originality either asswipe.

dbss80 said...

Here you go Father/AP read this.

Tourette syndrome (also called Tourette's syndrome, Tourette's disorder, Gilles de la Tourette syndrome, GTS or, more commonly, simply Tourette's or TS) is an inherited neurological disorder with onset in childhood, characterized by the presence of multiple physical (motor) tics and at least one vocal (phonic) tic; these tics characteristically wax and wane. Tourette's is defined as part of a spectrum of tic disorders, which includes transient and chronic tics.

Tourette's was once considered a rare and bizarre syndrome, most often associated with the exclamation of obscene words or socially inappropriate and derogatory remarks (coprolalia). However, this symptom is present in only a small minority of people with Tourette's.[1] Tourette's is no longer considered a rare condition, but it may not always be correctly identified because most cases are classified as mild. Between 1 and 11 children per 1,000 have Tourette's; as many as one in a hundred people may have tic disorders,[2][3] with the more common tics of eye blinking, coughing, throat clearing, sniffing, and facial movements. People with Tourette's have normal life expectancy and intelligence. The severity of the tics decreases for most children as they pass through adolescence, and extreme Tourette's in adulthood is a rarity. Notable individuals with Tourette's are found in all walks of life.[4]

Genetic and environmental factors each play a role in the etiology of Tourette's, but the exact causes are unknown. In most cases, medication is unnecessary. There is no effective medication for every case of tics, but there are medications and therapies that can help when their use is warranted. Explanation and reassurance alone are often sufficient treatment;[5] education is an important part of any treatment plan.[6]

The eponym was bestowed by Jean-Martin Charcot (1825–93) on behalf of his resident, Georges Albert Édouard Brutus Gilles de la Tourette (1859–1904), a French physician and neurologist, who published an account of nine patients with Tourette's in 1885.

That will get you started so consult your mom, i mean your doctor right away.

ApologistPuncher said...

The funny, and SAD, part of that is, the fucking douche COULDN'T read ANY of it. He's so fuckin' stupid, he had to ask mommy to do it for "him"...

TWO can play this game;

MENTAL RETARDATION: Mental retardation is a developmental disability that is marked by lower-than-normal intelligence and limited daily living skills. Mental retardation is normally present at birth or develops early in life.

DESCRIPTION: Mental retardation is defined by two standards. The first standard is a person's level of intelligence. Intelligence levels are usually measured by special tests called intelligence tests. Intelligence tests provide a numerical ranking of a person's mental abilities. That ranking is called an intelligence quotient or, more commonly, an IQ. In general, a person with an IQ score of less than 75 is said to be retarded.

The second standard for mental retardation is adaptive skills. The term "adaptive skills" means how well a person can deal with the tasks of everyday life. These tasks include the ability to speak and understand; home-living skills; use of community resources; leisure, self-care, and social skills; self-direction; basic academic skills (reading, writing, and arithmetic); and work skills. A person is regarded as mentally retarded if he or she is unable to dress, feed, wash, or otherwise care for him- or herself; to hold a job; or to carry out most of the other tasks needed to get through an ordinary day.

Mental-health professionals classify dbss80 into one level of retardation:

Profound Mental Retardation

-IQ scores of less than 20
-Includes about 1 percent to 2 percent of the mentally retarded population
-Individuals at this level can often develop basic communication and self-care skills. They often have other mental disorders, i.e addiction to "salad-tossing"

When mommy tries to read it to him, she's going to sum it up in 6 tiny words....

"You're not retarded, you're just SPECIAL".

Go fuck yourself, shit for brains!

ApologistPuncher said...

"BLAH BLAH BLAH, someone get Father/AP his Tourette syndrome Meds in a hurry he is a having another hissy fit."

I almost forgot, nice "comeback" here, junior. "Durrhh, I gots nothin' I can's say so's I's gonna say sumthin' like a dum-dum. Durrrhhhh".

dbss80 said...

"Go fuck yourself, shit for brains!"

Oh no it's another attack here is more for you.



What are the symptoms?

Tics are classified as either simple or complex. Simple motor tics are sudden, brief, repetitive movements that involve a limited number of muscle groups. Some of the more common simple tics include eye blinking and other vision irregularities, facial grimacing, shoulder shrugging, and head or shoulder jerking. Simple vocalizations might include repetitive throat-clearing, sniffing, or grunting sounds. Complex tics are distinct, coordinated patterns of movements involving several muscle groups. Complex motor tics might include facial grimacing combined with a head twist and a shoulder shrug. Other complex motor tics may actually appear purposeful, including sniffing or touching objects, hopping, jumping, bending, or twisting. Simple vocal tics may include throat-clearing, sniffing/snorting, grunting, or barking. More complex vocal tics include words or phrases. Perhaps the most dramatic and disabling tics include motor movements that result in self-harm such as punching oneself in the face or vocal tics including coprolalia (uttering swear words) or echolalia (repeating the words or phrases of others). Some tics are preceded by an urge or sensation in the affected muscle group, commonly called a premonitory urge. Some with TS will describe a need to complete a tic in a certain way or a certain number of times in order to relieve the urge or decrease the sensation.

Tics are often worse with excitement or anxiety and better during calm, focused activities. Certain physical experiences can trigger or worsen tics, for example tight collars may trigger neck tics, or hearing another person sniff or throat-clear may trigger similar sounds. Tics do not go away during sleep but are often significantly diminished.

Nothing here about a desire to rape people's mothers but i am sure you are a rare case.

dbss80 said...

"(repeating the words or phrases of others)."

This right here is a big one since you and Father are the same guy. I guess you have a split personality as well. Get help for that too.

ApologistPuncher said...

I've got one that's PERFECT for you, since the best you've got is "tics". So utterly, utterly LAME....

Verb 1. come out of the closet; to state openly and publicly one's homosexuality; "That REtard outed last year"; make known to the public information that was previously known only to a few people or that was meant to be kept a secret.

It's time, junior. Your mom ALREADY hates you, and to everyone else, it's OBVIOUS. Self-hate = Self-destruction....

Yet ANOTHER K.O. for the INTELLIGENT!

dbss80 said...

"Lame, fuckin lame

Father Finian"

AP

" So utterly, utterly LAME...."

Hey father/AP what's up??

Anonymous said...

"...you are not exactly winning awards for originality either asswipe." dbss80

...talk about the pot and the fuckin kettle.

Fuck off, you are a bore.

For something different, how about you defend the Singer piece of shit?

Oh you can't...

ApologistPuncher said...

Hey, I can do that too!

"is "

dbss80

"is"

REtard

They MUST be the same person! What a cock-smoker.

Wait, they do BOTH love the salad-tossing. Hmmmmm......

dbss80 said...

"They MUST be the same person! What a cock-smoker.

Wait, they do BOTH love the salad-tossing. Hmmmmm......"

Now that was not too bad. I guess you took my advice and are on medication now. Keep it up the worst is behind you.

ApologistPuncher said...

"Now that was not too bad. I guess you took my advice and are on medication now. Keep it up the worst is behind you."

Here's something you Apologists ALL seem to lack:

wit 1 (wt)
n.
1. The natural ability to perceive and understand; intelligence.
2.
a. Keenness and quickness of perception or discernment; ingenuity. Often used in the plural: living by one's wits.

b. WITS Sound mental faculties; sanity: scared out of my wits.
3.
a. The ability to perceive and express in an ingeniously humorous manner the relationship between seemingly incongruous or disparate things.

b. One noted for this ability, especially one skilled in repartee.
c. A person of exceptional intelligence.

Almost like reading the complete OPPOSITE of all of their bullshit, isn't it?