Monday, August 28, 2006

Box Office Update: Too Little, Too Late

A few weeks late, a few million short.

In it's 9th weekend at the domestic box office, Singerman surprisingly showed a little life, or at least it did as compared to it's previous efforts. In weekend 9, Singerman grossed $780,405, or only about 8% less than it took in last weekend, good for 20th place. Not bad considering it only lost 72 theaters from the prior weekend, but not good either, considering this movie should've still been grossing in the million dollar plus weekends at this point in time, not barely edging out movies like Cars that has been in theaters for 3 weeks longer. Even with this current weekend's gross, the cumulative gross sits at just $195,388,237.

And what would a box office article be without a comparison to Batman Begins? In it's 9th weekend at the domestic box office, Begins took in $1,050,497 or about 25.8% higher. At this point in time, Begins cumulative domestic take was $201,149,986, or about 2.9% more than Singerman. Look for Singerman to finally peter out somewhere around $197 million.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

HAHAHAHA SSS, you are nothing but a fanboy clown you know that. I see you changed that total at the bottom from 196, or 197 to just 197. Go ahead try to deny that you changed it, lets see how big a liar your ass is.

S.S.S. said...

I havent changed anything, you moron. Your really running out of things to say arent you?

Anonymous said...

I havent changed anything, you moron. Your really running out of things to say arent you?

You lie so much it is getting harder to keep track of them all. We both know you changed the number SSS.

Anonymous said...

Well he did change the wording slightly. I do remember he said something about it finishing up somewhere in between 196 and 197 and now it says around 197 but the number 196 was definately there before. You boys should really learn to play nice, it is only a million bucks you are arguing about.

S.S.S. said...

Let me ask you this, what purpose would it serve for me to change it from saying "196 to 197" to just "197?" I dont follow the logic here? It's basically the same figure. How does that benefit me in anyway???
I'm flattered that you study my blog so thoroughly that you think you've committed it to memory, but you're clearly mistaken. Try again.

Anonymous said...

You had it at 196 or 197 and then changed it to just 197, i am not the first poster who was over the top rude to you, but i did notice the same change in your blog.